Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.20 released

2007-08-23 Thread Quey
Steve Cole wrote: On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Rick Widmer wrote: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ 5.4.20 - released 21-Aug-07 Feels odd to ask this, but in the UPGRADE document, it lists the "pw_domain" columns as requiring updates, but my databases have just "domain" in them except for the

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.20 released

2007-08-23 Thread Quey
Quey wrote: Rick ? Is this correct or should we be doing something else like Tony asked and renaming all domains to pw_domains ? my bad, I was talking to Tony, I meant what Steve asked? :) ( it is early you know hehe)

[vchkpw] change Log_ service

2007-08-23 Thread Quey
Is there an easy way to have logging go to another service like local1, local3 etc without having to massively edit all LOG_'s ? I'd rather use messages file for real system stuff only, and its at a time where I need to enable logging for helpdesk staff. Thanks Q

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and postfix

2007-08-23 Thread Christopher Chan
Quey wrote: Hi All, Currently we have a large setup of domains and users, we have a couple of qmail boxes, which are fed by front line sendmail boxes, since its a sinch to have all todays modern anti-spam and whatever else, this way qmail machines only ever see real email (apart from answerin

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and postfix

2007-08-23 Thread Quey
Christopher Chan wrote: I think it is your subconscious dislike of postfix that is preventing you from exploring postfix and really make full use of its capabilities. possibly, it may have a lot to do with all the postfix spammers, " oh why use sendmail piss it off use postfix its better"

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and postfix

2007-08-23 Thread Christopher Chan
Quey wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: I think it is your subconscious dislike of postfix that is preventing you from exploring postfix and really make full use of its capabilities. possibly, it may have a lot to do with all the postfix spammers, " oh why use sendmail piss it off use postfi