ed wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:53:31 +1000
Quey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S. does 'wizzard' work on your sendmail?
whats wizzard? I've heard of it, but I've heard of several things
called wizzrd, each to their own.
It's a shell exploit for sendmail. Some versions o
Christopher Chan wrote:
Quey wrote:
ed wrote:
I think you should off load the processing work. Look into running a
remote clamd/spamassing, or setup multiple mail hubs jms has a guide on
that at http://qmail.jms1.net
I agree he needs to offload, but the jms1 way seems very cumbersome.
We
What do you use for recipient verification on sendmail?
milter-sav (in recipient mode only)
cor...everything sendmail related is now done in milters...no surprise
that postfix has milter support. Now if someone makes a mitler patch or
a qmail-milter release after DJB puts qmail into the
Quey wrote:
ed wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:53:31 +1000
Quey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S. does 'wizzard' work on your sendmail?
whats wizzard? I've heard of it, but I've heard of several things
called wizzrd, each to their own.
It's a shell exploit for sendmail. Some
Hi,
I upgraded to 5.4.25 from 5.5.1 and today I have had reports of
intermittent POP3 collection. Users will get prompted for their username
and password and the next minute the request goes through ok. There are
around a max peak of 28 to 30 concurrent collections out of a possible
90 so thats
On 11/9/2007 4:10 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
on Solaris 9, i see:
[...]
vdelivermail.c:910: warning: implicit declaration of function `setenv'
[...]
besides the obvious, what's setenv? Who has this and where? Is there a
clear way around this ?
apparently, setenv isn't near as portable as it
