On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote:
> > I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ?
> > Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for
> > scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
>
> I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 16:02, Alastair Battrick wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can someone explain why vpopmail won't let me have "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as a valid
> email address.
the official reason that I know of from previous list posts is because
of how vpopmail hashes the user directories after X number of us
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 17:37, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2004, at 4:11 PM, Stian Hole wrote:
> > I get the following error when trying to compile vpopmail:
> >
> > In file included from vconvert.c:35:
> > vmysql.h:53:22: missing terminating " character
> > vmysql.h:60:35: missing terminating "
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:45, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Or, try to apply the check user patch to the smtp server so the
> > email never makes it into your queue.
>
> Would it be possible to make a domain that uses this technique but forward all
> mail to another server, as a gateway?
checkuser pat
Correct me if I am wrong:
If you do this in a .qmail: (one line, no line break)
| script1.pl | script2.pl
(here the result piped into script2.pl depends on the output of script1.pl)
That's different from: (two lines, one line break)
| script1.pl
| script2.pl
(here both deliver independent resul
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 23:02, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> checkuser patch uses vpopmail calls. the domain would have to be in
> vpopmail on the other server and/or would require some more advanced
> configuration.
I ran into another problem. My mx server, which really shouldn't have
email addresses
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 01:25, Andy BIERLAIR wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong:
>
> If you do this in a .qmail: (one line, no line break)
>
> | script1.pl | script2.pl
> (here the result piped into script2.pl depends on the output of script1.pl)
yes
> That's different from: (two lines, one line b
please don't include me in the receipient list of messages posted to the
list. I already get a copy, I do not need multiple copies, thank you.
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 01:45, Tom Jackson wrote:
> I ran into another problem. My mx server, which really shouldn't have
> email addresses is listed in def
Hi there,
we use qmail and some of our customers have problems with attachments.
Outlook shows the message in the outgoing-folder, but has sent the
messages (5 mb) at least 2 times. Could it be a problem with
Open-Relays? What else can be done?
Greets
Björn
> On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote:
> > > I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ?
> > > Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for
> > > scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
> >
> > I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning
> p
Hi all,
I had pached the qmail with new SPAM CONTROL and trying smtp authentication
Now i need to try it whether it is working or not ..
for that i tried ..
>>telnet localhost 25
>>ehlo
250-domain.com
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250 SIZE 0
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN MD5-
>>Auth login
334 VXNlcm5hbW
onsdagen den 28 januari 2004 08.02 skrev Jeremy Kitchen:
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:45, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > > Or, try to apply the check user patch to the smtp server so the
> > > email never makes it into your queue.
> >
> > Would it be possible to make a domain that uses this technique but
>
Ok.. Vpopmail uses maildir++
I have an NFS export to store /home/vpopmail/domains
If I do a vuserinfo on a user it shows something like 92%
If I du -sh inside ~vpopmail/domains/domainname/theirhomedir
I'm only getting like 164Kb.
The quota isn't either being reset or lowered according to what
Girish wrote:
Hi all,
I had pached the qmail with new SPAM CONTROL and trying smtp authentication
Now i need to try it whether it is working or not ..
for that i tried ..
telnet localhost 25
ehlo
250-domain.com
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250 SIZE 0
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN MD5-
Auth
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 08:07 am, Tom Walsh wrote:
[snip]
> > > You can run:
> > >
> > > cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D
> >
> > you should be using spamc and not spamassassin.
> >
> > spamd/spamc is a much better combination, especially on
> > heavily loaded servers.
>
> Jer
On Jan 28, 2004, at 9:48 AM, Girish wrote:
I had pached the qmail with new SPAM CONTROL and trying smtp
authentication
Now i need to try it whether it is working or not ..
for that i tried ..
telnet localhost 25
ehlo
250-domain.com
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250 SIZE 0
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN MD5-x
Hi,
How do i limit the bandwidth for outgoing messages
?
One customer had used all my bandwidth send
messages.
I have 2 Mbps, and i would like to set 1024
kbps to mail services ( SMTP / POP ).
Is that possible ?
> How do i limit the bandwidth for outgoing messages ?
>
You should use a firewall -netfilter or something similar if your OS is
not linux- taht has the option to regulate comming and outgoing packets...
If there's a way to use any inter7 software to do such a thing I don't
know it
Juan
What is 'commerical' support?
KS
KARICO Business Services
Toronto, ON Canada
http://www.karico.ca
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 8:05 pm, KTS wrote:
> What is 'commerical' support?
It is support provided by a company for a fee.
Ken Jones
Hello,
You need to use netfilter for packet management. http://www.lartc.org
I would recommend using shorewall. http://www.shorewall.net
It is a straightforward way to make complex iptables rulsets.
It also supports traffic control. I use "wondershaper" (<-google that)
Regards,
Alex Martin
ht
21 matches
Mail list logo
