On 2006-04-02, at 0829, Rick Widmer wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-04-01, at 0547, Rick Widmer wrote:
I was planning if you would like a way to see if a user exists
without returning anything else...
that's certainly a possibility, easy enough to add... should that
be available to a
John Simpson wrote:
> and since i now have two different patches for vpopmail, it's time to
> create a new web page to hold them. both patches are available from
> this page, which includes basic documentation for the new features.
>
>http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/vpopmail.html
Actually its
Rick Widmer wrote:
>
> I was under the impression your interest is based on Robin Bowes
> suggestion about the validrcptto.cdb patch, so it is "does this mailbox
> exist." We may as well make it easy, it should be a popular function.
Yes - having this functionality would obviate the need to mai
On Apr 3, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Robin Bowes wrote:
Rick Widmer wrote:
I was under the impression your interest is based on Robin Bowes
suggestion about the validrcptto.cdb patch, so it is "does this
mailbox
exist." We may as well make it easy, it should be a popular
function.
Yes - having thi
On 2006-04-03, at 0727, Rick Widmer wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
> and since i now have two different patches for vpopmail, it's
time to > create a new web page to hold them. both patches are
available from
> this page, which includes basic documentation for the new features.
>
>http://qmail
On 2006-04-03, at 0824, Robin Bowes wrote:
Rick Widmer wrote:
I was under the impression your interest is based on Robin Bowes
suggestion about the validrcptto.cdb patch, so it is "does this
mailbox
exist." We may as well make it easy, it should be a popular
function.
Yes - having this
On 2006-04-03, at 1159, Tom Collins wrote:
On Apr 3, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Robin Bowes wrote:
Rick Widmer wrote:
I was under the impression your interest is based on Robin Bowes
suggestion about the validrcptto.cdb patch, so it is "does this
mailbox
exist." We may as well make it easy, it shou
John Simpson wrote:
>
> (2) have qmail-smtpd open a socket to a vpopmaild service, or a
> courierauthd service (i wrote a simple widget which handles the
> "login", "help", and "quit" commands, but uses courier-authlib instead
> of libvpopmail) and uses that to verify the ID and password which
Hi, there is any rule to put in ~vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp for one user has
been authenticated not be IP checked on rblsmtpd ? I think that can be
possible using environment variables, may not.
Something like this:
111.111.111.111:allow,RBLSMTPD=""
Thanks a lot,
Fernando Milovich
On 2006-04-03, at 1609, Robin Bowes wrote:
This is how I've implemented a plugin for qpsmtpd that auths against
vpopmaild.
It's extremely easy:
# create socket
my $vpopmaild_socket = IO::Socket::INET->new(PeerAddr =>
vpopmaild_host,
PeerPort =>
On 2006-04-03, at 1024, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, there is any rule to put in ~vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp for one user
has
been authenticated not be IP checked on rblsmtpd ?
if by "authenticated" you mean that their IP address matches a
certain line, yes. the example you include...
111.111
I mean bypass RBL is the client is authenticated. But it seems to be no
possibly.
This problem is because our customers use ISP connections like ADSL and Dial
Up and these connections are blocked by CBL at spamhaus.org
I think i´ll have to change the RBL checker.
Thanks so much.
- Original
Hi,
El Miércoles, 5 de Abril de 2006 06:02, Fernando Milovich escribió:
> I mean bypass RBL is the client is authenticated. But it seems to be no
> possibly.
> This problem is because our customers use ISP connections like ADSL and Dial
> Up and these connections are blocked by CBL at spamhaus.o
13 matches
Mail list logo
