Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail quota bugs

2002-10-24 Thread Chris
i use vpopmail 5.3.8 with pop3d quota supported and sqwebmail 3.3.4. i had moved the email from "sent" folder to inbox. i think vpopmail should treat it as normal incoming email in inbox. any idea? Chris - Original Message - From: "Tren Blackburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL

[vchkpw] Vpopmail - Qmail - pop3d

2002-10-24 Thread Zeno Davatz
Hi I compiled qmail, vpopmail, checkpasswd, ucspi-tcp, daemontools form source. I follow 'lifewithqmail' as much as I can understand it. I also followed the Install-file of vpopmail and that says on line 203: env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ tcpserver -H -R 0 pop-3 \

RE: [vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster?

2002-10-24 Thread Michael Bowe
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Palmreuther [mailto:lists@;pitpalme.de] > Sent: Sunday, 13 October 2002 6:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster? > > > Hello Neo, > > On Saturday, October 12, 2002 at 7:30:16 PM you wrote: > > > I read t

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster?

2002-10-24 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Michael, On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:37:08 +1000 "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> $> cat /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto >> doublebounce >> $> cat ~alias/.qmail-doublebounceto > I think that line above have been : "cat ~alias/.qmail-doublebounce" ? Yes, you're correct. Wasn't cop

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail - Qmail - pop3d

2002-10-24 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Zeno, On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:36:39 +0200 Zeno Davatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I follow 'lifewithqmail' as much as I can understand it. I also > followed the Install-file of vpopmail and that says on line 203: > > env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \ > tcpserver -H -R 0 pop

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail quota bugs

2002-10-24 Thread Rick Romero
Are you sure they're not marked as Read, and maybe your POP email client is set to only download unread mail? Rick On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 02:12, Chris wrote: > > i use vpopmail 5.3.8 with pop3d quota supported and sqwebmail 3.3.4. i had > moved the email from "sent" folder to inbox. i think vpopm

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail - Qmail - pop3d

2002-10-24 Thread Zeno Davatz
On 24.10.2002 14:14 Uhr, "Peter Palmreuther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Replace 'tcpserver' with the the complete path-call to tcpserver (maybe > '/usr/local/bin/tcpserver'?) Thanks for the hint. > Counting the number problems you have with setting up a simple mail > server and the simpleness o

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail - Qmail - pop3d

2002-10-24 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Zeno, On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:27:50 +0200 Zeno Davatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Counting the number problems you have with setting up a simple mail >> server and the simpleness of a lot of your problems (second time a >> path problem, IIRC) you should consider to engage somebody that is >>

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail - Qmail - pop3d

2002-10-24 Thread Zeno Davatz
On 24.10.2002 15:23 Uhr, "Peter Palmreuther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Zeno, > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:27:50 +0200 > Zeno Davatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Counting the number problems you have with setting up a simple mail >>> server and the simpleness of a lot of your problems (se

[vchkpw] vpopbull Question

2002-10-24 Thread Michael Funk
Greetings, I'm trying to use vpopbull to broadcast a message to all my users. Drive space is critical and I'd like to use the -h flag to softlink the file containing the message, but it looks hoaky. Does it work??? Also, whenever I do "./vpopbull -vn mydomain.net" from the /home/vpopmail/bin di

Re: [vchkpw] vpopbull Question

2002-10-24 Thread Andres Junge Mac-Evoy
DonĀ“t know about the symlink. About the vpopbull -vn you shoud use "./vpopbull -v -n mydomain.net" This how it works for me. Salu2 Andres At 09:11 24/10/2002 -0500, Michael Funk wrote: Greetings, I'm trying to use vpopbull to broadcast a message to all my users. Drive space is critical an

RE: [vchkpw] vqadmin problem

2002-10-24 Thread Clayton Weise
Does the permission denied error come from apache or vqadmin? Tail your apache error log and see what it says. -Clayton -Original Message- From: zafar [mailto:zafar_f3@;my.web.pk] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] vqadmin problem hello a

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Debian

2002-10-24 Thread Zeno Davatz
On 24.10.2002 3:14 Uhr, "Iain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try my up to date debian vpopmail packages here: > > http://linux.myspinach.org/debian \snip David Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Change the run script for qmail-smtpd (/service/qmail-smtpd/run) to use vpopmail. The tcp.smtp.cdb file ne

[vchkpw] temporarily disable delivery & retrieval for a domain

2002-10-24 Thread Justin R. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to do a migration to some new hardware over NFS, however the details aren't that important. Basically I need to know if there is a way to temporarily disable delivery and retrieval for a domain for a short amount of time. I read someplace

RE: [vchkpw] smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread vpopmail
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 11:10, Clayton Weise wrote: > Just stick your hostname in place of the IP address. I don't think an IP > will work.. I've never tried it though ;). Hrm, well, this is quite strange. It's taking the IP from which I'm trying to send the mail and putting that in place of the h

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Debian

2002-10-24 Thread Zeno Davatz
First of all: THANKS for the great advice. Took me some steps further. On 24.10.2002 2:06 Uhr, "David Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Allow incoming connections to pop3d. By default, it does not allow any > connections. There is an add-client script in > /var/qmail/service/qmail-pop3d

RE: [vchkpw] smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread vpopmail
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 10:17, Clayton Weise wrote: > Yes, that's what I was referring to. The FQDN is there only for MD5-CRAM if > my memory serves correct. It is not actually used in any way for > authenticating the username. It's there for a challenge-response system. > The fact that it's missi

Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
Hi John, version 5.2.1 no extra compile option. TIA,Paulo Henrique Quoting John Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira writes: > > > Hi all, > > I installed qmail smtp-remote-auth patch. It works well for outlook > >

[vchkpw] Re: smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread John Johnson
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira writes: Hi all, I installed qmail smtp-remote-auth patch. It works well for outlook client but with eudora it fails. What I can do to fix this? TIA, Paulo Henrique What version of vpopmail are you running and what are your compile options? -John

Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
Hi all, I installed qmail smtp-remote-auth patch. It works well for outlook client but with eudora it fails. What I can do to fix this? TIA,Paulo Henrique Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 08:30, Clayton Weise wrote: > > How

RE: [vchkpw] smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread vpopmail
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 08:30, Clayton Weise wrote: > How do you startup qmail-smtpd? Hi Clayton, thanks for the reply. Tunc Gunergun noted that this behaviour is symptomatic of running qmail-smtpd without a hostname after it. Is that what you were thinking? But how does this effect the other v

[vchkpw] Re: qmailadmin-limits update

2002-10-24 Thread John Johnson
I am not a programmer but from what I can see this looks like a clean and very efective way to do the qmailadmin-limits. If you try to bloat things down for something that MIGHT be added or changed then we really will not have things really planned, they will be half planned and still open waiting

[vchkpw] qmailadmin-limits update

2002-10-24 Thread Brian Kolaci
I've done some thinking about the many suggestions about handling the limits and wanted to summarize some of the pros & cons. First was whether to use a generic approach that had a table with domain, name, value which has a row for each parameter, or to use a single row will all values per domain

Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Probably you use OpenSSL 0.9.6e, at least, and Eudora has problems talking TLS with new versions of OpenSSL (it talks with 0.9.6c, that has security holes). You must add this (+) line in qmail-smtpd.c: void smtp_tls(arg) char *arg; { SSL_C

RE: [vchkpw] smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread Clayton Weise
Yes, that's what I was referring to. The FQDN is there only for MD5-CRAM if my memory serves correct. It is not actually used in any way for authenticating the username. It's there for a challenge-response system. The fact that it's missing from your startup would be why it wouldn't work (or, wo

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Debian

2002-10-24 Thread Zeno Davatz
On 24.10.2002 2:06 Uhr, "David Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Install vpopmail from source. The Debian packages are pretty old and seem > to be buggy, at least the last time I tried. I done this... > * Change the run script for qmail-smtpd (/service/qmail-smtpd/run) to use > vpopmail.

[vchkpw] IP Domains and Courier IMAP

2002-10-24 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi All, Does anyone have IP Domains (ie just user instead of user@domain) and courier-imap working together with any version of vpopmail and courier-imap? I think from my testing that it's just plain broken, but I'd like to hear if any does have it working. Oh, forgot to mention, using couriertcp

[vchkpw] creating vpasswd from vpasswd.cdb

2002-10-24 Thread Bryce C
Does anyone have a util to create a vpasswd file from a vpasswd.cdb file? I couldn't find anything in the archives or in the bin dir to do this. I don't know if it is fixed in the devel versions but all previous versions seem to have an issue with zeroing out the vpasswd file when the disk is ful

Re: [vchkpw] creating vpasswd from vpasswd.cdb

2002-10-24 Thread Justin R. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Bryce C on Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:13PM -0700: > Does anyone have a util to create a vpasswd file from a vpasswd.cdb > file? I think that cdbtools comes with a cdbdump. - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email pre

Re: [vchkpw] creating vpasswd from vpasswd.cdb

2002-10-24 Thread Bryce C
--- "Justin R. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that cdbtools comes with a cdbdump. > Any location for that? google is revealing much. Also, does anyone know if bin/vconvert is supposed to be able to do this? Nothing I've tried has worked :( I'm using 5.2 by the way. Thanks

Re: [vchkpw] creating vpasswd from vpasswd.cdb

2002-10-24 Thread Justin R. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Bryce C on Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:16:37PM -0700: > Any location for that? google is revealing much. http://cr.yp.to/cdb.html - -- [!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR

[vchkpw] Vpopmail Exploits on Bugtraq

2002-10-24 Thread K a z
Have the remote exploits that came out on BugTraq today been addressed at all? Here are the links: http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/297002/2002-10-21/2002-10-27/0 http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/297021/2002-10-21/2002-10-27/0 ___

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Exploits on Bugtraq

2002-10-24 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
Read the articles from beginning to end, and you'll find the answer. Note - it's not an exploit in vpopmail. At 02:33 PM 10/24/2002, K a z wrote: Have the remote exploits that came out on BugTraq today been addressed at all? Here are the links: http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/297

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Exploits on Bugtraq

2002-10-24 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, How do these relate to vpopmail itself? The vpopmail-CGIApps is the program with the exploit. Regards, Rick - Original Message - From: "K a z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:33 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Exploits on Bugtraq

Re: [vchkpw] IP Domains and Courier IMAP

2002-10-24 Thread Bill Shupp
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 01:54 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi All, Does anyone have IP Domains (ie just user instead of user@domain) and courier-imap working together with any version of vpopmail and courier-imap? I think from my testing that it's just plain broken, but I'd like to he

Re: [vchkpw] IP Domains and Courier IMAP

2002-10-24 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi Bill, Original response below, but one question... Why does it work when using tcpserver (but I'll still take a look a preauthvchkpw.c) ie tcpserver -R -t 2 -g 89 -u 89 0 110 /usr/lib/courier-imap/sbin/pop3login \ /usr/lib/courier-imap/libexec/authlib/authvchkpw /usr/lib/courier-imap/bin/

Re: [vchkpw] IP Domains and Courier IMAP

2002-10-24 Thread Bill Shupp
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 03:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi Bill, Original response below, but one question... Why does it work when using tcpserver (but I'll still take a look a preauthvchkpw.c) ie tcpserver -R -t 2 -g 89 -u 89 0 110 /usr/lib/courier-imap/sbin/pop3login \ /us

Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread Kit Halsted
At 1:46 PM -0200 10/24/02, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote: Hi John, version 5.2.1 no extra compile option. TIA, Paulo Henrique Somebody flame me if I'm wrong, but IIRC vpopmail 5.2.1 will not work with SMTP-AUTH & Eudora. Eudora requires CRAM-MD5, so vpopmail 5.3.6 looks like t

Re: [vchkpw] temporarily disable delivery & retrieval for a domain

2002-10-24 Thread Anders Brander
Hi, On Thursday 24 October 2002 22:29, you wrote: [snip] > 1) if there is a comparable way to defer delivery for a virtual domain, > similar to setting the sticky bit on a home directory How about a .qmail-default like this?: |exit 111 - That would make the mail-delivery fail temporarily (afaik)

Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp-auth

2002-10-24 Thread vpopmail
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 15:35, Kit Halsted wrote: > > Somebody flame me if I'm wrong, but IIRC vpopmail 5.2.1 will not work > with SMTP-AUTH & Eudora. Eudora requires CRAM-MD5, so vpopmail 5.3.6 > looks like the minimum version for your requirements. (5.3.9 is up on > the dev page, 5.3.11 is the m

Re: [vchkpw] temporarily disable delivery & retrieval for a domain

2002-10-24 Thread Justin R. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Anders Brander on Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:38:21AM +0200: > How about a .qmail-default like this?: > |exit 111 > > - That would make the mail-delivery fail temporarily (afaik), and > qmail would try again later. Thanks for the tip, but I think t

[vchkpw] courier + roaming users = how can it possibly work

2002-10-24 Thread Nathan Neulinger
As near as I can tell from the courier auth*vchkpw.c code, it only triggers either the vset_lastauth or the open_smtp_relay() routines BEFORE authentication. What good is that? Two problems - 1. The way it calls vset_lastauth in the pre* code means that you can have a denial of service r

Re: [vchkpw] temporarily disable delivery & retrieval for a domain

2002-10-24 Thread Justin R. Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Justin R. Miller on Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 07:14:23PM -0400: > As for the retrieval, I see that if you limit POP3 and/or IMAP access > via vqadmin, it places a .qmailadmin-limits file with the lines > disable_pop and/or disable_imap lines in it. H

Re: [vchkpw] temporarily disable delivery & retrieval for a domain

2002-10-24 Thread Anders Brander
Hi, On Friday 25 October 2002 01:14, you wrote: > Said Anders Brander on Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:38:21AM +0200: > > How about a .qmail-default like this?: > > |exit 111 > > - That would make the mail-delivery fail temporarily (afaik), and > > qmail would try again later. > Thanks for the tip, but

Re: [vchkpw] IP Domains and Courier IMAP

2002-10-24 Thread Bill Shupp
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 03:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi Bill, Original response below, but one question... Why does it work when using tcpserver (but I'll still take a look a preauthvchkpw.c) ie tcpserver -R -t 2 -g 89 -u 89 0 110 /usr/lib/courier-imap/sbin/pop3login \ /us

Re: [vchkpw] IP Domains and Courier IMAP

2002-10-24 Thread Bill Shupp
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 05:31 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 03:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi Bill, Original response below, but one question... Why does it work when using tcpserver (but I'll still take a look a preauthvchkpw.c) ie tcpserver -R -

RE: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Exploits on Bugtraq

2002-10-24 Thread John Johnson
The exploits are for a 3rd part web based admin.. Nothing in vpopmail or Qmailadmin from what I Can see.. -John -Original Message- From: K a z [mailto:ikazdek@;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Vpopmail Exploits on Bugtraq

Re: [vchkpw] IP Domains and Courier IMAP

2002-10-24 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi Bill, I'm running 5.3.8 and I am running without authdaemon (ie --without-authdaemon). I'll try the patch later on tonight or first thing in the morning (I have little one's to put to bed now). Thanks for the help. Regards, Rick - Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [vchkpw] courier + roaming users = how can it possibly work

2002-10-24 Thread Bill Shupp
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 04:30 PM, Nathan Neulinger wrote: As near as I can tell from the courier auth*vchkpw.c code, it only triggers either the vset_lastauth or the open_smtp_relay() routines BEFORE authentication. What good is that? Two problems - 1. The way it calls vset_lastauth

[vchkpw] Re: temporarily disable delivery & retrieval for a domain

2002-10-24 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Justin, On Thursday, October 24, 2002 at 10:29:12 PM you wrote: > 1) if there is a comparable way to defer delivery for a virtual domain, > similar to setting the sticky bit on a home directory Shut down the SMTP server. The mails that would like to come in from outside should sit in mail

[vchkpw] vpopmail & qmail

2002-10-24 Thread Joeffrey Betita
we have multiple domain. like [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. my email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] when somebody email me using other domain. i receive it. my question is how can i configure in vpopmail. so that i don't receive it and the error message should no such user. pls h