Re: [vdr] [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread VDR User
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:54 AM, fnu wrote: > Not only my friends, e.g. one guy of an international customer, a US citizen > living in Germany since 10-15 years, is not willing to talk in german with > us. Just another example, but even our famous foreign workers from all over > Europe do better h

Re: [vdr] [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread VDR User
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> It would be nice to hear what Klaus prefers as the main development >> channel >> (notice: *main* development channel, not the only channel). > > Well, I always considered the VDR mailing list to be the main development > channel. But w

Re: [vdr] [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread fnu
> von Klaus Schmidinger > But with the recent "shitstorm" I'm having second thoughts... Hmm, I had also read shitstorms, this does have a different quality. I would also take it positiv, nobody is questioning your execellent work, in contrary, a lot of do take part of it and are interessted in. So

Re: [vdr] [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread fnu
> by VDR User > but I guess your friends disagree. Not only my friends, e.g. one guy of an international customer, a US citizen living in Germany since 10-15 years, is not willing to talk in german with us. Just another example, but even our famous foreign workers from all over Europe do better h

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Am 30.12.2012 12:52, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: - Using relative paths again when building plugins locally (by request of Udo Richter). In compatibility mode, relative paths seem to be not a good idea. The reason is that for example LIBDIR gets passed as an argument to make (e. g. ../..

[vdr] Betr: Re: [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread cedric . dewijs
>Well, I always considered the VDR mailing list to be the main development >channel. But with the recent "shitstorm" I'm having second thoughts... > >Klaus Please don't leave. I don't speak english good enough to write a better reply here. :-) Regards, Cedric ___

Re: [vdr] [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread Vidar Tyldum
Den 31.12.2012 09:35, skrev Klaus Schmidinger: > Well, I always considered the VDR mailing list to be the main development > channel. But with the recent "shitstorm" I'm having second thoughts... Take it as a compliment. It just goes to show how many have come to rely on VDR and that there is an

Re: [vdr] [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 31.12.2012 09:29, Vidar Tyldum wrote: ... It would be nice to hear what Klaus prefers as the main development channel (notice: *main* development channel, not the only channel). Well, I always considered the VDR mailing list to be the main development channel. But with the recent "shitstorm"

Re: [vdr] [DISCUSSION REQUEST] reintroduce a common make configuration file in VDR-1.7.35

2012-12-31 Thread Vidar Tyldum
31.12.2012 00:54, fnu: >> As good as vdrportal is as a VDR resource, the language barrier _is_ a > problem for english speakers. > > Same with this mailing list for german speakers ... and now? English isn't just for the British and Americans. I realize that if I start a VDR forum/mailing-list an