[vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform

Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit? Thank you Joao

Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform

João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit? Thank you Joao I am running qmail on two SunFire servers under FreeBSD 64 with no issues and wonderful performance. I'd try it. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't hav

Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform

Hi DAve, Thank you! Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: "DAve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.25 released

Is there any way to start getting SHA or even MD5 sums in these announcements ? Sourceforge has been cracked a few times so it makes me leary everytime. -- ~Allie D. On Tue, October 9, 2007 20:28, Rick Widmer wrote: > http://vpopmail.sf.net/ > > 5.4.25 - released 9-Oct-07 > > Release Notes: > >

Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance

Hi Tren, Thank you! I´m testing the sysstat Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: "Tren Blackburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:51 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance -Original Message- From: João Luiz - Terra [mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.25 released

BTW...I installed 5.4.25 and qmailadmin (1.2.11) is behaving well, I'll ping the list if I see any issues. -- ~Allie D. On Tue, October 9, 2007 20:28, Rick Widmer wrote: > http://vpopmail.sf.net/ > > 5.4.25 - released 9-Oct-07 > > Release Notes: > > Another attempt at fixing some warnings in mai

[vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

Hi all, I read that the clamav version clamav: 0.90.2 has a bad performance. Is right? Which the better version of clamav? See: http://www.google.com/search?hl=pt-BR&rlz=1T4GGIH_pt-BRBR206BR207&q=clamav%3A+0.90.2+slow&meta= Thank you Joao

[vchkpw] busy try again later error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been running into an issue on our mail server recently. As traffic has been increasing on it, I've been getting the response that I listed in the subject more often, and now customers are also seeing it (busy try again later!). Of course, this res

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

Michael Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been running into an issue on our mail server recently. As traffic has been increasing on it, I've been getting the response that I listed in the subject more often, and now customers are also seeing it (busy try again lat

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

I don't have that file, so I'm using the default (7200 then). How would this have an effect on POP3 connections? ___ Michael Johnson 909-740-3156 x3163 System Administrator [EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

Michael Johnson wrote: I don't have that file, so I'm using the default (7200 then). How would this have an effect on POP3 connections? ___ Michael Johnson 909-740-3156 x3163 System Administrator

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

Rick Macdougall wrote: > Michael Johnson wrote: >> I don't have that file, so I'm using the default (7200 then). >> >> How would this have an effect on POP3 connections? >> ___ >> Michael Johnson 909-74

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

Michael Johnson wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: I've been running into an issue on our mail server recently. As traffic has been increasing on it, I've been getting the response that I listed in the subject more often, and now customers are also seeing it (busy try again later!). Of course, this

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

Rick Macdougall wrote: > > And you have about 6K users ??? Our server with about 30K users almost > never goes over 40 concurrent connections, and we do have quite a few > users checking every minute. > > Are you sure there isn't some issue with authentication or perhaps I/O > that is slowing do

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

maybe you would get an answer if you asked on clamav list ;-) João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, I read that the clamav version clamav: 0.90.2 has a bad performance. Is right? Which the better version of clamav? See: http://www.google.com/search?hl=pt-BR&rlz=1T4GGIH_pt-BRBR206BR207&q=clama

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

Sorry :( Do you know the address of clamav list? Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Quey To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:21 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow? maybe you would get an answer if you asked on clamav list ;-)

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

If you goto www.clamav.net there is a link to it. I heard they corrected the problem you mention in current, but clam is still way to slow compared to other scanners so I don't use it anymore. Q João Luiz - Terra wrote: Sorry :( Do you know the address of clamav list? Regards, Joao

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

On Wednesday 10 October 2007 08:13:29 pm Quey wrote: > If you goto www.clamav.net there is a link to it. > I heard they corrected the problem you mention in current, but clam is > still way to slow compared to other scanners so I don't use it anymore. > Q > Are you using clamscan or clamd/clamdscan

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

Joshua Megerman wrote: On Wednesday 10 October 2007 08:13:29 pm Quey wrote: If you goto www.clamav.net there is a link to it. I heard they corrected the problem you mention in current, but clam is still way to slow compared to other scanners so I don't use it anymore. Q Are you using cl

[vchkpw] qmailadmin "invalid user"

Hi, Sorry. My english is not good :) I am using qmail toaster. (http://www.shupp.org/toaster) After the installation, it is all certainty smtp, pop3, webmail, but qmailadmin does not function. I enter postmaster, domain and password, but it returns "invalid user". Can you help me? Regards, Joao