[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If I had a server hardware failure... and my hardware breaks... so I need
> to set up a new one qmail server... what should I have backed up in my
> actual qmail server and how could I recover all data?
see http://qmail.jms1.net/backup.shtml ... explained in full.
>
OK then so I could have a box in wich I do...
take qmail sources and patch them with johns (great and nice) patch...
make setup check and ./config-fast fqdn
after this
after this
change /var/qmail for /var/qmail-scanning-server in conf-local... and again
./config-fast fqdn
after this setup pro
Thanks a lot John... you're work in qmail is excellent truthly...
congratulations mate truthly...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> If I had a server hardware failure... and my hardware breaks... so I
>> need
>> to set up a new one qmail server... what should I have backed up in my
>> actual qmail
On Friday 09 November 2007 04:52:16 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK then so I could have a box in wich I do...
>
> take qmail sources and patch them with johns (great and nice) patch...
>
> make setup check and ./config-fast fqdn
> after this
>
> after this
>
> change /var/qmail for /var/qmail-sca
Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using
vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I add
the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an smtproutes line
(in this control file) as domain.com:mail.domain.com but the mail always
is treated as
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:58:43 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using
> vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I
> add the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an
> smtproutes line (in this con
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:53:31 +1000
Quey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > P.S. does 'wizzard' work on your sendmail?
> >
> >
>
> whats wizzard? I've heard of it, but I've heard of several things
> called wizzrd, each to their own.
It's a shell exploit for sendmail. Some versions of sendmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using
vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I add
the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an smtproutes line
(in this control file) as domain.com:mail.domain.com but th
ed wrote:
In order to accept the mail, the domains in question should exist in:
/v/q/c/virtualdomains
/v/q/c/rcpthosts
Then the domains should also exist in
/v/q/u/assign
Which should also be compiled to a cdb
/v/q/u/cdb
(check that the two have similar information)
Then you shou
Hi,
I just upgraded from VPopmail 5.5.1 to 5.4.25. 5.5.1 was part of the
original OpenEFilter package Inter 7 provide which was working fine in
terms of calling spamc but had a bug in vchkpw.
Now that bug has been fixed but its not calling spamc even though I have
compiled it with -enable-s
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:15:53 -0500
Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, if the domain is in /v/q/c/virtualdomains then the smtproutes
> file will not be looked at.
My mistake
--
The cup and string to the moon pop is spiking because of TK421 not
being at his post. Verio is playing NF
hi,
> Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using
> vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I add
> the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an smtproutes line
> (in this control file) as domain.com:mail.domain.com but the mail always
Hi,
I sorted this. It needs to run SPAMD as a daemon now so that spamc can
connect to it.
Cheers
Matt
From: Matthew Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 November 2007 14:20
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.25 and Spamassassin
Hi,
I just upgraded from
Hi,
I have vpopmail running with smtp-after-pop functionality
(--enable-roaming-users). the pop-daemon is from qmail. this works fine for
normal (unsecure) connection via port 110. but this doesn't work if
connecting via strunnel on port 995. I know, thats correct, because stunnel
is connectin
I've recently noticed strange behavior with user quotas after an upgrade
to vpopmail 5.4.25 from 5.4.18. The upgrade also moved from the cdb
backend to the MySQL backend (due to locking issues I was experiencing).
When delivering a message, the size of the message is placed twice in
maildirsize. W
ckubu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have vpopmail running with smtp-after-pop functionality
> (--enable-roaming-users). the pop-daemon is from qmail. this works fine for
> normal (unsecure) connection via port 110. but this doesn't work if
> connecting via strunnel on port 995. I know, thats correct, beca
Hello all;
I am trying to move from a qmailrocks server to a newer qmailtoaster-iso
server but I am having problems moving the domains over to the qmailtoaster
machine. I have the two machines running, qmailrocks is the production
machine, qmailtoaster is the new machine. I would like to make sur
On Friday 09 November 2007, Michael Johnson wrote:
> I've recently noticed strange behavior with user quotas after an upgrade
> to vpopmail 5.4.25 from 5.4.18. The upgrade also moved from the cdb
> backend to the MySQL backend (due to locking issues I was experiencing).
>
> When delivering a messag
Steve Cole wrote:
> On Friday 09 November 2007, Michael Johnson wrote:
>> I've recently noticed strange behavior with user quotas after an upgrade
>> to vpopmail 5.4.25 from 5.4.18. The upgrade also moved from the cdb
>> backend to the MySQL backend (due to locking issues I was experiencing).
>>
>>
when trying to compile either 5.4.25 or 5.4.26 with:
./configure \
--disable-md5-passwords \
--disable-roaming-users \
--enable-logging=v \
--disable-rebuild-tcpserver-file \
--enable-qmail-ext \
--disable-clear-passwd
on Solaris 9, i see:
gcc -I. -Icdb -I. -I. -I. -g -O2 -Wall -c vde
Michael Johnson wrote:
What version and backend are you using? The better it can be narrowed,
the easier it will be to determine what change broke it.
For me, 5.4.25 with MySQL 5.0x
I started to see this with *.25 but I did jump a number of versions when
I took the plunge on .25.
!DSPAM
21 matches
Mail list logo
