On 20.08.2013 10:42, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 20.08.2013 10:20, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> >On 08/20/2013 10:12 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> >>>So my question to Klaus: Is there something like this planned or would
> >>>a patch be accepted which adds a feature like this? As far as I know a
> >>>
On 13.03.2013 11:44, Michael Frank wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure whether this is a bug or an intended feature:
>
> When using an SVDRP command the result displayed always lacks the
> hyphen in the last line, e.g. lstc returns
>
> 250-2609 Canvas (MPEG4);TV
> Vlaanderen:12722:HC56M2S0:S19.2E:
On 10.03.2013 20:40, Peter Münster wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10 2013, fnu wrote:
>
> > But to change it in a global way like this is IMHO not a way to go.
>
> Did you understand my suggestion? Here again: not writable: warning, not
> readable: exit. Is that a problem for real-life systems?
For most p
On 27.12.2012 16:55, VDR User wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer:
> Pointing out that the last stable release of VDR having an old
> timestamp has nothing to do with people _choosing_ to use the
> developer version, which is warned and well-known to possibly contain
> changes
On 27.12.2012 13:21, VDR User wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:20 AM, fnu wrote:
> >> ... there are way too much changes at the moment :)
> >
> > FullAck, but the number of changes are not the issue, it's more the
> > sustainability and the time frame within the changes. Looking to the last 5
>
On 04.01.2009 22:34, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 04.01.2009 19:21, Nicolas Huillard wrote:
> > Klaus Schmidinger a écrit :
> >> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> >> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> >> use a different file nam
On 04.01.2009 11:55, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Up to now VDR has used names like 001.vdr for its recording files.
> While moving to Transport Stream as the recording format, I need to
> use a different file name extension, and so was wondering which one
> to use. My first idea was *.ts, for "Trans
On 16.03.2008 22:55, Florian Gleixner wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> >
> > For me personally playbackability with VDR was never a priority.
> >
> > I've been using VDR for recording since Oktober 2000, back then i had to
> > write my own cut
On 16.03.2008 22:20, Florian Gleixner wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > On 16.03.2008 17:55, Florian Gleixner wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> i use dvbcut to cut my recordings. After cutting i can rename the
> >> resulting mpg file to 001.vdr, de
On 16.03.2008 17:55, Florian Gleixner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i use dvbcut to cut my recordings. After cutting i can rename the
> resulting mpg file to 001.vdr, delete the index file and run genindex
> and then i have a perfect cutted recording. This works well for all
> recordings that are smaller than
On 03.02.2008 12:17, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 02/03/08 12:06, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > On 03.02.2008 11:17, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> >> So, here's the straw poll:
> >>
> >>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's
On 03.02.2008 11:17, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
> So, here's the straw poll:
>
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
Is the CAM Handling regarding multiple parallel recodings (on the same
channel) fixed
On 15.01.2008 09:35, Magnus Hörlin wrote:
> I'm sorry for bothering you with a question that should possibly have been
> sent to the mplayer mailing list.
> Next week I'm going to Tenerife to relax by the pool, but I don't want to
> miss any biathlon, alpine- or cross-country skiing transmissions,
On 18.11.2007 17:01, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
> Maybe it actually is about time for me to build a new VDR.
> I'll probably take a look at the Reel Extension HD PCI.
> But that means I'll also need a new motherboard with at least
> five PCI slots (for 3 DVB-S cards, 1 DVB-T and the Extension HD).
Bernd Juraschek wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I want to do some kind of offline modifying vdr timers, but I don't know
> how to identify timers.
>
> If I use the timer id to change or delete VDR timers, then this will go
> wrong if VDR has deleted some timers since the remote site has retrieved
> the
On 01.07.2007 21:10, Georg Acher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:43:04PM +0200, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
> > If only the hardware vendors where as "united" as the movie-industry.
>
> HDCP was invented by Intel, Silicon Image holds a lot of patents on DVI
On 01.07.2007 19:40, Georg Acher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
>
> > or better or whatever. cool, no problem. what? you signed a NDA that
> > does not allow you distribute the os in the first place? your bad.
>
> Once again, and now in capitals.
>
Simon Baxter wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a couple of boxes running VDR on a network. I've ended up in this
> situation because of a lack of PCI slots for capture cards, and a
> PVR-500/Via chipset incompatability.
>
> I can use the remote menu plugin to set timers in the 2nd box from the 1st
> one, w
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Added note: It is an encrypted channel and the CAM-found-message always
> appears a few seconds after VDR started, but before VDR tunes the
> channel and starts the timer. A few seconds later a:
Ups.
This must read: AFTER VDR tun
Hi
I have recently updated from VDR 1.2.6 to 1.4.6
I have the problem that once VDR emergency exists, for whatever reason,
it never gets the recording started again in time, so it emergency
exists again and again until the recording has ended.
If i manually disable the timer, wait a few seconds
Carsten Koch wrote:
> I have a distributed VDR system in my house with a lot of disks
> that are NFS mounted by VDR PCs in two rooms.
> In order to conserve energy, I have used hdparm to set a spin down
> delay after which the disks turn themselves off.
> When /video/.update is touched (one of the
Stefan Huelswitt wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm playing around with 1.5.0
> Initialy I wasn't able to tune to any channel. Even for FTA vdr
> kept saying "not available".
> It took me nearly an hour to find the reason for that:
> I had set PrimaryLimit=20
> I have this setting since ages, but cannot say why an
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Heikki Manninen wrote:
>
>>On su, 2007-01-14 at 14:48 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Your CAM doesn't respond to the QUERY that VDR sends to it.
>>>So VDR can't ask the CAM whether it is able to decrypt a certain
>>>channel (in addition to others it is already
Pasi Juppo wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>>Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
>>
>>>Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'd say the only downside of the Linux support kills it as a VDR
>>>
Darren Wilkinson wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>> Video is inherently bandwith intensive.
>> At least (for PAL):
>> 720x576x4x25 = about 40MB/s (*)
>> 1920x1080x4x25 = about 200MB/s
>>
>> And that's taking aside ANY of the other process
Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I'd say the only downside of the Linux support kills it as a VDR
>>platform. Graphic is NOT accelerated.
>>
>>That's the only downside i'm aware
Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
> i can see many of us are seeking for the right hardware for vdr, so i
> am. i want to start some discussion about the upcoming Sony PS3 as an
> vdr client on steroids. as it will support linux out of the box, it
> seams logical to, at least, think about it. i came to
Christian Wieninger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>>Does epgsearch save any status from epg-data and/or timers?
>
> yes, but the 'done' approach is currently different: epgsearch marks and
> saves a broadcast as done only if it has been
Christian Wieninger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for a new feature of epgsearch, I'd like to do a continuous check (in a
> separate thread) if any timer was deleted via OSD or SVDRP since the
> last check.
>
> The only thing I found so far is to build a timer array and compare it
> at each check with the cur
Rainer Zocholl wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Norbert Goebel) 13.09.06 18:21
>
>
>
>>Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>
>>>Not excatly.
>>>
>>>I would call it "semy-online"-storage.
>>>
>>>Normaly the HDDs are switch
Norbert Goebel wrote:
> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>
>>
>> Not excatly.
>>
>> I would call it "semy-online"-storage.
>>
>> Normaly the HDDs are switched off.
>> But as they are connected to USB-Power-Switches they can be switched
&g
Carsten Koch wrote:
> Neither is my VDR system even close to the largest one.
> I believe that Matthias Schniedermeier has so many disks
> in his house that the house no longer requires a separate
> heating system. ;-)
Not excatly.
I would call it "semy-online"-storage.
Normaly the HDDs are swi
Carsten Koch wrote:
> martin wrote:
> ...
>
>>go and get yourself a new hard disc :-)
>
>
> Well, that option is of course always available. ;-)
> Let's take a look at my vdr system:
>
> /video> df -hT
> FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda2 xfs147G 12G
33 matches
Mail list logo