Well, known fact, vdr-portal.de has been in maintenance mode before certificate
did expire.
I assume its again "unfriendly fire", too many crazy people out there, but
haven't got any feedback till date ... unfortunately.
Cheers
fnu
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: vdr Im Auftrag von Nar
> VDR was designed to run on older equipment with limited resources
This is nonsense, like Windows (MCE) VDR can run same hardware with limited
resources, but with all the same pro's and con's. Actual distros with their
actual kernels do have the same requirements to hardware. And looking to the
Hi there Karim,
> Is there any version or any patch I missed ?
noad did never work with HD recordings, there has only been a patch a couple of
time ago, which made it possible to recognize HD recordings for noad, to stop
scanning immediately in case of and not to waste CPU time.
If you want to
Hi Tor,
well honestly, I don't think it's one of the patches, it seems for me rather to
be again somehow "vdr-plugin-extrecmenu".
The VDR version as of today has been tested since 2 month, to become part for
stable-vdr (first lucid, then natty) and nobody did realize this problem. But I
need t
> Your claim that my comment is "cheap" is completely uncalled for.
Well, just needless, even you should realize that comments like this don't help
anybody.
That's what I read: "Hey stupid I'm super cool and able to compile VDR by
myself, you're a nobody just able to use this bullshit yaVDR ...
> last I heard yavdr uses a bunch of patches but since I don't use it I don't
> know that 100%.
Well that's always good and cheap to talk about things about any individual
heard about ... :-(
@Torgeir
Which version of yavdr do you use? Might it be possible to open a case on
vdr-portal.de in y
