CK 15
+
#define MAX_DIR_NAME 300
typedef struct {
int level_cur;
diff -rcN vpopmail-4.8.9.orig/file_lock.c vpopmail-4.8.9/file_lock.c
*** vpopmail-4.8.9.orig/file_lock.c Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
--- vpopmail-4.8.9/file_lock.c Fri Aug 18 07:32:33 2000
***
*** 0
--- 1,50
+
I should probably mention the whole fact about ECamp
(www.ecamp.net/www.myecamp.com) paying my time and all that stuff
ok
Take it easy fellahs,
Eric
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Eric Peters wrote:
> I havn't tested this much any feedback would be good but after adding
> 100,000 uers and
define old password new password examples
i believe only teh first 8 characters in a password are unique - any
additional characters are fluff
that this case?
Eric
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Da M. Kadre wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?
> I have changed users passwords with ./vpasswd and you
#define MAX_DIR_NAME 300
typedef struct {
int level_cur;
diff -rcN vpopmail-4.8.9.orig/file_lock.c vpopmail-4.8.9/file_lock.c
*** vpopmail-4.8.9.orig/file_lock.c Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
--- vpopmail-4.8.9/file_lock.c Fri Aug 18 07:32:33 2000
***
*** 0
--- 1,50
+
go for it :) I ripped most of the code straight outa Advanced Programming
in the UNIX Environment by W Richard Stevens : )
Eric
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Ken Jones wrote:
> Eric Peters wrote:
> >
> > Hey all
> >
> > I have a small fix from the last I sent out (I realiz
hypocrit : )
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Ryan Hayle wrote:
> An urgent plea--it's quite annoying. Especially since my mail filter only
> uses the first email address it finds, I end up with 2 copies of every
> message in the same folder--it's a waste and just plain annoying! Very few
> questions ap
the also totalably notable thing is you can use [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
many email clients (eudora just does fucked up shit)
but i belive it works in outlook - anywhere where the input field is
suppose to just be the username
Eric
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Emiliano wrote:
> Mark Chesney wrote:
>
> >
as with all great feature requests they tend to be accompanied by patches
which contain their implementation :)
Eric
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Mark Chesney wrote:
> currently, in order to avoid the %domain pop user naming scheme, the only
> choice is ip aliasing, which requires an ip for each and
ken, he's wanting something where you could still have
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" be two different "unique" login accts
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
so you could have a "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" would be the physical pop
login "pop01"
where [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be the physical pop login
"pop02"
as I suggested
define what you mean pattern - a reg exp - not really possible to do in
mysql i believe (though i could be wrong) - just look for a string? -
definatley easy to do then
Eric
-- Support your government, give Echelon / Carnivore something to parse --
classfield top-secret government restricted
10 matches
Mail list logo
