Hi list,
I am running qmailmrtg 4.0 on a 64bit-Linux (Gentoo) and have been running
into the following situation:
qmailmrtg works, but graphs which have to be read out of logfiles (such as
msgs, local/remote concurrency) are not shown. Graphs which are processed
from other resources (CPU load
i installed qmail using lwq and configured the domain name as eriva.erivaind.com
then i created a virtual domain with vpopmail as erivaind.com
and added 2 users anu and puneet using qmailadmin.
i configured outlook express in one of the client pcs.
with pop and smtp servers as 192.168.1.9(the i
Hi there.
I am trying to set an email server. I installed qmail with urpmi, and want to
install qmailadmin. I know the requirements and could install autorespond and
ezmlm. But I am having difficulties installing the vpopmail. Here is what I wrote
to konsole:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] vpopmail-5.4.5]# gr
Dear Anu,
Try to send mail using these email ids through Webmail.
send the result.
Manish Jain
(Network Administrator)
C-DAC (Ministry of Comm. & IT)
"Anusandhan Bhawan"
C-56/1, Sec-62, Noida - 201307
Ph91 120 2402563 (Direct)
91 120 2402551-60 (Ext-718)
FAX 91 120 2402569
- Origi
On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Kaan Ertürk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] vpopmail-5.4.5]# make
cd . && \
/bin/sh /home/vpopmail-5.4.5/missing --run automake --foreign
Makefile
configure.in: 89: required file `./_AM_File,.in' not found
configure.in: 89: required file `./[$2],.in' not found
configure.in
I'm not exactly sure which list to bounce this request off of but I'll start
here. If this would be better on a different list, please let me know.
ok... Server farm setup is
srv01 - mysql-master database.
srv02, srv03 and srv04 are machines with identical installation of
qmail/mysql/vpopmai
On Jun 29, 2004, at 3:58 AM, Anuradha Kalyan wrote:
when i tried telnet to the local host as follows, i get the following
message.
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet 192.168.1.9 25
Trying 192.168.1.9...
Connected to 192.168.1.9.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 eriva.erivaind.com ESMTP
user [
David Brinks wrote:
I'm not exactly sure which list to bounce this request off of but I'll start
here. If this would be better on a different list, please let me know.
ok... Server farm setup is
srv01 - mysql-master database.
srv02, srv03 and srv04 are machines with identical installation of
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:34:30 +0700
François Wautier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patch applies does not solve the underlying problem, the fact that you
> cannot connect to the DB server. It just makes sure the system behaves > properly
> even when one cannot access the DB.
I see. Y
David Brinks wrote:
Rick, I understand that 5.4.5 fixed some things in
mysql code but with the system that is currently in
place, why would it work for months then all of a
sudden out of the blue just stop working ???
-- David.
Hi,
Increased volume maybe ? I believe the symptoms you described occu
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 11:01 am, Tom Collins wrote:
> Does LWQ include SMTP AUTH patches to qmail-smtpd? Stock qmail doesn't
> include that feature.
no, it uses netqmail-1.05
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.in
David Brinks wrote:
I'm not exactly sure which list to bounce this request off of but I'll start
here. If this would be better on a different list, please let me know.
This was just fixed in the latest version of vpopmail...
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/
Don't forget to recompile e
I am looking around for a suitable (ie, reasonably priced and performance)
NAS unit in order to convert a bunch of standalone servers into a cluster.
SATA RAID units seem to be what I am looking for.
I would appreciate those out there who have experience using NAS boxes for
this purpose to share y
We use netapps (www.netapp.com) and it works great. One of the big things
that made me move towards the netapp in place of many of the other NAS units
out there was the fact that it runs a nix based OS. Most of the ones, say..
Dell for example just run a stripped down version of windows with file
>> I am looking around for a suitable (ie, reasonably priced and
>> performance)
>> NAS unit in order to convert a bunch of standalone servers
>> into a cluster.
>> SATA RAID units seem to be what I am looking for.
>>
>> I would appreciate those out there who have experience using
>> NAS boxes
I'm setting up a new server with vpopmail 5.4.4 (should be the latest
stable?), and everything was working as it should until I got to the
point of load testing. I added 10,000 accounts (not quite as many as I
have on the production server, which runs vpopmail 5.2.1) to test.com on
the server with
On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
However, when I then send a mail to any user (doesn't matter which)
qmail-local kicks off the delivery process and it takes a LONG time and
there is LOTS of disk access. By using the lsof command i was able to
see what files vdelivermail had open, and
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 19:06, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
> > However, when I then send a mail to any user (doesn't matter which)
> > qmail-local kicks off the delivery process and it takes a LONG time and
> > there is LOTS of disk access. By using the lsof c
On Jun 29, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
I will try this, but could you elaborate on why that is/would cause
this? Is this 'by design' for a setup with domain limits turned on?
It's a poor design that requires vdelivermail to traverse the entire
domain to determine whether it's over quota o
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 19:20, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
> > I will try this, but could you elaborate on why that is/would cause
> > this? Is this 'by design' for a setup with domain limits turned on?
>
> It's a poor design that requires vdelivermail to tra
Hi,
> I see. You said, in your previous message:
> "The code in vpopmail was first trying to connect to the server for a given
> database. If that was failing, it would try the server only and if that
> succeeded, it was considering that the server was fine but that the DB was
> not created."
>
>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:29:55PM -0700, Clayton Weise wrote:
> We use netapps (www.netapp.com) and it works great. One of the big
> things that made me move towards the netapp in place of many of the
> other NAS units out there was the fact that it runs a nix based OS.
> Most of the ones, say..
--- Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Kaan Ertürk wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] vpopmail-5.4.5]# make
> > cd . && \
> > /bin/sh /home/vpopmail-5.4.5/missing --run automake --foreign
> > Makefile
> > configure.in: 89: required file `./_AM_File,.in' not found
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
