Jeremy:
Here is the header & I have unscribed it. Few suggestion for the future:
(1) Update the we site:
http://www.inter7.com/?page=vpopmail
and just below where it says "subscribe" add a line which says
"un-subscribe. Most web sites do that!
(2) Mention to "look into the message header" somew
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with
> postfix MTA :-)
Yes! I keep saying that. I had heard that there is work going on to create
an abstraction layer between vpopmail and qmail (i.e. vpop
What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with
> postfix MTA :-)
Yes! I keep saying that. I ha
On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need
to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :)
> At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
> >- Orig
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Are you being sarcastic?
-Steve
> At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
I just converted my vpopmail install to use MySQL in preparation for
setting up a nice admin screen for my users, and noticed something.
Some of my users have a rather odd quota setting, while others have
what looks right.
Normal: 1
Odd: 3000,1000C
What's up with the second one? I ca
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
>
> Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need
> to patch Postfix. Patches suck.
At 08:39 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need
to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :)
well, qmail isn't
At 08:41 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Are you being sarcastic?
no.
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://www.smileglobal.com
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Ess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ooh... While we're at it, we could add vpopmail support for sendmail...
Once vpopmail is abstracted from qmail that would be easy. :)
I fully realize that everyone who uses vpopmail also uses qmail. Me too. A
lot of people lik
On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:42 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
Some of my users have a rather odd quota setting, while others have
what looks right.
Normal: 1
Odd: 3000,1000C
What's up with the second one? I can't find any documentation about
that syntax anywhere. Is it valid? And if so, what does i
Ahha. Thanks for filling me in on that. I would guess it probably
assumes a number is 'S' if it isn't specified, so that syntax would
still be valid.
At least now I know I'm not going crazy. ;)
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:18:14 -0700, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:42 AM,
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
>
>
> Am Mi, den 08.09.2004 schrieb Michael Bowe um 23:20:
>
> > But! whenever I
Am Do, den 09.09.2004 schrieb Tom Collins um 18:18:
> On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:42 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
> > Some of my users have a rather odd quota setting, while others have
> > what looks right.
> >
> > Normal: 1
> > Odd: 3000,1000C
> >
> > What's up with the second one? I can't find
At 9/8/2004 11:14 AM, you wrote:
on sep 8, 2004, at 10:24 am, tom harrison wrote:
*
locals:
messages for mail.ts5.com are delivered locally.
*
that resulted in error messages of the form:
*
@4000413decc0152edbf4 starting delivery 24: msg 3794106 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40004
Hi, i've my server with qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail; it works fine, but within
sqwebmail if i send a new message, this goes to the sent folder, but qmail
does not send the message, as i can see in the log: no entry for the sent
message, no errors.
I've tryed to reinstall sqwebmail, but the problem pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't think you're reading this right... seems to be forged to me,
unless your mail server is at 80.8.104.163 and it is hosted in france.
What I'd start doing is publishing SPF records. It might help some with
the joe-job.
- -Myron
> Hello Group,
QmailAdmin doesn't seem to handle Message Count quotas. At least, my
version doesn't, and I'm pretty sure it's got everything turned on. ;)
I did have one more question.
Does vpopmail+mysql properly support per-domain quotas?
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 19:01:34 +0200, Rainer Duffner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 09 September 2004 1:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi, i've my server with qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail; it works fine, but within
> sqwebmail if i send a new message, this goes to the sent folder, but qmail
> does not send the message, as i can see in the log: no entry for the sent
>
Myron,
So do you think they're just using MY e-mail address as their 'reply-to' for their
spam? Here's another piece of one, with a snippet & question below:
Received: from scanri1.uhc.com ([10.85.124.102])
by UHCNH006.UHC.COM (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12)
with ESMTP i
Hi, i've my server with qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail; it works fine, but within
sqwebmail if i send a new message, this goes to the sent folder, but qmail
does not send the message, as i can see in the log: no entry for the sent
message, no errors.
I've tryed to reinstall sqwebmail, but the problem pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I assume you're running qmail right? I say it's forged everything past the
(host-81-190-14-183.rzeszow.mm.pl [81.190.14.183]) mark. All the headers
after that point were generated by the 81.190.14.183 ip address. Because
you don't trust that machine
Am Do, den 09.09.2004 schrieb Matthew Walker um 19:42:
> QmailAdmin doesn't seem to handle Message Count quotas. At least, my
> version doesn't, and I'm pretty sure it's got everything turned on. ;)
Yup. That's why I'm asking.
> I did have one more question.
>
> Does vpopmail+mysql properly supp
On Thursday 09 September 2004 02:24 pm, Myron Davis wrote:
[snip 150k of quoted text and sigs]
Please folks, trim your messages when you reply. sending a giant email to
1000 people really kills our upstream :)
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies,
On Sep 8, 2004, at 8:43 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am Do, den 09.09.2004 schrieb Jeremy Kitchen um 0:50:
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 04:44 pm, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
please stop this madness. read the headers of every message sent to
you by
the mailing list to figure out how to
OK Myron,
I see what you're saying about these being forged... so the bottom-line is I can't do
ANYthing about it, right? I mean: I'm getting 100 postmaster error e-mails PER DAY
like these! All because spammers are forging their 'reply-to' addresses as 'ME', so I
get the error returns...
A
On Thursday 09 September 2004 05:17 pm, Fred Colclough wrote:
> OK Myron,
>
> I see what you're saying about these being forged... so the bottom-line is
> I can't do ANYthing about it, right? I mean: I'm getting 100 postmaster
> error e-mails PER DAY like these! All because spammers are forging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is one thing you can do, it won't help too much, but publish SPF
records. http://spf.pobox.com, then any mailer which understands spf
records will not accept mail from the false machine because your SPF
records did not grant them permission.
Yo
On Sep 9, 2004, at 10:42 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
QmailAdmin doesn't seem to handle Message Count quotas. At least, my
version doesn't, and I'm pretty sure it's got everything turned on. ;)
Correct. You might be able to enter 100S,1000C in the quota field
and have it processed correctly, but
Darn. Any chance of it being supported in the future, or has it just
been decided to let that be handled by OS quotas?
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:40:47 -0700, Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2004, at 10:42 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
> > QmailAdmin doesn't seem to handle Message Count
On Sep 9, 2004, at 5:50 PM, Matthew Walker wrote:
Darn. Any chance of it being supported in the future, or has it just
been decided to let that be handled by OS quotas?
If you really want it, and can't code it yourself, you'll have to wait
until someone else (who can code it) really wants it and h
On Thursday 09 September 2004 06:35 pm, Myron Davis wrote:
> There is one thing you can do, it won't help too much, but publish SPF
> records. http://spf.pobox.com, then any mailer which understands spf
> records will not accept mail from the false machine because your SPF
> records did not grant
32 matches
Mail list logo
