do you think it has something todo with the fact that its not in the
standard directory /home/vpopmail...on this machine it defaults to
/var/qmail/vpopmail ?
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 18:12, Ken Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 May 2004 04:51 pm, Mark Matrafajlo wrote:
> > when i look in the vpopmail/inc
I have
netqmail 1.05 with vpopmail 5.4.0
I have set
the defaultdomain file as such:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
root]# cd /home/vpopmail/etc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc]# cat defaultdomain
uptel.local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc]#
and yet I am
still unable to login via any pop3 client without the %up
Do i need the authvchkpwd enabled on the courier ./configure to work
with vpopmail and mysql
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 09:14, Mark Matrafajlo wrote:
> do you think it has something todo with the fact that its not in the
> standard directory /home/vpopmail...on this machine it defaults to
> /var/qmail/
did you try already?
Mark Matrafajlo wrote:
Do i need the authvchkpwd enabled on the courier ./configure to work
with vpopmail and mysql
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 09:14, Mark Matrafajlo wrote:
do you think it has something todo with the fact that its not in the
standard directory /ho
I think I saw a qmail patch that let you use a badrcptto or badmailto
file in /var/qmail/controls. Check http://www.qmail.org and search for
badrcptto (there are two of them right together). If this works, it
would reject the mail at the smtp level.
If you're dead set on using vpopmail functiona
yes still doesn't compilei'm at a loss
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 13:11, Patrick Donker wrote:
> did you try already?
>
> Mark Matrafajlo wrote:
> > Do i need the authvchkpwd enabled on the courier ./configure to work
> > with vpopmail and mysql
> >
> > On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 09:14, Mark Matrafajlo
I have inherited a qmail installation, and we now have a fair amount of
(customer-visible) infrastructure that appears to depend on qmail.
Thus, when the decision was made that we needed to be able to
support customer-managed mailing lists, I poked around a bit and found
that (apparently) ezmlm is
> Complicating things (apparently) is that our mail server is
> separate from the Web server on which we provide clients'
> virtual hosts: I am hoping to be able to allow a customer to
> create (say) "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (but ezmlm-web appears to
> want to use the canonical hostname for the mai
Alle 22:39, giovedì 20 maggio 2004, David Wolfskill ha scritto:
> Is there some other choice I might plausibly make to support such
> lists?
If I'd be you, I'd install an apache-ssl on the mail server with access
only to ezweb (ezmlm-idx manager, I find it nice, but I didn't ever try
to sell it
>
> I think I saw a qmail patch that let you use a badrcptto or
> badmailto file in /var/qmail/controls. Check
> http://www.qmail.org and search for badrcptto (there are two
> of them right together). If this works, it would reject the
> mail at the smtp level.
Thanks for the info.
> I th
Cesare D'Amico wrote:
Alle 22:39, giovedì 20 maggio 2004, David Wolfskill ha scritto:
Is there some other choice I might plausibly make to support such
lists?
If I'd be you, I'd install an apache-ssl on the mail server with access
only to ezweb (ezmlm-idx manager, I fin
I am using vpopmail, courier imap, and qmail. I am a bit overwhealmed
on which SMTP auth patch to use. I want it so that when a user checks
their imap e-mail it enters their IP into a table for SMTP auth. Where
do i proceed to go to get this to work properly?
Thanks,
Brooks
Why no check out Matt Simersons site for the FreeBSD Toaster.
http://www.tnpi.biz
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Bellears [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] User-managed mailing lists in virtual
> hos
Michael Bellears wrote:
Complicating things (apparently) is that our mail server is
separate from the Web server on which we provide clients'
virtual hosts:
That doesn't complicate things, it simplifies them. I do not want
clients updating web files on my mail server. You will want an instan
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:26:14PM -0700, Chris Odell wrote:
>
> Why no check out Matt Simersons site for the FreeBSD Toaster.
>http://www.tnpi.biz
I may check that out at some point; for now, the earlier suggestion of
qmailadmin appears to be working. I'll need to wait 'til my boss is
back to
Mark Matrafajlo wrote:
do you think it has something todo with the fact that its not in the
standard directory /home/vpopmail...on this machine it defaults to
/var/qmail/vpopmail ?
As long as the home directory is set before you run ./configure it works
just fine in any directory.
Are you aware tha
I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with
this patch:
qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -
The only problem with qmailadmin is that it does not have enough features
and you have to do a bunch of manual configuration to run a large mailing
list.
Big things that are missing/get overwritten with any update are the welcome
messages and help revert back to default a way to black list poste
On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:00 pm, blist wrote:
> I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with
> this patch:
>qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from
> http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
>
> Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
>
> exec /usr/local/bi
Jeremy,
QMAILDUID = vpopmail
I know if i take out the domain its open :(.. That is the only thing so
far that works.. I am at loss what I did wrong. Been googling all night :)
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:00 pm, blist wrote:
I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I
The patch you are using is incredibly old.
You should consider auth-jms1.4a.patch from
http://www.jms1.net/qmail/auth-jms1.4a.patch
If that link is broken, google on "auth-jms1.4a.patch" and look at the
cached version.
You might also consider the qmail-requireauth.patch that allows you to
set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:00 pm, blist wrote:
>>Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
>>
>>exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1000 \
>>/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l "$LOCAL" -x \
>>/usr/local/vpopmail/etc/tc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies, the solution i provided *WILL* not work. Considering the
code still contains the hostname stuff.
What i suggest is you grab the patch from the vpopmail contrib
directory, it contains a copy that *will* work.
X-Istence
-BEGIN PGP SI
So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT the
hostname in the run script for tcpserver?
Wont this make the server an open relay?
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies, the solution i provided *WILL* not work. Considering the
code still cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT the
> hostname in the run script for tcpserver?
>
> Wont this make the server an open relay?
No, cause that patch doesnt require a hostname on purpose, as to many
poeple
I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the same
senario.
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
> it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the
> same senario.
What does your data.cdb or smtp.cdb look like that gets created from a file
I do not have an open relay. I am trying to setup SMTP Auth. It is not
working.. When users try to auth, it just keeps asking for username
password over and over. Never sends.
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
I have put in the patch as descri
28 matches
Mail list logo
