what is file rcpthosts and morercpthosts ? what is defferent ?
when i add new domain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# ~vpopmail/bin/vadddomain test1.com tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# ~vpopmail/bin/vadddomain test2.com tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# ~vpopmail/bin/vadddomain test3.com tom
[EMAIL PRO
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 20:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what is file rcpthosts and morercpthosts ? what is defferent ?
-
# man qmail-smtpd
Rule of thumb for large sites: Put your 50 most commonly used
domains into rcpthosts, and the rest into morercpthosts.
-
the rcpthos
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 01:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what is file rcpthosts and morercpthosts ? what is defferent ?
man qmail-control
find what is using both of them and read the manpage for that (hint:
qmail-smtpd)
morercpthosts needs to have qmail-newmrh run to rebuild the cdb file th
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
It is a simplified replacement for qscanq.
We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid.
Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri.
It is invoked via the QMAILQUEUE patch.
Differences:
- uses configure
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
If you are interested, please email me directly and I'll send you a tar ball.
Absolutely. I'd love to test it on our test mail machine. :)
Thanks in advance!
Chris Kalin
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
Yes, definitely interested!
pelase send for me.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for
clamav/spamassassin
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
It is a
Howdy,
I can't recall the original thread that went off on a tangent, but there
was some talk about whether or not the mysql C libs handled failover,
round-robin, etc.
I was curious myself, so I asked about this on the mysql list. Apparently
the libs don't do anything special; if you hit a db th
Okay, looking at the INSTALL file and the simscan.c file here are some
ideas:
* move bk_attachments array to /var/qmail/simscan/blockattachments (or
similiar external config file)
* make spam blocking at smtp level optional, add an option to inject in
the queue the output of spamc instead of t
Hi,
I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5.
But my users have talked about changing the webmail, mainly because
layout limitations
and other resources like virtual disk, support online for many
languages, instant messages
when new emails are received, etc.
I look a
Hi,
Try squirrelmail.
It has more features, a lot of plugins and it is easy to restyle.
But if features that you want, IMP is the answer. Take no substitutes. But
it's a pain in the ass to restyle.
Even better: tell your users that sqwebmail may be ugly, but it's by far the
most secure and reliab
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 03:59 pm, Edilmar wrote:
> I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5.
> But my users have talked about changing the webmail, mainly because
> layout limitations
> and other resources like virtual disk, support online for many
> languages, insta
tisdagen den 27 juli 2004 22.59 skrev Edilmar:
> Hi,
>
> I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5.
> But my users have talked about changing the webmail, mainly because
> layout limitations
> and other resources like virtual disk, support online for many
> languages,
try
http://www.uebimiau.org
- Original Message -
From: "Edilmar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:59 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
Hi,
I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5.
But my
Just to add chuck another item into the melting
pot... ;-)
> I look at SQuirelmail but it needs IMAP and I'd not
> like to install a new service.
Try http://ilohamail.org, has it's own integral
IMAP should you decide to try it. Works directly
with Qmail/ Vpopmail and the source is there for
y
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
try
http://www.uebimiau.org
Do not try it. I've being using it for two years and I'm now looking
for another webmail. Uebimiau is easy to install/configure, do not
depend on IMAP (it uses POP3) and brings Apache to 99% of CPU load when
(even if it's just a few) users
try http://hastymail.sourceforge.net/ i think better than uebimiau
- Original Message -
From: "Eduardo M. Bragatto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> > when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it return "sorry, that domain isn't
> > allowed relay"
>
> qmail never says that. if you're getting that error, then you've found
> your problem: qmail isn't being used for that domain.
>
> I just connected to your MX and tried to send a mail to [EMAIL PRO
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:57:20 -0500, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
Can you send it to me ? I will love to try it.
--
Regards Manny
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
- Dennis Ritchie
What I want to realize is that all incoming messages would be saved to
the appointed directory.
I performed the following operations in order to all incoming messages
are also save to /usr/local/vpopmail/domains/bar.com/foo/Maildir.bak,
but the original message is doubly written down in the saved
20 matches
Mail list logo
