Re: [vdr] Not good behaviour from vdr

2007-10-09 Thread VDR User
Yesturday I had the same problem where a very bad but short storm caused my signal to drop and vdr again performed an emergency exit when it wasn't wanted. I already commented out the EmergencyExit request in recorder.c but this time it was generated in remux.c by: if (!synced && skipped >= 0)

Re: [vdr] Not good behaviour from vdr

2007-10-09 Thread Kartsa
Rainer Zocholl: > That's long time ago and IMHO only a problem on unmodded v1.3 cards or > "not perfect" ARM firmware at that time, 3 or more years ago > (At least i got rid of the problem by -expensive- upgrading to 2.0 cards. > (Someone interessted in 1.3 cards, 220E each?)). > (see http://vdr-w

Re: [vdr] diff and po-files = huge patches?

2007-10-09 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Torsten Kunkel may or may not have written... > while working on a patch I noticed a small problem creating such a patch > with the "new" translation. > When adding new translations, you have to call "make i18n" in order to get > the translation generated to the gettext-files, but wh

Re: [vdr] diff and po-files = huge patches?

2007-10-09 Thread Torsten Kunkel
> I've noticed this, too, and will make it so that the line numbers will > no longer be added to the *.po files by using the --no-location option. Ah ok, then sorry for bothering you :) ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bi

Re: [vdr] diff and po-files = huge patches?

2007-10-09 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 10/09/2007 08:23 AM, Torsten Kunkel wrote: > Hi, > while working on a patch I noticed a small problem creating such a patch > with the "new" translation. > When adding new translations, you have to call "make i18n" in order to get > the translation generated to the gettext-files, but when doing