> If your only problem is the user count (lucky you) you can manualy reset
> the cur_users and it will begin wirking again.
Ok now you make me worried... What other things have you run in to because
that was my fear anyways: I don't understand why this doesn't work (well it
just seems unimplement
Hello All,
I've been trying to find a method to run qmail + smtpd-auth + vpopmail with support
for system
accounts without running any of it as root. Can anyone tell me if this is possible?
I believe it is impossible to have system account support without some part of the
system running
as root
I will be out of the office starting 08/06/2004 and will not return until
08/08/2004.
I will respond to your message when I return.
NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may
contain le
Hugh Beaumont wrote:
Hello All,
I've been trying to find a method to run qmail + smtpd-auth + vpopmail with support
for system
accounts without running any of it as root. Can anyone tell me if this is possible?
No. If any accounts are not owned by vpopmail:vchkpw it must be root so
it can change
Hi,
I known that this isn't the right place for what i'm looking for, but I hope
that someone can help me or redirect me to an howto.
I have a mail server with qmail and vpopmail installed
My mail account is insert in a lot of aliases so if someone send a mail to
two or tree of this I receve the
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:22:17 +0200, fmessere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My mail account is insert in a lot of aliases so if someone send a mail to
> two or tree of this I receve the same mail a lot of time. Is there a way to
> avoid this?
>
google eliminate-dups
--
Regards Manny
"Unix is sim
Hi,
I think i've posted here before about this, but i can't get
qmail-autoresponder to work. It sends the vacation message to the original
sender, alright, but it doesn't deliver the original messagem from him.
qmail-send, logs shows that the message coming from the sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is
I am thinking this is client based, but at a loss;
Have a server (qmail, vchkpw, sqwebmail, mysql...), has about 2500 email
accounts on it, roaming users enabled using POP before SMTP auth.
Tweaked the vmysql.c(vupdate_rules) and rebuilt vpopmail to add a skip
to RBL checks for all authed users.
Mark Richardson wrote:
If your only problem is the user count (lucky you) you can manualy reset
the cur_users and it will begin wirking again.
Ok now you make me worried... What other things have you run in to because
that was my fear anyways: I don't understand why this doesn't work (well it
jus
Japheth Cleaver wrote:
Hello all,
I've written a small poppassd service (port 106) that is usable with
vpopmail when using a MySQL back-end. I specifically wrote it to use
with the SquirrelMail "change password" plugin
(http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=21) when I had
problems gett
On Friday 06 August 2004 02:18 am, Hugh Beaumont wrote:
> qmail-pop3d runs as vpopmail - everything works except system account
> password checking
ls -l /etc/shadow
nuff said.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.i
--- Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 06 August 2004 02:18 am, Hugh Beaumont wrote:
> > qmail-pop3d runs as vpopmail - everything works except system account
> > password checking
>
> ls -l /etc/shadow
>
> nuff said.
>
> -Jeremy
>
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for the, um, help :)
O
--- Rick Widmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe it is impossible to have system account support without some part of the
> > system
> running
> > as root. Is this correct?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Do most people run qmail-pop3d + vpopmail as root? I used to do this but recently
> > switched
> o
On Friday 06 August 2004 11:26 am, Hugh Beaumont wrote:
> > > qmail-pop3d runs as vpopmail - everything works except system account
> > > password checking
> > ls -l /etc/shadow
> > nuff said.
> Thanks for the, um, help :)
more like a hint :)
> Obviously /etc/shadow is owned by root.root - this
--- Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand why you're so concerned with having the pop3 server run as
> root. qmail-popup has no remote root holes (at least stock, which is what
> most people use, as I don't think there are any patches out there that
> directly affect q
On Friday 06 August 2004 11:53 am, Hugh Beaumont wrote:
> --- Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't understand why you're so concerned with having the pop3 server
> > run as root. qmail-popup has no remote root holes (at least stock, which
> > is what most people use, as I don't th
16 matches
Mail list logo
