Re: [vchkpw] ps

Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? Cause when I chroot my qmail it doesn't have ps, nor does it have /proc - Original Message - From: "Gabriel Ambuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Raboo Treed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 13,

RE: [vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster?

I read that but it still send to the postmaster of the domain... Qmail control file - doublebounceto | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' delete - Please advise -Original Message- From: Peter Palmreuther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:53 PM T

[vchkpw] Re: Delete bounced msg to postmaster?

Hello Neo, On Saturday, October 12, 2002 at 7:30:16 PM you wrote: > I read that but it still send to the postmaster of the domain... $> cat /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto doublebounce $> cat ~alias/.qmail-doublebounceto # $> -- Best regards Peter Palmreuther

Re: [vchkpw] ps

Hi Raboo Treed, you wrote. RT> why does for example vadddomain and vdeldomain require /bin/ps ??? So that it can HUP qmail? Regards, Gabriel

[vchkpw] ps

why does for example vadddomain and vdeldomain require /bin/ps ???

Re: [vchkpw] ps

At 01:55 PM 10/13/02 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: >Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? No. ps output is always right, an old pid file could point to the wrong process. Rick

Re: [vchkpw] ps

At 13:55 13/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: >Isn't it better to make vpopmail leave a pid file instead then? Sure, if Vpopmail actually had a daemonized process, but it doesn't. "ps" is used to find the pid of whatever Qmail process (qmail-send, qmails-smtpd etc etc) that needs to be restar

Re: [vchkpw] ps

sence no one is using an unpatched qmail it shuldn't be hard to do cause how will it do in a chroot enviroment? - Original Message - From: "Steve Fulton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:42 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] ps > At 13:55 13/10/2002 +

Re: [vchkpw] ps

At 00:04 14/10/2002 +0200, Raboo Treed wrote: >sence no one is using an unpatched qmail it shuldn't be hard to do >cause how will it do in a chroot enviroment? Perhaps I misunderstand you, but whether Qmail is patched or not has nothing to do with Vpopmail's use of "ps" to determine a pid of w

[vchkpw] vqsignup+send_welcome.c

Hi the vqsignup 0.5 have a file send_welcome.c ... the line snprintf(b, 255, "%s/etc/welcome/%s", VPOPMAILDIR, domain); is supposing send a welcome message to the new user sign up ? where does the welcome reside ? in /usr/home/vpopmail/etc thanks sean ___

[vchkpw] vconvert problem - ignoring one user

Hi I'm having a problem running vconvert -c -m to convert our installation from CDB files to MySQL. Out of 243 users accross 61 domain names only one user is not imported. The domain name has a hyphin in it ("-") - would this cause the problem perhaps? There is only one user in this domain. T

[vchkpw] how to return bounce email

hello all  i want to know to know how qmail send return back the invalid email. what configuration required. Sqwebmail is working in this pattern fine but i am trying to make a client and i give facility for that thing. so how can i mail bounce back to user who send it. plz guide me.