Jacob Scott wrote:
>
> the FAQ mentions vchkpw compatabilty
> (http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/faq.html#a2) but looks
> out of date. I have downloaded the source and the documentation is not
> so great =(.
Actually, that was a fairly recent hack. We were still using an older
ve
Ken Jones wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what these patches are for, and how we can incorporate
> them into the standard vpopmail release. Any ideas?
Just contributing changes back to the collective knowledge pool.
Depending upon how your mailer handles attachments, you may need to use
the --ignore-wh
Ken Jones wrote:
>
> Does anyone have vpopmail working with smtp authentication?
A couple of weeks ago, I posted an updated patch to let smtp-auth use
vpopmail 4.8.6 for authentication. The original instructions are still
at http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/faq.html .
> I'm try
Ken Jones wrote:
>
> I got it working. If I run qmail-smtpd as the vpopmail user,
> then there is no need for the patch to vchkpw.c
Well, it all depends upon how you feel about allowing qmail-smtpd access
to all of the vpopmail user's files and if you have any other files that
are only accessibl
Ben Beuchler wrote:
> Is anyone still maintaining the PAM patch? We are considering some
> changes to our user management and authenticating against PAM would sure
> be helpful...
>
It's not being maintained in the traditional sense (ie, I'm not
releasing a pam patch for each vpopmail release
