Re: [vchkpw] Rules on linking against the vpopmail libraries

On Jun 24, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Tom Collins wrote: On Jun 24, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Rick Widmer wrote: Selling a commercial product that includes vpopmail code is exactly what the GPL license is designed to prevent. Why should you get to sell our labor without paying us? What if QmailAdmin had

[vchkpw] Vpopmail/QMail relay local mail to another server mail ??

Currently, I had a Qmail Server in Fedora 4 and MDeaemon in Windows 2003. In MDaemon, I store all email acount in my network. Now I have some email acounts in QMail ( they're also same name with account in MDaemon). I have a problem like this: I use VPoppmail to create mydomain.com and add this n

Re: [vchkpw] Rules on linking against the vpopmail libraries

Tom Collins wrote: On Jun 24, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Rick Widmer wrote: Selling a commercial product that includes vpopmail code is exactly what the GPL license is designed to prevent. Why should you get to sell our labor without paying us? What if QmailAdmin had been written as a proprietary,

[vchkpw] Re: Vpopmail/QMail relay local mail to another server mail ??

Dear all, I correct something in the first email Exactly: file virtualdomains -> mydomain.com:mydomain.com When I post the first email I had modify to mydomain.com so it's not working, VPopMail not delivery email to local anymore. Now I modify again file virtualdomains -> mydomain.com:mydomain.

[vchkpw] Re: Vpopmail/QMail relay local mail to another server mail ??

Hi, ,- - [ Le lundi 25 juin 2007 vers 10:12 Hoang An écrivait: ] - - | > Currently, I had a Qmail Server in Fedora 4 and MDeaemon in Windows 2003. > But when user1 send to user3, QMail return error ->> > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mydomain.com . > I'm afraid I wasn'

Re: [vchkpw] Rules on linking against the vpopmail libraries

On Jun 25, 2007, at 1:58 AM, Rick Widmer wrote: I think it would because QmailAdmin includes vpopmail code at the linker level which requires it to be under the GPL license too. Late linking with .so files is acceptable, because the product does not include GPL code, and only links to an ex