Re: [vchkpw] Re: Not Virtual

2004-03-30 Thread Eirik Haavik
- Original Message - From: "Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:04 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Not Virtual > From: "Eirik Haavik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I am really not sure of that. Gary, > > Anyway i emtyed the locals file and restar

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Not Virtual

2004-03-30 Thread Gary
From: "Eirik Haavik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /var/qmail/control/locals > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# > > As you can see my locals file is emty now, but it still did not fix det > problem. > > My server still tryes to deliver all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if i send a > mail to

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Not Virtual

2004-03-30 Thread Eirik Haavik
- Original Message - From: "Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Not Virtual > From: "Eirik Haavik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /var/qmail/control/locals > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# >

[vchkpw] Blackholing a sender

2004-03-30 Thread Devendra Singh
Hi List Members, I have a peculiar requirement of just trashing a particular "Mail From:" to any of the virtual domains hosted on a Server. In that case even I do not want to bounce the mail just trash (/dev/null) it. Any pointers, please !!

[vchkpw] SMTP AUTH with vchkpw

2004-03-30 Thread signo
hello, i've problems with smtp-auth, when i try to send email from a client the server ask always for a password (but the passwd is ok) please help me!! thanks signo situation: qmail: qmail-1.03 vpopmail: 5.3.28 smtp-auth patch on qmail: qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/au

[vchkpw] OT: Hardware Experiences for a qmail + vpopmail install

2004-03-30 Thread Shane Chrisp
Hi, I know this is a little off topic, but still sort of related. Im putting together spec's for a new replacement server to host our qmail/vpopmail install and im thinking of using something similar to below. I was just interested in others oppinions/feedback in that someone may have had good or

Re: [vchkpw] OT: Hardware Experiences for a qmail + vpopmail install

2004-03-30 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, Shane Chrisp wrote: Hi, I know this is a little off topic, but still sort of related. Im putting together spec's for a new replacement server to host our qmail/vpopmail install and im thinking of using something similar to below. I was just interested in others oppinions/feedback in that som

[vchkpw] Re: Blackholing a sender

2004-03-30 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Devendra, On Tuesday, March 30, 2004 at 4:07:31 PM you wrote (at least in part): > I have a peculiar requirement of just trashing a particular "Mail From:" to > any of the virtual domains hosted on a Server. echo SENDERADDRESS >>/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom > In that case even I do not

[vchkpw] MySQL questions, vchkpw & tcpserver

2004-03-30 Thread Joel Newkirk
I've got a couple of issues. I'm in the process of migrating a cluster of qmail servers to MySQL backend for authentication, and have a question: I'm set up to use vpopmail:relay table to track pops, and I've applied the tcpserver patch to also use vpopmail:relay to store info on 'always-allowed'

[vchkpw] SMTP-Auth question

2004-03-30 Thread Joel Newkirk
Is there any way to set up SMTP-Auth, while still allowing pop-b4-smtp? So far when I've rebuilt the system with SMTP-Auth patching, it will ONLY accept SMTP-Auth to allow relaying... :( We have several thousand clients set up on pop-b4-smtp, and forcing a mass migration to smtp-auth is out of th

RE: [vchkpw] MySQL questions, vchkpw & tcpserver

2004-03-30 Thread Shane Chrisp
Im not certain, but I think you can add the IP like 192.168.0 with a NULL timestamp with version 2 of the tcpserver patch. Shane >-Original Message- >From: Joel Newkirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 11:41 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [vchkpw] MySQL quest

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw won't authorize non-virtual users

2004-03-30 Thread Rob Yale
Hi, I first compiled with -enable-roaming-users=y, but then re-compiled with no options. None of the docs I consulted referred to the -enable-passwd option (is that a double hyphen in the compile options?). Rob On Mar 30, 2004, at 2:16 AM, Gary wrote: From: "Rob Yale" Hi, I just finished i

Re: [vchkpw] MySQL questions, vchkpw & tcpserver

2004-03-30 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 03:40 pm, Joel Newkirk wrote: > I'm set up to use vpopmail:relay table to track pops, and I've applied > the tcpserver patch to also use vpopmail:relay to store info on > 'always-allowed' relaying from our own IPs. ugh. this is better: http://untroubled.org/relay-ctrl p

RE: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH with vchkpw

2004-03-30 Thread David Petruzzella
A1: The one I downloaded from here, it doesn't have a version on it. Wget http://archives.servercove.com/qmail/qmail-smtpd.c A2: Here is a copy of my smtpd run file: #!/bin/sh QMAILDUID=85 NOFILESGID=85 exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver \ -H -l yourhost.yourdoma

RE: [vchkpw] MySQL questions, vchkpw & tcpserver

2004-03-30 Thread Shane Chrisp
The mysql server patch for tcpserver works very well and its simple to use. That's aside from the fact that almost every qmail install out there is using tcpserver anyway. Makes sense to keep it simple. But each to their own, I personally would rather keep all the IP's that are allowed to relay in

[vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.0 + spamassassin

2004-03-30 Thread Phisher1
Im trying to achieve this: Vpopmail 5.4.0 with SpamAssassin 2.6.3 with auto-created .spamassassin dirs and the user_prefs file copied over. I have the patch on SpamAssassin 2.6.3 to do the auto creation. I am currently calling spamc from .qmail-default with the line: | spamc -f -u [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.0 + spamassassin

2004-03-30 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 12:39 pm, Phisher1 wrote: > Im trying to achieve this: > > Vpopmail 5.4.0 with SpamAssassin 2.6.3 with auto-created .spamassassin > dirs and the user_prefs file copied over. > > I have the patch on SpamAssassin 2.6.3 to do the auto creation. > > I am currently calling spamc

[vchkpw] Can ALL domains be virtual

2004-03-30 Thread Rob Yale
Ok, Since I'm having no success getting vchkpw to authorize non-virtual users, could I simply make all my domains virtual? I'd prefer to figure out why vchkpw won't quthorize correctly, but is this a viable solution? Thanks, Rob Yale Yale Music Composition and Production

Re: [vchkpw] Can ALL domains be virtual

2004-03-30 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 01:34 pm, Rob Yale wrote: > Ok, > > Since I'm having no success getting vchkpw to authorize non-virtual > users, could I simply make all my domains virtual? I'd prefer to > figure out why vchkpw won't quthorize correctly, but is this a viable > solution? Making all domain

[vchkpw] mbox to maildir

2004-03-30 Thread Chris Miller
Not sure if this is the right place to post this or not. If it’s not, feel free to slap me.\   I have several mailboxes in the mbox format (traditional one file in /var/spool/mail/username). I need to convert these to maildir format. I’ve seen the maildir2mbox, but that’s going the wrong

Re: [vchkpw] mbox to maildir

2004-03-30 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 08:20 pm, Chris Miller wrote: > Not sure if this is the right place to post this or not. If it's not, feel > free to slap me.\ *slap* > I have several mailboxes in the mbox format (traditional one file in > /var/spool/mail/username). I need to convert these to maildir for

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.0 + spamassassin

2004-03-30 Thread Phisher1
Ken Jones wrote: On Tuesday 30 March 2004 12:39 pm, Phisher1 wrote: Im trying to achieve this: Vpopmail 5.4.0 with SpamAssassin 2.6.3 with auto-created .spamassassin dirs and the user_prefs file copied over. I have the patch on SpamAssassin 2.6.3 to do the auto creation. I am currently callin

RE: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.0 + spamassassin

2004-03-30 Thread Phisher1
Never mind. /usr/share/spamassassin/user_prefs.template -Original Message- From: Phisher1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.0 + spamassassin Ken Jones wrote: >On Tuesday 30 March 2004 12:39 pm, Phish

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Blackholing a sender

2004-03-30 Thread Devendra Singh
At 30/03/04 20:39 (), you wrote: Hello Devendra, On Tuesday, March 30, 2004 at 4:07:31 PM you wrote (at least in part): > I have a peculiar requirement of just trashing a particular "Mail From:" to > any of the virtual domains hosted on a Server. echo SENDERADDRESS >>/var/qmail/control/badmailfr

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Blackholing a sender

2004-03-30 Thread John Johnson
I bet if you look at the tcprules help file there might be something to help. Check out http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcprules.html -John - Original Message - From: "Devendra Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: B

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH with vchkpw

2004-03-30 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi, At 16:12 30.03.04 +0200, signo wrote: >hello, i've problems with smtp-auth, when i try to send email from a >client the server ask always for a password (but the passwd is ok) > >please help me!! > >thanks > >signo > >situation: > >qmail: qmail-1.03 >vpopmail: 5.3.28 >smtp-auth patch on qmail

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-Auth question

2004-03-30 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi, At 10:48 30.03.04 -0500, Joel Newkirk wrote: >Is there any way to set up SMTP-Auth, while still allowing pop-b4-smtp? Yes. >So far when I've rebuilt the system with SMTP-Auth patching, it will >ONLY accept SMTP-Auth to allow relaying... :( You have to write a wrapper script around qmail-sm