Re: [vdr] vdr-1.7.32 plugin dvbhddevice fails

Am 19.11.2012 05:27, schrieb Richard Scobie: I have just upgraded from vdr-1.7.31 to vdr-1.7.32 with S2-6400 and on making plugins, I receive the following error: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/rs/vdr-1.7.32/PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/libhdffcmd' gcc -O3 -Wall -fPIC -shared -o libhdffcmd-0.1.

[vdr] vdr-1.7.32 plugin dvbhddevice fails

I have just upgraded from vdr-1.7.31 to vdr-1.7.32 with S2-6400 and on making plugins, I receive the following error: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/rs/vdr-1.7.32/PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/libhdffcmd' gcc -O3 -Wall -fPIC -shared -o libhdffcmd-0.1.0.so bitbuffer.o hdffcmd_av.o hdffcmd_base.o

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] correct some includes at plugins

Am 19.11.2012 00:20, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: > On 19.11.2012 00:03, Lars Hanisch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 20.10.2012 15:03, schrieb Lars Hanisch: >>> Plugins should use >>> >>> #include >>> >>> and not >>> >>> #include "vdr/..." >> >> Any reason, this didn't get into 1.7.32? >> Is it wrong

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] correct some includes at plugins

On 19.11.2012 00:03, Lars Hanisch wrote: Hi, Am 20.10.2012 15:03, schrieb Lars Hanisch: Plugins should use #include and not #include "vdr/..." Any reason, this didn't get into 1.7.32? Is it wrong or was it just missed? ;) It's not wrong and it wasn't missed, either ;-) It's just s

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] correct some includes at plugins

Hi, Am 20.10.2012 15:03, schrieb Lars Hanisch: > Plugins should use > > #include > > and not > > #include "vdr/..." Any reason, this didn't get into 1.7.32? Is it wrong or was it just missed? ;) It would help packaging plugins which needs headers of the dvb?ddevice-plugins. Here's a lin

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.32

VDR developer version 1.7.32 is now available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.32.tar.bz2 A 'diff' against the previous version is available at ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.31-1.7.32.diff MD5 checksums: 068ba78fd427694dcc480fe3b2d07148 vdr-1.7.32.tar.bz2 222f