> Here is what I've come up with so far for the vpopmaild daemon.
> Comments?
One more. Prototypes you sent don't include options to vaddusers etc.
Options should be passed along in this protocol so that we could use for
example vaddduser -n :-)
Solt
vpopmaild Monday status and summary
1) Status
I have a working vpopmaild that authenticates and runs
a few of the commands below. I'll be working on more
of the functions today. I'll update CVS later today so
people can pick up a working copy.
1) The auth command.
Let's have it return the user
Hi folks,
I am using Vpopmail 5.3.30 and I recently upgraded to redhat 9.0 and
vpopmail is giving the error: "Incorrectly built binary which accesses
errno or h_errno directly. Needs to be fixed.". So, I've re-configured
and re-compiled the vpopmail, but the problem remains. The I decided to
downl
Hi all,
where can i find vpopmaild?
Am Mo, den 05.04.2004 schrieb Ken Jones um 16:16:
> vpopmaild Monday status and summary
>
> 1) Status
> I have a working vpopmaild that authenticates and runs
> a few of the commands below. I'll be working on more
> of the functions today. I'll update CVS late
Hi,
I followed this http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm howto
to configure qmail + vpopmail + mysql
but i get the following error when
i try to add a domain:
Failure while attempting to remove_line() the
locals fileError. Failed to add domain to assign file
Wh
Are you running the vpopmail commands as
root?
If this is not the problem, then a bit more information
would be helpful, such as version of vpopmail your using, platform your running
on, log info etc.
Shane
From: Thiago M. Campos
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 6 Apri
(Apologies for the delayed reply - I've been on the road)
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 13:52, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> > Even if RELAYCLIENT is set, (the Auth patched) qmail-smtpd *WILL* ask for
> > Authentication.
>
> No. It'll /OFFER/ SMTP-ATUH, for those that want to set up their mail
> client to
Yes. I'm running this command as root.
I'm using:
RH 8
vpopmail-5.4.3
qmail-103
mysql-max-3.23.58-pc-linux-i686
Witch log would be helpful?
Thanks
Thiago
- Original Message -
From:
Shane
Chrisp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 1:11
PM
Subject
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:14:26PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>Thanks for your help, which lead to the resolution. Still a mystery to me
>why a default SMTP answerer would respond with 5.7.1. I inquired about that
>but got no reply yet.
Just a wild guess, but perhaps because the recipient address
Never used remote logging for multilog so I can't tell you about that, but
it looks pretty straight forward. NFS settings can be tweaked to improve
its performance/bandwidth usage. I've only seen it chew up a ton of
bandwidth when things aren't setup properly, or when a drive couldn't be
mounted
Joel Newkirk schrieb:
- I want both method, SMTP-Auth and POP3-b4-SMTP, for allowing a client
to relay.
- I don't want the system to /require/ SMTP-Auth when POP3-b4-SMTP
already set RELAYCLIENT=""
Hi,
I have such a setup.
I use qmail-spamcontrol+vpopmail+mysql+courier+relay-ctrl
my smtpd run
Hi all,
I use vpopmail with procmail and i have a rule if the user passed your quota,
i return with bouncesaying, but the message error is not returned by qmail.
My .procmailrc is:
:0fhw
* ^From:
| formail -I "X-Quota: $QUOTA"
:0
* ^X-Quota: noquota
{
EXITCODE=100
:0w
* ^X-Quota: noquota
|/var
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 13:20, Shane Chrisp wrote:
> PS: I just confirmed the format is as I said before. Add the IP address
> like 192.168.0 with a NULL timestamp.
>
> Shane
Well, I've tried this, but it always disappears from the DB eventually,
I presume (unchecked) when clearopensmtp runs. I'v
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
> Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
> before it gets posted? It could use another
> set of eyes.
Show me the money :-)
Solt
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes please.
Regards,
Rick
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Yes, please.
Rick
>
> Never used remote logging for multilog so I can't tell you
> about that, but it looks pretty straight forward. NFS
> settings can be tweaked to improve its performance/bandwidth
> usage. I've only seen it chew up a ton of bandwidth when
> things aren't setup properly, or when a drive cou
[snip]
> same time, and what are the chances of that... The other
> option though, is that vpopmail does support a master/slave
> setup where any writable queries go to server X while
> readable ones are done locally for performance. This is a
> better scenario than two way replication since
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here ya go.
> Look at README.vpopmaild
>
> Short test procedure:
> ./configure (your options)
> make
> ./vpopmaild
> login [EMAIL PROTECTED] user
> help
./configure with option PASSED
make PASSED
./vpopmaild
./vpopmaild
+OK
log
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
>[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I think it works pretty nicely. A single "." on a line by itself
represents End of File when sending or receiving multiple
lines of infomation.
From the cli
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 4:05 pm, you wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Got it! It compiled and ran the first time. Good job Ken!
Am I correct that any user can be a System admin, if given SA
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
[snip]
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
I like it very much so far!
The way you put the user name and password on the same transaction is
even better than following pop3 exact
On Monday 05 April 2004 7:36 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 05 April 2004 2:46 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >
> > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > is using a POP3 type protocol.
>
> I like it very much so far!
>
> The way you put the user name and
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be some people running the clie
Hi,
Ken Jones wrote:
So the mod_user function would take it's
options on additional lines, like:
moduser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no_smtp
quota 1234
.
And the server would reply back
+OK
or
-ERR XXX error message
I get this
list_dir /home/vpopmail/domains/nougen.com/naomi/Maildir/cur
+OK
.
On a user w
On Monday 05 April 2004 8:08 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
> > is using a POP3 type protocol.
>
> Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
>
> One little question... What are you thinking of as far as
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like any comments or votes on how this version
is using a POP3 type protocol.
Sounds good to me, this is getting exciting!
One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
I'm sure there's going to be som
Rick Macdougall wrote:
I'm of the thought that it should be
line of text
line of text
+OK
Or even skip the . and just finish with +OK #more text available here
That way every single response ends in +OK or -ERR
+1.
Note, I removed the . in the response list. It will be easier to just
look f
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > One little question... What are you thinking of as far as encryption?
> > I'm sure there's going to be some people running the client on a box
> > seperate from the server. You looking at adding ssl support, or are you
> > thinking of just letting somethi
Ken Jones wrote:
Any votes on which way of specifying directories would be easier
from the client program's point of view?
a) full paths
b) relative based on user or command
As long as you tell me where ~vpopmail is when I login, always using
fully qualified paths will be easiest, I think. That
I see you have different error messages during login for:
invalid email address
user does not exist
invalid password
It might be better to return the same message for all so the hostile
hacker can't learn as much about your users.
Rick
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone want a test copy of vpopmaild
before it gets posted? It could use another
set of eyes.
Ken
Sure, shoot me a copy this way :)
X-Istence
When I login, the following information is returned:
vpopmail_dir /mail
uid 77
gid 72
name postmaster
comment Postmaster
quota NOQUOTA
dir /mail/domains/test.com/postmaster
encrypted_password $1$zkJe.3SH$7HOl1RbwfKcibL67iXjsh/
clear_text_password password
domain_admin
Do I have any better way to obtain information on the catchall status
than reading .qmail-default myself?
Do I need one?
The status report, about line 1077, in function list_users is missing
the '+'.
On Monday 05 April 2004 11:09 pm, Rick Widmer wrote:
> When I login, the following information is returned:
>
> vpopmail_dir /mail
> uid 77
> gid 72
> name postmaster
> comment Postmaster
> quota NOQUOTA
> dir /mail/domains/test.com/postmaster
> encrypted_password $1
37 matches
Mail list logo
