Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 11/16/07 19:46, Petri Helin wrote:
>> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>>> On 11/13/07 00:12, Petri Helin wrote:
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> So VDR just displays what the provider broadcasts - unless, of course,
> there is a bug in VDR's code, in which case you're
On 11/16/07 19:46, Petri Helin wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> On 11/13/07 00:12, Petri Helin wrote:
>>> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
So VDR just displays what the provider broadcasts - unless, of course,
there is a bug in VDR's code, in which case you're welcome to send a
fix.
>> Hm... I'm using a DVB-S FF card as TV-out and two budget DVB-T cards as the
>> input. I do not even have a sat dish. My FF does ONLY do TV-out.
>
> So the answer appears to be yes then. Thanks for clearing that up.
Great! This means, that I can go on with my budget-upgrade, the only issue
wi
Hi,
Klaus Schmidinger schrieb:
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:20:38AM -0800, VDR User wrote:
>>
>> I didn't try vdr-1.5.11 because there is no H.264 patch for it.
Well, I've spent some time with subtitles. Will switch to 1.5.11 this
weekend and supply new patches.
>> I really don't understand wh
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 11/13/07 00:12, Petri Helin wrote:
>> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>>> So VDR just displays what the provider broadcasts - unless, of course,
>>> there is a bug in VDR's code, in which case you're welcome to send a
>>> fix.
>>>
>> Well, it seems to work with live TV, but f
On Nov 16, 2007 8:48 AM, Jan Exner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm... I'm using a DVB-S FF card as TV-out and two budget DVB-T cards as the
> input. I do not even have a sat dish. My FF does ONLY do TV-out.
So the answer appears to be yes then. Thanks for clearing that up.
_
On 11/16/07 17:32, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:20:38AM -0800, VDR User wrote:
>
> I didn't try vdr-1.5.11 because there is no H.264 patch for it.
>
> I really don't understand why they are not investigated to be
> intregrated into vdr at this time as more and more TV are go
On 11/13/07 00:12, Petri Helin wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> On 11/12/07 20:11, Petri Helin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am wondering whether it would be possible to use full names instead of
>>> abbreviations for languages in audio and subtitle selectors? I am also
>>> wondering how the curre
Hi all,
> I don't think you can stream output from other devices thru the nexus
> tv-out but I am not 100% sure.
Hm... I'm using a DVB-S FF card as TV-out and two budget DVB-T cards as the
input. I do not even have a sat dish. My FF does ONLY do TV-out.
Cheers,
Jan
--
Jan Exner - [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:20:38AM -0800, VDR User wrote:
I didn't try vdr-1.5.11 because there is no H.264 patch for it.
I really don't understand why they are not investigated to be
intregrated into vdr at this time as more and more TV are going to go to
H.264 (not all in HDTV).
Let's hope tha
I don't think you can stream output from other devices thru the nexus
tv-out but I am not 100% sure. Regardless, why not just use your
budget card for dedicated recording and nexus for live tv? That would
eliminate the problem altogether.
I also just inquired about diseqc.conf supporting multipl
On Nov 16, 2007 2:52 AM, Petri Helin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That should be no problem. If a patch exists, a package developer
> could easily make use of and include it in the release. So there is no
> need for Klaus to add it in to the core VDR.
It's generally not a good idea to base your co
Hello,
I have a couple of questions about my future upgrading.
My VDR is running fine with a single Nexus-S for a couple of years. Beside
the VDR box I have another sat receiver, and I'm thinking about
integrating it in my VDR box via a budget (skystar2?) card.
My goal is:
1. - to have the ad
On Nov 15, 2007 9:03 PM, VDR User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lastly with regard to Petri's comment that, "But VDR does support
> h.264 broadcasts already, although with patching, but still. So there
> is no need for anyone to stop using VDR because of a lack of h.264
> support." I don't think an
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
> Some comments in this thread (and others) sound as if there is
> an imminent need to switch to HDTV/H.264, because otherwise we
> won't be able to watch tv any more within a few months. I don't
> see any real incentive in taking all the extra efforts to do
> HDTV. The
No way, I have installed xubuntu with truetype fonts, so that is not a
reason.
Yarema
Luca Olivetti wrote:
> El Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:58:43 +0100
> YUP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>> I successfully compiled dxr3 plugin from cvs (stable at it was
>> described here http://www.linuxtv.org/vdrw
VDR User wrote:
> Also, I talk with many dvb users on pretty much a daily basis and I've
> never once heard someone say they've left VDR for that other software
> because of eye-candy/UI. Most people seem to be concerned with
> capability & functionality, not pretty graphics.
>
> My personal opini
17 matches
Mail list logo
