On 08/12/12 16:15, Jouni Karvo wrote:
On 12.08.2012 15:46, JJussi wrote:
On 12.8.2012 15.32, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 12.08.2012 14:28, Jouni Karvo wrote:
On 12.08.2012 12:23, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
But is it really that necessary?
It is not necessary, but having a remote with differe
On 08/12/12 14:32, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 12.08.2012 14:28, Jouni Karvo wrote:
On 12.08.2012 12:23, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
But is it really that necessary?
It is not necessary, but having a remote with different order of
coulours, it is weird to have them in a different order on the O
On 08/08/2012 06:08 PM, VDR User wrote
> Honestly, I don't care about the Olympics at all. I hate that every
> channel gives it so much coverage instead of reporting real &
> important news. Will be glad when it's over.
Well, I am also glad that they are over but for different reason.
(even all go
Hi,
Upgraded a bunch of stuff (vdr -> 1.7.28, xinelib -> latest from hg) and
I've lost my transparent OSD (ST:TNG) when using vdr-sxfe. What is it
that controls the transparency of the OSD? Does vdr overlay the OSD
onto the video, or is it sent as a separate layer somehow to the output
> First, it's not true remote have followed some "master plan" for 10 years
> that's RGYB.
VDRs master plan, not all remotes. We are talking about VDR here ... :-(
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vd
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:52 AM, fnu wrote:
>> But is it really that necessary?
> I guess it depends on the point of view.
>
> It is right not all remotes provide the same key order, but the master plan
> since over 10 years is "RGYB". So if a individual doesn't want to use a
> remote following
On 12.08.2012 15:46, JJussi wrote:
On 12.8.2012 15.32, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 12.08.2012 14:28, Jouni Karvo wrote:
On 12.08.2012 12:23, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
But is it really that necessary?
It is not necessary, but having a remote with different order of
coulours, it is weird to h
On 12.8.2012 16.09, fnu wrote:
>I have too.. Already for years (from 2005).. I have RGBY. It's "Silver
Stone" -case with integrated IR remote.
Well then you're already used to the "wrong" mapping. I guess you'll
struggle if you get the correct order, isn't it ... ?
SCNR ... ;-)
Regards
f
> I have too.. Already for years (from 2005).. I have RGBY. It's "Silver Stone"
> -case with integrated IR remote.
Well then you're already used to the "wrong" mapping. I guess you'll struggle
if you get the correct order, isn't it … ?
SCNR … ;-)
Regards
fnu
___
On 12.8.2012 15.32, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 12.08.2012 14:28, Jouni Karvo wrote:
On 12.08.2012 12:23, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
But is it really that necessary?
It is not necessary, but having a remote with different order of
coulours, it is weird to have them in a different order on the
On 12.08.2012 14:28, Jouni Karvo wrote:
On 12.08.2012 12:23, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
But is it really that necessary?
It is not necessary, but having a remote with different order of coulours, it
is weird to have them in a different order on the OSD and in the remote. Plus
the skip 1min f
On 12.08.2012 12:23, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
But is it really that necessary?
It is not necessary, but having a remote with different order of
coulours, it is weird to have them in a different order on the OSD and
in the remote. Plus the skip 1min forwards and 1min backwards during a
repl
> But is it really that necessary?
I guess it depends on the point of view.
It is right not all remotes provide the same key order, but the master plan
since over 10 years is "RGYB". So if a individual doesn't want to use a remote
following VDR's standard, should find a way around by themself, a
On 12.08.2012 00:04, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
On 08/11/12 23:48, VDR User wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:21 AM, wrote:
VDR currently assumes all remote controls have the same order of buttons.
This is not always the case. This patch allows you to change the order
of buttons in the UI.
This fe
14 matches
Mail list logo
