Can help me anybody please?
i think the problem is the way to launch the smtp
server.
I start the smtp daemon of this way
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H
-R -x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c20 -u 87 -g 89 0 smtp
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
i need your help becouse I tried to solve
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:17:53 -0700
Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://vpopmail.sf.net
>
> Release Notes:
>
> There are significant changes in here for MySQL and Postgres backends.
>
> If you've had errors stating "couldn't create table/database because it
> already exists" with MyS
Hi,
Since I submitted that patch.. I guess I should answer.
The code in vpopmail was first trying to connect to the server for a given
database. If that was failing, it would try the server only and if that
succeeded, it was considering that the server was fine but that the DB was
not created.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:54:55 +0700
François Wautier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I submitted that patch.. I guess I should answer.
>
> The code in vpopmail was first trying to connect to the server for a given
> database. If that was failing, it would try the server only and if th
# Originally posted in the courier forum by mistake
Why isn't the Maildir being picked up?
Here's the log for courier-imap. TAI snipped to hopefully prevent
word-wrap:
tcpserver: pid 1469 from 10.0.2.112
tcpserver: ok 1469 0:10.0.2.155:143 :10.0.2.112::51279
DEBUG: Connection, ip=[10.0.2.112]
LO
Hello,
We are having a very strange problem with our qmail + vpopmail
installation; I'm hoping someone on this list can enlighten me as to
the problem.
First of all, this is a production system which has been happily
working for over a year. Authed POP users of arbitrary domains are
added to open
Hey folks:
Looks like spam is being relayed through my big server. Not sure how
they're doing it; I'm using SMTP-AUTH (0.4.2) & it seems to work
properly. Any clues would be appreciated & I'm happy to show whatever
files people want to see, but for now I'm going on the assumption
that someone h
On Monday 28 June 2004 02:13 pm, Kit Halsted wrote:
> Hey folks:
>
> Looks like spam is being relayed through my big server. Not sure how
> they're doing it; I'm using SMTP-AUTH (0.4.2) & it seems to work
> properly. Any clues would be appreciated & I'm happy to show whatever
> files people want to
At 2:21 PM -0500 6/28/04, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 28 June 2004 02:13 pm, Kit Halsted wrote:
Hey folks:
Looks like spam is being relayed through my big server. Not sure how
they're doing it; I'm using SMTP-AUTH (0.4.2) & it seems to work
properly. Any clues would be appreciated & I'm hap
On Monday 28 June 2004 02:40 pm, Kit Halsted wrote:
> >if the server in question is the MX for kithalsted.com, it appears to be
> > fine,
>
> It's the secondary for that domain, actually.
ok.
> Received: from unknown (HELO exhausted) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ echo -n "webmaster"
Thanks so much, Jeremy!
At 3:17 PM -0500 6/28/04, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 28 June 2004 02:40 pm, Kit Halsted wrote:
>if the server in question is the MX for kithalsted.com, it appears to be
> fine,
It's the secondary for that domain, actually.
ok.
Received: from unknown (HELO exhausted)
Hi,
The patch applies does not solve the underlying problem, the fact that you
cannot connect to the DB server. It just makes sure the system behaves
properly even when one cannot access the DB.
In the case of email delivery, proper behaviour means that the message is put
back into the queue f
12 matches
Mail list logo
