Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

>> * Uncomment the following define if you want chkuser ALWAYS enabled. >> * If uncommented, it will check for rcpt existance despite any >> .qmail-default >> * setting. >> * So, unsomments this if you are aware that ALL rcpt in all domains >> will be >> * ALWAYS checked. >> */ >> #define CH

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

At 08.26 14/09/2005, you wrote: >> * Uncomment the following define if you want chkuser ALWAYS enabled. >> * If uncommented, it will check for rcpt existance despite any >> .qmail-default >> * setting. >> * So, unsomments this if you are aware that ALL rcpt in all domains >> will be >> * AL

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

Hello, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > At 08.26 14/09/2005, you wrote: > >> >> * Uncomment the following define if you want chkuser ALWAYS enabled. >> >> * If uncommented, it will check for rcpt existance despite any >> >> .qmail-default >> >> * setting. >> >> * So, unsomments this if you are a

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser vpopmail and catch alls

At 10.58 14/09/2005, you wrote: Hello, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > At 08.26 14/09/2005, you wrote: > >> >> * Uncomment the following define if you want chkuser ALWAYS enabled. >> >> * If uncommented, it will check for rcpt existance despite any >> >> .qmail-default >> >> * setting. >> >> *

[vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch

Hi Guys, Matt Brookings told me at EMPF mailing list that the chkuser patch can be used to implement smtp authentication, but I never read in any place that chkuser could be used for that. If it really can, could someone point me for a documentation on this subject? At least in the chkuser

Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch

Bruno Negrao wrote: Hi Guys, Matt Brookings told me at EMPF mailing list that the chkuser patch can be used to implement smtp authentication, but I never read in any place that chkuser could be used for that. If it really can, could someone point me for a documentation on this subject? At

Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch

Hi Dave, I just discovered that the chkuser-2.0.8b-release ships with a netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2.0.8.patch. Maybe this is the patch Matt is referring to. And I'm not sure, but I guess that this patch is Dr Erwin's auth patch(the one shipped in vpopmail's contrib directory) but with

Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch

At 15.53 14/09/2005, you wrote: Hi Dave, I just discovered that the chkuser-2.0.8b-release ships with a netqmail-1.05_auth-0.4.2_chkuser-2.0.8.patch. Maybe this is the patch Matt is referring to. vpopmail ships with an auth patch in the contrib directory. That chkuser version was adapted to that

Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch

Thanks Tony. Now I understood.   So I conclude that Matt was mistaken when he told that chkuser could do smtp-authentication. Is that right Matt?   Regards, bnegrao   - Original Message - From: tonix (Antonio Nati) To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 200

Re: [vchkpw] Rsync concerns

I had already tried this, however, I pipe the output of the command to a log file which I check most days to ensure it is still working. For some reason the errors don't go to the log but get sent to root. If I use -q I get no output in the log even. Hi Andrew, Well, it seems to be a silly

Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Negrao wrote: > Thanks Tony. Now I understood. > > So I conclude that Matt was mistaken when he told that chkuser could do > smtp-authentication. Is that right Matt? No, you were mistaken when you thought I meant the chkusr patch did SMTP auth

RE: [vchkpw] Rsync concerns

Hi, Thanks - will try this. Actually my LDAP post was regarding using LDAP as authentication for another program which only uses LDAP. I want to try and do LDAP lookups on the SMTP envelope on another gateway product before forwarding it to Qmail. I am still wanting to use maildirs (of course!)

[vchkpw] safe to use with courier's authdaemon?

Hello, I haven't posted on this list in a while. I'm currently running 5.4.6. It looks like two separate versions of vpopmail are being maintained. A "Stable" version (5.4.x) on sourceforge, and... I see mention of a 5.5 version with a vpopmaild from a thread back in August 2005, but I can't find

Re: [vchkpw] Using chkuser as 'smtp-authentication' mechanism. WAS: [empf] Choosing a good SMTP_AUTH patch

No, you were mistaken when you thought I meant the chkusr patch did SMTP authentication. I said it works *with* SMTP authentication. The mistake I made, earlier, is that I replied with a chkusr patch link instead of SMTP authentication :) My bad! Ah! heheheheh. :-) No problem. bruno.

Re: [vchkpw] safe to use with courier's authdaemon?

Jesse Guardiani wrote: Hello, I haven't posted on this list in a while. I'm currently running 5.4.6. It looks like two separate versions of vpopmail are being maintained. A "Stable" version (5.4.x) on sourceforge, and... I see mention of a 5.5 version with a vpopmaild from a thread back in Augus

Re: [vchkpw] safe to use with courier's authdaemon?

- Original Message - From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Jesse 1.) I'm due for another round of mail server upgrades, and I've noticed that courier imap on Gentoo is now more or less demanding authdaemon support. Courier-IMAP v4.x no longer runs without authdaemon. The au