[EMAIL PROTECTED](Klaus Schmidinger) 02.12.07 14:47
>On 12/02/07 14:34, Darren Salt wrote:
>> I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
>>
>> [snip]
>>> While testing this, I found that on my system the monotonic clock
>>> only has a resolution of 4000250 ns (about 4 ms), wh
On Sunday 02 December 2007, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
>
> > On 12/02/07 14:34, Darren Salt wrote:
> >> I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
> >
> > I'll make it a 5 ms limit then, to allow default kernels to work.
>
On 12/02/07 16:09, Grégoire FAVRE wrote:
> On 02/12/2007, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Valid HZ options are 100, 250, 300 and 1000, unless overridden by an
>> arch-specific Kconfig file. (AFAICS, only mips does this, offering 48, 100,
>> 128, 250, 256, 1000 and 1024.)
>
> zen-sourc
Hi,
This problem is still unsolved.
When it happens the log shows:
> Dec 2 16:29:53 [vdr] [3188] switching to channel 2
> Dec 2 16:29:53 [logger] [4574] [input_vdr] UDP:65-65 missing, requested
> re-send for -1 frames
> Dec 2 16:29:53 [logger] [4574] [input_vdr] UDP:Got UDP MISSING 65-66
> (
On 02/12/2007, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valid HZ options are 100, 250, 300 and 1000, unless overridden by an
> arch-specific Kconfig file. (AFAICS, only mips does this, offering 48, 100,
> 128, 250, 256, 1000 and 1024.)
zen-sources which are a really good option for multimedia des
I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
> On 12/02/07 14:34, Darren Salt wrote:
>> I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
>> [snip]
>>> While testing this, I found that on my system the monotonic clock only
>>> has a resolution of 4000250 ns (about 4
On Sonntag, 2. Dezember 2007, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 12/02/07 14:34, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> While testing this, I found that on my system the monotonic clock only
> >> has a resolution of 4000250 ns (about
On 12/02/07 14:34, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
>> While testing this, I found that on my system the monotonic clock only has
>> a resolution of 4000250 ns (about 4 ms), which in your original patch would
>> have caused VDR not to u
I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
[snip]
> While testing this, I found that on my system the monotonic clock only has
> a resolution of 4000250 ns (about 4 ms), which in your original patch would
> have caused VDR not to use the monotonic clock.
That suggests that you
On 06/09/07 21:40, Petri Hintukainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 12:28 +0200, Udo Richter wrote:
>> And, from the original post:
>>> May 31 20:23:38 localhost vdr: [3413] System Time = Thu May 31 20:23:38
>>> 2007 (1180632218)
>>> May 31 20:23:38 localhost vdr: [3413] Local Time = Thu May 31 20
Stefan Hußfeldt a écrit :
> Juergen Sauer schrieb:
>
>> So, which remote boot capaple distri do you use ?
>> Which is best to choose ?
>
> I'm using debian (server, diskless client) with e-tobis VDR repository.Don't
> know, if it's the best...
> http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=
11 matches
Mail list logo