Hi,
I've installed vpopmail, but i'm having problems with adding domains.
The first one i add works just fine.
>From the second one on i get this error:
"Signal 1 caught by ps (procps version 2.0.13).
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
I've compiled vpopmail with --enable-many-domai
Pls include your bug report
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I've installed vpopmail, but i'm having problems with adding domains.
The first one i add works just fine.
From the second one on i get this error:
"Signal 1 caught by ps (procps version 2.0.13).
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
I'v
Sorry, but i don't understand your issue.
Would you care to explain it more specifically, please ?
Warm Regards,
Mário Gamito
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Donker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Probl
Mário Gamito wrote:
Sorry, but i don't understand your issue.
Would you care to explain it more specifically, please ?
Warm Regards,
Mário Gamito
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Donker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, i can't find any bug report
anywhere.
I've searched all possible files.
Any ideas ?
Warm regards,
Mário Gamito
From: Patrick Donker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 12:42
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Problems
with multi domains in
Mário Gamito wrote:
Sorry, i can't find any bug
report anywhere.
I've searched all possible files.
Any ideas ?
Warm regards,
Mário Gamito
From:
Patrick Donker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mário Gamito wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed vpopmail, but i'm having problems with adding domains.
> The first one i add works just fine.
>
> From the second one on i get this error:
> "Signal 1 caught by ps (procps version 2.0.13).
> Please send bug
Hi list
Our admin set up a new mailserver which should provide IMAP to our
coworkers - problem: their current (local) mailboxes are already
scratching the 2GB limit of their mailclients, therefore we needed
higher quotas on the new server to suit the coworkers needs. When
testing his qmail+vpopmail
Hi,
I've compiled vpopmail witg no compiler flags and with configured options:
"./configure -without-ipv6 -enable-unicode
-enable-workarounds-for-imap-client-bugs -without-authpwd -without-authpam
-without-authuserdb -without-authcram -with-authvchkpw -without-authldap
-without-authmysql -without-
Michael Kefeder wrote:
Our admin set up a new mailserver which should provide IMAP to our
coworkers - problem: their current (local) mailboxes are already
scratching the 2GB limit of their mailclients, therefore we needed
higher quotas on the new server to suit the coworkers needs. When
testing his
On May 16, 2004, at 9:08 AM, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote:
Michael Kefeder wrote:
Our admin set up a new mailserver which should provide IMAP to our
coworkers - problem: their current (local) mailboxes are already
scratching the 2GB limit of their mailclients, therefore we needed
higher quotas on the
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I've compiled vpopmail witg no compiler flags and with configured options:
"./configure -without-ipv6 -enable-unicode
-enable-workarounds-for-imap-client-bugs -without-authpwd -without-authpam
-without-authuserdb -without-authcram -with-authvchkpw -without-authldap
-without-
Hi,
I have -with-authvchkpw
I know it's for user's accounts-
What is missing then ?
Thank you for your answer.
Warm Regards,
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Donker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 5:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Pr
Regardless, it's still a good idea to properly support sizes >2GB.
Michael, perhaps you could take a look at the latest 5.4 version and
send me a patch against that?
Yes i can, but looking at the new code (5.4.3) there are some new
features i don't know about yet (per domain quotas i guess) w
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi,
I have -with-authvchkpw
I know it's for user's accounts-
What is missing then ?
Thank you for your answer.
Warm Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Donker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Friday 14 May 2004 9:40 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
> On May 14, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Ewan Bain wrote:
> > I'm trying to use valias to setup a catch-all address. I've tried
> > several
> > different ways and the mail always bounces. Is it possible to setup a
> > catch-all with valias? Is so how?
>
> Th
Ewan Bain wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 9:40 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
On May 14, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Ewan Bain wrote:
I'm trying to use valias to setup a catch-all address. I've tried
several
different ways and the mail always bounces. Is it possible to setup a
catch-all with valias? Is so how?
The ca
On May 16, 2004, at 4:22 PM, Ewan Bain wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 9:40 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
On May 14, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Ewan Bain wrote:
I'm trying to use valias to setup a catch-all address. I've tried
several
different ways and the mail always bounces. Is it possible to setup a
catch-all wi
Is there a vpopmail mechanism to only permit SMTP connections inbound for
those IPs that appear in the current relays table? I realize that this
means that SMTPd probably needs to talk to the MYSQL db with the relay
table (my implementation), but I'm curious if this is doable. VPOPMAIL
5.2.1, RH
19 matches
Mail list logo
