Re: [vdr] xine-lib and vaapi support

2010-11-10 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Tony Houghton may or may not have written... > On 08/11/10 12:50, Theunis Potgieter wrote: [snip] > You can tell mplayer the exact ratio of your monitor and the exact ratio of > the video on the command line and it correctly calculates how to display > it. vdr-sxfe and vdr-fbfe have

Re: [vdr] xine-lib and vaapi support

2010-11-10 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that lucian orasanu may or may not have written... > how about moving to mplayer instead of xine-lib, is not maintained very > well any more? Feel free to help out, by all means... -- | Darren Salt| linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Toon | using Debian GNU/Linux |

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Christian Wieninger
Hi, well, the intended behaviour was: setting 'if present': two events match if both have non empty episode names that match. If not, the events are handled as different, resulting in more eventually double recordings. setting 'Yes': the match is achieved if the episode names match, also if bo

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-10 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:09:46 +0100 Andreas Brachold wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, den 10.11.2010, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Frank Schmirler: > > ACK. Unique IDs over the lifetime of an SVDRP connection solve the > > actual problem. Everything beyond get's too complicated. > > Here I would agree with

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-10 Thread Andreas Brachold
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 10.11.2010, 12:23 +0100 schrieb Frank Schmirler: > ACK. Unique IDs over the lifetime of an SVDRP connection solve the > actual problem. Everything beyond get's too complicated. Here I would agree with you. > Guess a touch /video/.update would result in new IDs for all > rec

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Teemu Suikki
2010/11/10 Dominic Evans : > I did a bit more digging and discovered this was a new option since > 0.9.25.beta7 and is listed in the HISTORY as: > >> Avoid repeats: 'Compare subtitle' has now a third value 'if present' >> besides 'no' and 'yes'. With this setting epgsearch will classify two >> even

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Dominic Evans
On 10/11/10 13:25, Dominic Evans wrote: I don't think its a bug, it seems to be the intended function. 1) First it checks that we either said 'don't compare the title' or the titles match (!compareTitle || Title1 == Title2) 2a) Then it ANDs this with a check that either we said 'don't compare t

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Dominic Evans
On 10/11/10 10:09, Teemu Suikki wrote: 2010/11/10 Dominic Evans: On 10/11/10 09:09, Teemu Suikki wrote: Why doesn't it match? The descriptions are 100% identical. Check your search timer's configuration for comparing 'sub-title' when avoiding repeats. Compare subtitle should be set to eithe

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Teemu Suikki
2010/11/10 Dominic Evans : > On 10/11/10 09:09, Teemu Suikki wrote: >> >> Why doesn't it match? The descriptions are 100% identical. >> > > Check your search timer's configuration for comparing 'sub-title' when > avoiding repeats. Compare subtitle should be set to either 'No' or 'If > present', oth

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Teemu Suikki
>>> Check your search timer's configuration for comparing 'sub-title' when >>> avoiding repeats. Compare subtitle should be set to either 'No' or 'If >>> present', otherwise the comparison will also return false if your EPG >>> doesn't contain a subtitle for the entry. >> >> Hey, that was it! Thank

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Dominic Evans
On 10/11/10 12:05, Teemu Suikki wrote: I think there is a bug in epgsearch.. See epgsearchtools.c line 806: if ((!compareTitle || Title1 == Title2)&& (!compareSubtitle || (Subtitle1 == Subtitle2&& (compareSubtitle==2 || Subtitle1!="" I don't really understand the last check. Per

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-10 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:44:59 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote > The question at hand is whether the *number* used in the LSTR and > LSTT command listings to identify a particular recording or timer, > respectively, shall always start at 1 and count up, and be > renumbered whenever an item is newly

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-10 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:33:05 +0100, Udo Richter wrote > In other words, store the unique ID in the info file permanently, right? > What happens if two VDR instances write to the same video directory? > What if you download a recording from a friend? In that case you > might have two recordings wit

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-10 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 11/10/10 10:38, Frank Schmirler wrote: > On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:33:05 +0100, Udo Richter wrote >> In other words, store the unique ID in the info file permanently, right? >> What happens if two VDR instances write to the same video directory? >> What if you download a recording from a friend? In

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-10 Thread Steffen Barszus
2010/11/10 Ludwig Nussel : > Udo Richter wrote: >> Am 09.11.2010 16:35, schrieb Matthias Wächter: >> > You just re-introduce the old problem. Don't ever re-number. If you >> > don't renumber any SVDRP client can be safe in assuming for (nearly) any >> > time span to mean the same recording as the s

[vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Teemu Suikki
Hi, I recently updated my VDR from 1.4.5 to 1.7.15, and also updated all plugins to their latest version. EPGSearch is epgsearch-0.9.25.beta17. Everything works, but epgsearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore! Here's an example from the file epgsearchdone.data: R 1266873900 1800 0

Re: [vdr] EPGSearch doesn't avoid repeats anymore?

2010-11-10 Thread Dominic Evans
On 10/11/10 09:09, Teemu Suikki wrote: Why doesn't it match? The descriptions are 100% identical. Check your search timer's configuration for comparing 'sub-title' when avoiding repeats. Compare subtitle should be set to either 'No' or 'If present', otherwise the comparison will also return

Re: [vdr] Recordings Numbering

2010-11-10 Thread Ludwig Nussel
Udo Richter wrote: > Am 09.11.2010 16:35, schrieb Matthias Wächter: > > You just re-introduce the old problem. Don't ever re-number. If you > > don't renumber any SVDRP client can be safe in assuming for (nearly) any > > time span to mean the same recording as the server when it updates a > > recor