Hi,
Am 25.03.2013 20:09, schrieb Lucian Muresan:
> That is also due to some acrobatic
> conditional constructs in some desperate tries to keep the same
> makefiles also backwards compatible with a whole lot of older VDR
> series, instead of just providing the old makefile under another name
> just
On 25.03.2013 17:36, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> The best way to resolve this would be to switch to separate patches as
> soon as possible. The extension patch is broken by design, as it causes
> the VDR to place header files with conditional compiling expressions. So
> the API changes based on the DEFI
> https://www.facebook.com/VideoDiskRecorder
> Klaus
Welcome to the spyware!...
*Kopfshüttel*
--
Regards
Gentoo Developer
Joerg Bornkessel
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 25.03.2013 17:32, VDR User wrote:
Not the Star Trek skin
It's just the default ;-)
You can use whatever skin you like.
Klaus
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Lucian Muresan wrote:
I wonder, do you use vanilla VDR or a patched VDR on Archlinux?
https://github.com/CReimer/vdr4arch/blob/master/vdr/PKGBUILD#L31
One patch (MainMenuHooks) which doesn't change anything on the plugin API.
Gentoo
uses the extended patch, it's just the way it is, users are
Not the Star Trek skin
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:09 AM, eikesa...@t-online.de
wrote:
> Klaus said that he thinks about internal livebuffer functionality in VDR
> after 2.0.
There have been discussions here about the best way to add it to VDR.
As long as it can be turned off and/or sent to ram instead of
harddisk, I thi
https://www.facebook.com/VideoDiskRecorder
Klaus
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Hello!
> Now that VDR 2.0 is just around the corner i would like to check if
> there is any progress to the great livebuffer that was back in the 1.6
> days? I tested a 1.7.x version some long time ago, but that did not
> work as well as the "original" version..
I never tested Ye Good Olde li
> I tested a 1.7.x version some long time ago, but that did not
> work as well as the "original" version..
There has never ever been any official Livebuffer feature in any VDR
version.
I hope it'll take a long time to make it into VDR, e.g. as long as it took
to get any file-/recordings-manageme
10 matches
Mail list logo