In the kernel, is UFS_DIRHASH enabled, or whatever the option is? This
caused a lot of trouble on another server i admin, where it would be
so slow, that at times login sporadically failed. It is enabled by
default, and it would be stupid to have been removed, but you never
know.
Hm...I'm prett
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:57:06 -0600
Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had to kill this mail... 2.5MB email to the vchkpw mailing list
> (over 1100 subscribers) kills our puny 400kbit upstream :( Please
> don't send such large messages to the list.. it's much better to put
> them up on
hello, i've a little problem with the smtp authentication.
if a user try to send a mail without authentication mode it work!
Can i force to use only the auth mode ??
if i telnet on the port 25 i have this result
250- -=NO UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL=-
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE 0
250 AUTH LOG
Title: Message
Hi
I tried sending few mails to that account
.The usage increase from that 15% to above. When I delete the mails still the
usage shows 15% and not 0%. Even
some other email accounts which were working properly now started showing usage
16% even if I delete all mails.
> Yes. I'm suggesting that we could use directory names outside of the
> user namespace so that you could have bigdir support and one-character
> email addresses at the same time.
>
> It would be difficult to handle existing domains though... There would
> need to be a lot of directory renaming a
On Nov 30, 2004, at 1:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05.24 30/11/2004, you wrote:
During development of 1.2, we combined aliases and forwards into one.
You can now have addresses that forward to multiple addresses, either
local or remote.
This is nice but i need to limit aliases and forwards fo
On Nov 30, 2004, at 5:48 AM, Gajen Anandamuruga wrote:
I tried sending few mails to that account .The usage increase from
that 15% to above. When I delete the mails still the usage shows 15%
and not 0%. Even some other email accounts which were working
properly now started showing usage 16% eve
On Nov 30, 2004, at 4:00 AM, signo wrote:
if i telnet on the port 25 i have this result
250- -=NO UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL=-
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE 0
250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
thanks, signo
That doesn't look like qmail, but maybe you've just got a patched up
version.
What SMTP AUTH patch
John Berliner wrote:
In the kernel, is UFS_DIRHASH enabled, or whatever the option is? This
caused a lot of trouble on another server i admin, where it would be
so slow, that at times login sporadically failed. It is enabled by
default, and it would be stupid to have been removed, but you never
Please use your MUA's 'new' function to start new threads. You read a post,
clicked reply, removed the subject and body, and typed in your new message.
This is bad because those of us who have mail clients with threading support,
as well as the list archives, will be broken.
Evidence of your
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 01:33 am, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:57:06 -0600
>
> Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had to kill this mail... 2.5MB email to the vchkpw mailing list
> > (over 1100 subscribers) kills our puny 400kbit upstream :( Please
> > don't send s
On Nov 30, 2004, at 8:32 AM, Tom Collins wrote:
How do you define an alias vs. a forward? Do you count the number of
email addresses the customer can create, or the number of addresses
each message forwards to?
This should have gone to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list -- if you're
interested in the t
On Nov 30, 2004, at 11:49 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
John Berliner wrote:
In the kernel, is UFS_DIRHASH enabled, or whatever the option is?
This caused a lot of trouble on another server i admin, where it
would be so slow, that at times login sporadically failed. It is
enabled by default, and
On Nov 30, 2004, at 11:43 AM, Tom Collins wrote:
On Nov 30, 2004, at 5:48 AM, Gajen Anandamuruga wrote:
I tried sending few mails to that account .The usage increase from
that 15% to above. When I delete the mails still the usage shows 15%
and not 0%. Even some other email accounts which were wo
14 matches
Mail list logo
