Re: [vdr] [PATCH] limit streamdev client's ringbuffer timeouts to more sane values

2007-04-07 Thread Stone
> Is this patch for streamdev a direct result from selecting the new > "Tickless System (Dynamic Ticks)" option in kernel 2.6.21? If yes, then CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS "High Resolution Timer Support". Whether NO_HZ makes a difference I'm not sure, i ran into this w/ both options on. (launching "ni

[vdr] [BUG] check terminal access

2007-04-07 Thread Stefan Huelswitt
Hi, I think there is a bug in the RW access check for a terminal given with commandline option -t. The check is performed before VDR actualy switches his uid, so if the user which starts VDR has access rights and the effective vdr user doesn't have, the check is useless. In addition VDR should chec

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] limit streamdev client's ringbuffer timeouts to more sane values

2007-04-07 Thread Artur Skawina
Stone wrote: > > Is this patch for streamdev a direct result from selecting the new > "Tickless System (Dynamic Ticks)" option in kernel 2.6.21? If yes, then CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS "High Resolution Timer Support". Whether NO_HZ makes a difference I'm not sure, i ran into this w/ both options on.