Re: [vdr] [FRC] Why are patches for framebuffer not needed anymore in release 0.1.0?

2009-03-29 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:32:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Does Lenny have some extra patches in the kernel, or does it work with all > vanilla 2.6.26+ kernels? for sure has Lenny some extra patches in the kernel. But probably they don't interfere with the vga-sync-fields (FRC) patch. I m

Re: [vdr] [FRC] Why are patches for framebuffer not needed anymore in release 0.1.0?

2009-03-29 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:34:30AM +0200, Thomas Hilber wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:21:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > you released version 0.1.0 [1]. Could you please explain to me, why the > > framebuffer patches (intelfb, radeonfb) are not needed anymore? > > since version 0.1.0 you

Re: [vdr] xinelibout --hud + xcompmgr = tearing

2009-03-29 Thread Alex Betis
2009/3/18 Jörn Reder > Alex Betis wrote: > > > I gave the nice xinelibout hud another try, but have to revert back since > > running composite manager > > creates tearing while watching movies. I've tries with xcompmgr with -n > > option. > > > > Does anybody know how to fix that? > > Or maybe t

Re: [vdr] [FRC] Why are patches for framebuffer not needed anymore in release 0.1.0?

2009-03-29 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:21:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > you released version 0.1.0 [1]. Could you please explain to me, why the > framebuffer patches (intelfb, radeonfb) are not needed anymore? since version 0.1.0 you will not need DRM from GIT anymore. You just can use DRM as provided by t