I've read some previous messages in the archive, regarding the possibility of
using PostgreSQL as a vpopmail backend. I hate to admit it, I haven't understood a
thing. Is the vpgsql module active by default ? There's no ./configure argument for
that, as in MySQL's case. I really can't f
i am useing qmail+vpop3+sqwebmail, now with pop3 it is working fine it is accepting username and password but when i am trying to sqwebmail it saying that username and password is incorrect , Please help me in this issue
Regards
MaheshDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, an
hi
I am useing qmail + vpopmail+sqwebmail on linux 8.0 i am able to login through pop3 but form sqwebmail it showing that username and password is worng please me some on this , how can i trable shoot it
regards
MaheshDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more
> I've read some previous messages in the archive, regarding the possibility
> of using PostgreSQL as a vpopmail backend. I hate to admit it, I haven't
> understood a thing. Is the vpgsql module active by default ? There's no
> ./configure argument for that, as in MySQL's case. I really can't find
hi.. just built 5.3.18 and i have a problem with vlimits.
it was a fresh install, i dropped any existing tables from the vpopmail mysql
database.
built with:
./configure --enable-roaming-users=y --enable-md5-passwords=y
--enable-mysql-logging=y --enable-users-big-dir=n --enable-mysql=y
--ena
solved.
increasing vmysql.c: SQL_BUF_SIZE to 2000 fixed it.
however i do get
delivery 6: success:
vnysql:_can't_find_limits_for_domain_'test.com'/did_0+0+1/
(with a type in it too.. vnysql => vmysql)
shouldn't it add some defaults when calling vadddomain ?
--
Best Regards,
Justin
Quoting Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 21 February 2003 16:04, Bill Shupp wrote:
> > On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 10:26 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > > Bill,
> > >
> > > Maybe this would be a good time to ask this question (I've
> > > asked it once before, but never got an
Ahh, good catch. I increased limits table structure to about twice
its original size, (more items added) and since my table already existed,
I didn't encounter the buffer overflow.
Since the original create failed, you'll need to delete and
add the domain again to get the row added to the tabl
Quoting Brian Kolaci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ahh, good catch. I increased limits table structure to about twice
> its original size, (more items added) and since my table already existed,
> I didn't encounter the buffer overflow.
>
> Since the original create failed, you'll need to delete an
