Re: [vdr] *scanf %a, patches...

2012-12-02 Thread Juergen Lock
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 08:58:31PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:19:44PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > On 01.12.2012 21:14, Juergen Lock wrote: > > > In article <50ba09cc.2040...@flensrocker.de> you write: > > >> Am 30.11.2012 11:32, schrieb Gerald Dachs: > > >>> Am

Re: [vdr] *scanf %a, patches...

2012-12-02 Thread Juergen Lock
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:19:44PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 01.12.2012 21:14, Juergen Lock wrote: > > In article <50ba09cc.2040...@flensrocker.de> you write: > >> Am 30.11.2012 11:32, schrieb Gerald Dachs: > >>> Am 2012-11-30 10:17, schrieb Lars Hanisch: > Looks like the pointer

Re: [vdr] *scanf %a, patches...

2012-12-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 01.12.2012 21:14, Juergen Lock wrote: In article <50ba09cc.2040...@flensrocker.de> you write: Am 30.11.2012 11:32, schrieb Gerald Dachs: Am 2012-11-30 10:17, schrieb Lars Hanisch: Looks like the pointer returned by sscanf is not valid: 32: bool tComponent::FromString(const char *s) 33: {