>From the auther of the atsc plugin:
Yes, that's from the plugin. To fix it, find the following line in VDR's
channels.c
Code:
dsyslog("changing pids of channel %d from %d+%d=%d:%s:%s:%d to
%d+%d=%d:%s:%s:%d", Number(), vpid, ppid, vtype, OldApidsBuf,
OldSpidsBuf, tpid, Vpid, Ppid, Vtype, NewAp
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:52:55 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> In fact, it isn't just Yesterday, the entire Freeview network has no EPG
> in VDR. I can tune to the channels though. The DVB-S EPG is present
> though.
I think what it's turned out to be was a problem in my channels.conf.
There was a bug
Dear list,
I was amazed how easy a Linux VDR can be set up, using (in my case)
Sidux (recent Debian sid packages). I installed several plugins, and
especially LIVE is what we need to have remote access via LAN.
There was no problem to use the online EPG in order to time recordings.
Also, it is
Hi,
I am still using 1.6.0-2 and have patched it for FullHD OSD (http://www.vdrportal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=79647&threadview=0&hilight=&hilightuser=0&page=1
). Frontend is xineliboutput-cvs (vdr-sxfe in other computer; tcp
connection) and skinenigmang-0.1.0 is in use. Everything seems f
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
"Gerald Dachs" wrote:
> > I take it you are using them on xinelib 1.2, are you using xineliboutput
> > 1.0.4 or cvs?
>
> I use 1.0.4, cvs has currently audio problems.
I use CVS with only slight glitches (sometimes the picture is not
deinterlaced prope
> I take it you are using them on xinelib 1.2, are you using xineliboutput
> 1.0.4 or cvs?
I use 1.0.4, cvs has currently audio problems.
Gerald
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 25/08/2009, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> 2009/8/25 Magnus Hörlin :
>
> >> Why is that an advantage of xine-vdr? I toggle between xineliboutput and
> >> xbmc.
>
>
> > Yes, so do I. I guess he's starting the frontend from vdr instead of doing
> > that separately.
>
>
> Have never tried xineliboutput,
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:48:21 +0200, Malte Schröder
wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:49:18 +0100
> scott wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I was thinking of giving xine/vdpau/xineliboutput another try after
>> failing earlier in the year. I came across these patches:
>>
>> http://www.nfvdr.net/bbs/thread-5856
2009/8/25 Magnus Hörlin :
>> Why is that an advantage of xine-vdr? I toggle between xineliboutput and
>> xbmc.
> Yes, so do I. I guess he's starting the frontend from vdr instead of doing
> that separately.
Have never tried xineliboutput, only xine-vdr.
--
-Tor
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] För Gerald
> Dachs
> Skickat: den 25 augusti 2009 10:05
> Till: VDR Mailing List
> Ämne: Re: [vdr] xineliboutput vs xine-vdr plugin
>
> > Am wondering if the xineliboutput is a tad better thant xin
> Am wondering if the xineliboutput is a tad better thant xine-vdr w/
> xine patched for vdpau?
>
> I currently use the latter, with the advantage that I can stop xine in
> order to run xbmc and possibly toggle between them using a lirc hotkey
> setup, all the while vdr runs all the time in the bac
[vdr] 1.7.9 patches
Thanks for the link Goga
The extensions patch there applied clean to vdr 1.7.9 but then enabling
SETUP = 1 and TTXTSUBS = 1 results in errors.
Did somebody manage to have somehow vdr 1.7.9 with SETUP and TTXTSUBS working?
___
vdr
Thanks for the link Goga
The extensions patch there applied clean to vdr 1.7.9 but then enabling
SETUP = 1 and TTXTSUBS = 1 results in errors.
Did somebody manager to have somehow vdr 1.7.9 with SETUP and TTXTSUBS working?
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@lin
13 matches
Mail list logo
