-Original Message-
From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf
Of Tony Houghton
Sent: 6. tammikuuta 2009 2:08
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:17:52 +0200
"Jukka Vaisanen" wrote:
>
Yes, it's a good idea to get 1:1 pixel mapping on your display. Double
scaling (first pc, then display) is not a good idea, ever.
But, some problems arise:
HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a
vertical blanking time slot believe it or not) so it may seem like just
ano
MythTV includes its own software player and VDPAU support was added
directly into it.
Here are the changes, http://cvs.mythtv.org/trac/changeset/19165
I'm sure it'll make its way into xine as well. Of course we can gripe
about it day and night until it does, right ;) And yes, there's really
no re
: Re: [vdr] 576i output on DVI->HDMI?
2008/7/15 Jukka Vaisanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My understanding is that 576i in HDMI is actually done as a 100Hz
> displaymode where each frame is sent twice. This is because the HDMI
> spec doesn't allow "speeds" as low as
With all the recent talk about deinterlacing, I was wondering if it's
now possible to get 576i output over DVI->HDMI from xine-based output
devices for VDR? I was a dxr3 user for a long time and the deinterlacing
offered by A/V hardware never gave me any issues.. Now I have an A/V
receiver with a
I usually lurk here so my vote represents the 'user' community more than
the 'dev'..
Yes to stable 1.6.0 with current kernel-drivers - VDR needs new users
that can get it running easily out of the box with a debian bare bones
install. The people who want HDTV support are going to go with the
dev-r
