Hi,
Is it possible for the next/future release to include the ability of
adding multiple aliases in one hit goverened by repeated "-i" options?
eg:
valias -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] -i [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
where currently, only the last "-i "reference is the only alias inserted.
On 2007-09-20, at 1134, Tom Collins wrote:
I can't think of a time when you'd use the option to set the
encrypted password directly, but it's there in case someone needs
it...
if you're converting a domain from /etc/passwd to vpopmail, and the
plain-text passwords aren't available.
if
Hi Tom,
Tom Collins wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Quey wrote:
Is it possible to have vmoduser modified so that changing a password
with a new -$option changes both encrypted and clear text passwords
in one run?
It already does that. When you set the clear password, it also
updates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Collins wrote:
> I can't think of a time when you'd use the option to set the encrypted
> password directly, but it's there in case someone needs it...
We've used it during conversions from other MTAs. It can be quite handy :)
- --
/*
Matt Br
On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Quey wrote:
Is it possible to have vmoduser modified so that changing a
password with a new -$option changes both encrypted and clear
text passwords in one run?
It already does that. When you set the clear password, it also
updates the encrypted password.
Hi,
Is it possible to have vmoduser modified so that changing a password
with a new -$option changes both encrypted and clear text passwords in
one run?
Sort of like: ./vmoduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] -P test
would change the password for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to test in both clear
text format a
Thanks! I'm sorry if it is/was a FAQ. I looked (I thought) thoroughly.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Feature request: per-user wildcards/catchall
On Thu, 2004-04-
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 14:51, Dan Grigsby wrote:
> Hi,
> I used qmail’s per-user wildcard system. Using this, I can do user
> dash something at host dot com. For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am writing a little hack for myself to rewrite the messages to have
> a non-wildcard name and add an ext
Hi,
I used qmail’s per-user wildcard system. Using this,
I can do user dash something at host dot com. For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to continue to once I move to vpopmail. This
would have to be supported vdelivermail, I suppose, since the /home/vpopmail/domains/dom
Hello Red Herring
Nick Harring writes:
> This whole argument is ridiculous.
Correct. So far I havw seen only one person post a sensible response,
You are NOT that person...
> The correctness of design doesn't really rely on what some random users
> first guess of how it should work would be,
Paul L. Allen wrote:
Erik Bourget writes:
You know, intense as this whole argument is, the fact remains that DWIM
is no substitute for proper documentation.
Let's see, the documentation says vaddaliasdomain original alias.
If you do what the documentation says, it works. If you reverse t
Paul, quit emailing me offlist. I don't give a crap what kind of
drunken binge you are on.
Damm, I'll I did was offer a simple solution to a problem.
Just STFU and let it go.
Erik Bourget writes:
> You know, intense as this whole argument is, the fact remains that DWIM
> is no substitute for proper documentation.
Let's see, the documentation says vaddaliasdomain original alias.
If you do what the documentation says, it works. If you reverse the
arguments, it still w
Erik Bourget wrote:
"Paul L. Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Because vpopmail bridges so many divides, it cannot intuit what you want.
It doesn't know if you're using cdb for everything or using MySQL for
everything or whatever unless you tell it. But, wherever possible, it
should be DWIM.
Hi Anders
Anders Brander writes:
> Hummm Or something like:
> "... the two domains to be aliased ..." - without saying which is which,
> for the user it doesn't matter much.
Oh Anders, I need rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty! It's
because I'm a boring old fart that I desperate
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:46, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> > I think we should just ignore the "old" way of calling vaddaliasdomain
> > in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the "new" way of
> > doing things.
> Ummm, that implies that one way is more "correct" than the other. I do
>
X-Istence writes:
>
> This is my patch, it doesnt allow for both types, but does what you want
> :).
It does do what I want, and if that were my only concern I have other
solutions that I could use. I would like both options to be available so
that those who have one preference can get exactl
Hi Anders
Anders Brander writes:
> I think we should just ignore the "old" way of calling vaddaliasdomain
> in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the "new" way of
> doing things.
Ummm, that implies that one way is more "correct" than the other. I do
not believe that to be the
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:26, Paul L. Allen wrote:
> > A bit odd to document,
> Damn right. I still haven't figured out a sensible usage message.
I think we should just ignore the "old" way of calling vaddaliasdomain
in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the "new" way of
doin
Stop bickering please, common.
Difference between the origional and that what i changed around
Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c
56c56,57
< printf("vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain
real_domain\n");
---
> /* printf("vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alia
Anders Brander writes:
> A bit odd to document,
Damn right. I still haven't figured out a sensible usage message.
> but otherwise a fabulous idea.
Bad Anders. Bad, bad, Anders. Letting people do what they find
easiest is BAD. Ask the people who criticised me for suggesting it.
> Pleas
Toasterz Admin writes:
> Paul L. Allen wrote:
>
> >Toasterz Admin writes:
> >Actually, you're wrong.
> >
> how could i be wrong just because you say it's so.
What a wonderfully compelling argument. How could you possibly be
wrong just because I say so? Ummm, wait, you called me wrong
bec
Hi,
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 23:31, Tom Collins wrote:
> > A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a configure option
> > (best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses the order
> > of the two arguments. I'd like it for two reasons:
> What if it
Stop bickering please, common.
Difference between the origional and that what i changed around
Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c
56c56,57
< printf("vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain
real_domain\n");
---
> /* printf("vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alia
carefully before you post about the pet
annoyance with which you're infatuated. contribute something real.
send that 10 second script with your whiny feature request.
you really ought to apoligize to the list for your bad behavior.
Ummm, and a few other things you missed about Open Sou
Paul L. Allen wrote:
You don't read so good, do you?
snappy opener, i wonder what prompted this? whiners hate being called
whiners.
you are obviously a person who loves to whine and when not whining,
likes to rage.
am i correct in this? no need to reply, i'm confident in my analysis.
a better on
JB writes:
> A one line bash script, which I provided
Sorrry, I did not see your attachment in any of your posts. Please
repost it so that we all can benefit and the vpopmail maintainers can
distribute your wonderful script (if they think it is a sensible
solution).
> will do the job for Milli
A one line bash script, which I provided will do the job for Millions of
people.
You could have fixed the problem yourself in less then 10 seconds,
instead, you flame me.
You are a fucking twit
Paul L. Allen wrote:
You don't read so good, do you?
JB writes:
Write a shell script that t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Gotta give this Paul guy a round of applause.
Indeed. I know you meant that ironically, but I understand your
misperceptions.
> I have never seen anyone who uses his sheer incompetency as a brutal
> attack weapon. Have you ?
Many, many times when I have dealt wit
your eyes closed so we
won't feel too imposing.
Thanks in advance for the patch.
Lu
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul L. Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:07 PM
> To: JB
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Feature re
You don't read so good, do you?
JB writes:
> Write a shell script that takes the arguments in the order you want and
> pass them to vaddaliasdomain in the order expected,
I already explained that while I am more than capable of coming up with
that idea and implementing it all by myself, that s
The worst one of our clients has managed so far is 13, added in dribs and
drabs of two or three at a time. For one it makes no difference. For
hundreds I'd go the perl script reading a text file route. For twos and
threes the current argument order of vaddaliasdomain is annoying.
Write a she
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 09:16 AM, Paul L. Allen wrote:
A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a configure option
(best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses the order
of
the two arguments. I'd like it for two reasons:
What if it was auto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If you do this often enough, why not just write a simple little shell
> script to accomplish this:
I'm way ahead of you. It asks for the main domain, the postmaster password
and prompts for alias domains (finishing if nothing is entered for an
alias. Then it sets t
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [vchkpw] Feature request for vaddaliasdomain
>
>
>
> A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a
> configure option
> (best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses
> the order of the two arguments. I'd like it
A feature request for vaddaliasdomin. I would like a configure option
(best) or a command-line switch (not so good) that reverses the order of
the two arguments. I'd like it for two reasons:
1) It is then the same order as for ln (original, alias) so easier to
remember if they'r
sorry, accidently replyed to the Kiril, sorry mate.
- Original Message -
From: "Raboo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kiril Todorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] feature request
> no man, like /home/vpop
Yeah :)
--enable-extra-defaults=path/to/file
and just append the contents of that file to the .qmail-default.
I like that :-)
--
Kiril Todorov < -+- > +359 2 9712013
Bulgaria Online < -+- > http://home.online.bg
/* waiting... dreaming... wishing... */
Hi
There should be like --with-.qmail-default-option-thingy='whatever that
should be in the .qmail file that should be created during user adding.'
for vpopmail.
If you guys get what i mean...
Word!
/Raboo
> It should be possible, with a change to vset_default_domain in
> vpopmail.c (and maybe some other locations). Either that, or make sure
> that other references to DEFAULT_DOMAIN are removed and
> vset_default_domain is used instead.
Ok I will look into that, thank you.
> Note that vpopmail wil
That wheel has already been invented. Check out
~vpopmail/bin/vmkpasswd
Matt
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 09:06 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
I'd like to request a feature (I'll probably supply a patch in a few
days
anyway) which would add an -r (regenerate) option to vpasswd to take
the
e
I'd like to request a feature (I'll probably supply a patch in a few days
anyway) which would add an -r (regenerate) option to vpasswd to take the
existing vpasswd file and regenerate a vpasswd.cdb file for a domain.
Before I go and do this (hopefully trivial) patch, is this the only way to
reg
Very nice work Tonino.
I've taken a look at your patch and I like it. Fortunately for me,
last week I moved my last "system users" domain into vpopmail so all my
mail domains are virtual. Having done that, I can actually use your
patch now. I've build it into my Mail Toaster Mega-Patch (ver
> Hi Anders,
>
> > > Does anyone know a workaround until either vpopmail reads SSLREMOTEIP
> > > or ucspi-ssl sets TCPREMOTEIP?
> >
> > How about something like (untested):
> > "(env TCPREMOTEIP=$SSLREMOTEIP /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw)"
> > in your startup script instead of just "
Hi Anders,
> > Does anyone know a workaround until either vpopmail reads SSLREMOTEIP
> > or ucspi-ssl sets TCPREMOTEIP?
>
> How about something like (untested):
> "(env TCPREMOTEIP=$SSLREMOTEIP /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw)"
> in your startup script instead of just "/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw" ?
I t
HI guys I know this is OT but is there a way that you may
know to have quota setting configuration only on specific domains? Maybe just specifying the option in the .qmailadmin
settings.
THANKS,
REMO
On 3 Mar 2003, Jonas Pasche wrote:
> The drawback is that tcpserver sets (besides others) the environment
> variable TCPREMOTEIP, which vchkpw uses for logging and for opening
> dynamic relays. sslserver from the ucspi-ssl package set SSLREMOTEIP
> instead, which causes vchkpw to stop logging IP a
Hi,
On Monday 03 March 2003 00:44, Jonas Pasche wrote:
> Does anyone know a workaround until either vpopmail reads SSLREMOTEIP
> or ucspi-ssl sets TCPREMOTEIP?
How about something like (untested):
"(env TCPREMOTEIP=$SSLREMOTEIP /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw)"
in your startup script instead of just "/
Hi out there,
I have a small feature request for vpopmail. Currently, I'm checking out
if I could successfully use ucspi-ssl instead of ucspi-tcp for accepting
network connections. Things are a lot easier with this tool, because you
can simple set up your SSL certificates and replace "
> -Original Message-
> From: Davide Giunchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:56 AM
> To: Rhett Hermer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
>
>
> Il 09:13, venerdì 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Herme
Il 09:13, venerdì 7 febbraio 2003, Rhett Hermer ha scritto:
> If djb doesn't want to improve qmail with all of those patches et al, then
> what's stopping us to write new MTA based on qmail design? Is there any
> restriction that I am not aware of?
I don't think that anybody here want to write yet
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
> > Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
> > required each of those patches? I've been running a
> > qm
This has been an ongoing argument on the qmail list. Some 'purists' believe
that there is no need for any patch apart from QMAILQUEUE which dan has
indicated he will probably include in the next version.
While I was initially sceptical about this I can see some logic in what they
are saying. Ta
> I just use vpopmail and tcpserver here. Was that insufficient for your
> needs or does the method you describe offer something more/different? I
> have quite a few concurrent pop3 users (maybe 50-70, not 100 [yet]) and
> maybe half of that in IMAP sessions but haven't run into any problems with
> - smtp-auth-relaying: useful for big lan with some external users
> - smtp-after-pop: vpopmail feature that do this is good for small traffic
> network, but when you have 100 or more concurrent connection to the pop3
> you cannot use binary file but you must use a database.
I just use vpopmail a
> Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
> required each of those patches? I've been running a
> qmail/vpopmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin setup for the past year now and have
> yet to actually find need for a patch.
There's a lot of needs that plain qmail doesn't suite o
> Just out of genuine curiosity, were you actually seeing problems that
> required each of those patches? I've been running a
> qmail/vpopmail/sqwebmail/qmailadmin setup for the past year now and have
> yet to actually find need for a patch.
Not problems per se, but rather features I would like t
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:02:36 -0500 Andrew Kohlsmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What I would like to see is a update made to the qmail smtp daemon
>> so it will look up the email account and return a "failure 500" message.
>> Then by default, the email addresses that don't match woul
> yes, patch upon patches... the same thing that other's qmail administrator
> has done. For this reaseon i've proposed the project described in my
> previous mail about this thread.
Exactly. I'm saying I've _got_ a master patch that does this, and none of the
patches in the master list are esot
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Qmailadmin feature request
>
>
> > > I believe you're using the wr
> qmail-0.0.0.0
> qmail-1.03-qmtpc
> qmail-bouncecontrol
> qmail-1.03-tls
> netscape-progress
> qmail-send.mimeheaders
> qmail-pop3d+vpomail
>
yes, patch upon patches... the same thing that other's qmail administrator has
done. For this reaseon i've proposed the project described in my previous
> > I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
> > Qmail is the "a patchy mail server" of mail servers.
> I keep hoping that will change sometime soon. :) I guess no-one has
> released a patch that everyone just can't do without though.
I've put together a monster patch
I think that is time to create a "qmail GPL project" , "qmail megapatch
project" or something similiar a big patch developed in gpl'd like
project.
The problem is that patching a qmail mail server is very common, and when you
have to apply a lot of patch to the same source you can't do it a
On Thursday 06 February 2003 11:04, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > And secondly, I don't like patches.
>
> I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
> Qmail is the "a patchy mail server" of mail servers.
I keep hoping that will change sometime soon. :) I guess no-one has
re
> And secondly, I don't like patches.
I believe you're using the wrong MTA if you don't like patches. :-)
Qmail is the "a patchy mail server" of mail servers.
Regards,
Andrew
> > Hey, one of my clients bought a domain which was previously held by
> > someone else. This of course meant that lots and lots of spammers were
> > sending mails to a couple addresses on that domain, and he'd like to be
> > able to mark certain explicit addresses for bouncing, while retaining t
On Thursday 06 February 2003 01:49, Ken Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:22, you wrote:
> It would be great if you knew of any C programmers with a few
> hours to spare. then we could hook vpopmail into qmail-smtpd
> and block the email right at the front door.
I know C, and I oc
Hello Ken,
On Thursday, February 6, 2003 at 7:49:33 AM you [KJ] wrote (at least
in part):
> It would be great if you knew of any C programmers with a few
> hours to spare. then we could hook vpopmail into qmail-smtpd
> and block the email right at the front door.
You might have missed it, but th
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:22, you wrote:
> Hey, one of my clients bought a domain which was previously held by someone
> else. This of course meant that lots and lots of spammers were sending
> mails to a couple addresses on that domain, and he'd like to be able to
> mark certain explicit a
Hi Brian,
the versions you see on my website are tailored for vpopmail, so they
handle every kind of user vpopmail handles, valias and .qmail aliases,
ezmlm mailing lists.
It may be easily customized for other handlers. A lot of people asked me,
and they realized the same control out of vpopma
Hi,
Its definitely a qmail patch, not vpopmail. You should contact
the qmail list or homepage to have it listed there instead.
I see from your page that it checks vpopmail users, but what
about regular shell accounts? Also, does it do the .qmail file
processing for normal accounts, maillists,
Hi Eduardo,
my patch basically modifies qmail-smtpd.c code, using vpopmail libraries.
So, it may be seen practically in the category "qmail patch", not "vpopmail
patch".
As any patch, it may not work if someone applied other patches before, so I
don't think it may be right to include it in vpo
Hello,
I want to know your opinion about including this patch like an option
(selecting in configure) on vpopmail code. Spammers generate a lot of traffic
of emails to unknown users and server could stop it with this. Performance
seems to be normal. Opinions?
http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/
n though.
-- Steve
>- Original Message -
>From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:15 AM
>Subject: [vchkpw] feature request
>
>
> >
> > probably not possible.
You can add as many additional fields as desired if you run the vpopmail
with the MySQL backend
Michael.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:15 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] feature
At 01:40 PM 10/10/2002, Justin Heesemann wrote:
>On Thursday 10 October 2002 20:15, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> > probably not possible. but i was wondering if there's any way an additional
> > 'comment' field could be added to vpopmail. reasoning: we have one 'mai
> >
>i don't know.. buy what ab
On Thursday 10 October 2002 20:15, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> probably not possible. but i was wondering if there's any way an additional
> 'comment' field could be added to vpopmail. reasoning: we have one 'main'
> domain where customers who don't have their own domain can get a personal
> emai
probably not possible. but i was wondering if there's any way an additional
'comment' field could be added to vpopmail. reasoning: we have one 'main'
domain where customers who don't have their own domain can get a personal
email address. we have several hundred of them. we'd like a way to
as
> First: Bug fix.
>
> Fix the vdelivermail crashing problem I described a while back:
>
>postmaster set's user account bob as default delivery.
>user deletes bob's pop account
>messages delivered by default rule (for bobs maildir) crash
>vdelivermail.
>
> If
hacked support into tcpserver (publicly available on my web site) to
query the
MySQL database directly so constantly updating those files is a waste of
CPU and disk.
Code changes to accomplish this are at:
http://matt.simerson.net/computing/qmail/vpopmail-4.9.10-opensmtp-patch.txt
Th
Bill Shupp wrote:
>
> on 3/15/01 8:29 PM, Ken Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I wasn't able to reproduce this on my test machine.
> > Hard for me to fix it then.
> > Ken
>
> Ken,
>
> I'm sorry I can't provide a fix myself. I would if I had the C skills. But
> here's a sample of what
on 3/15/01 8:29 PM, Ken Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wasn't able to reproduce this on my test machine.
> Hard for me to fix it then.
> Ken
Ken,
I'm sorry I can't provide a fix myself. I would if I had the C skills. But
here's a sample of what I'm seeing (with today's 4.9.9 release).
Bill Shupp wrote:
>
> on 3/12/01 3:28 PM, Matt Simerson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have two issues: The first is a feature request for the vmoduser program.
> > It appears that at present there is no way to disable qmailadmin. This would
> > be a most welco
Andras Kende wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone can help me with this:
>
> latest development vpopmail 4.9.9
>
> ./configure --enable-ip-alias-domains=y
>
> trying to use vipmap:
>
> ./vipmap -a 216.179.218.21 kende.net
> ./vipmap -a 216.179.218.X domain1.com
>
> but
>
> ./vipmap -p doesn't p
data, how should i debug what happening???
Thanks :)
Andras
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Cope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "vchkpw / vpopmail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Marc
Ken Jones wrote:
>
> Greg Cope wrote:
> >
> > Dear All
> >
> > I used vmkpasswd to recreate the vpasswd.cdb files as I hade moved
> > vpopmail from one machine to another, and changed the install dir to
> > /var/vpopmail.
> >
> > When run it changes the owner/group to whom ever is running it (in
Greg Cope wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> I used vmkpasswd to recreate the vpasswd.cdb files as I hade moved
> vpopmail from one machine to another, and changed the install dir to
> /var/vpopmail.
>
> When run it changes the owner/group to whom ever is running it (in my
> case root). I did not notice
Dear All
I used vmkpasswd to recreate the vpasswd.cdb files as I hade moved
vpopmail from one machine to another, and changed the install dir to
/var/vpopmail.
When run it changes the owner/group to whom ever is running it (in my
case root). I did not notice this and it then broke bits of qmail
on 3/12/01 3:28 PM, Matt Simerson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have two issues: The first is a feature request for the vmoduser program.
> It appears that at present there is no way to disable qmailadmin. This would
> be a most welcome addition to the vmoduser program and hopef
I have two issues: The first is a feature request for the vmoduser program.
It appears that at present there is no way to disable qmailadmin. This would
be a most welcome addition to the vmoduser program and hopefully more people
than I would find it useful to be able to easily disable a domains
I'd really really love to see the POP3 'Index' feature
make it's way into the forwarding accounts list. I
have hundreds of forwards on one domain but only about
10 pop3's, so the index is in the wrong place for me. :-)
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 7:17 PM
> To: Svyatoslav Trukhanov
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Feature request
>
>
> define what you mean pattern - a reg exp - not really possible
define what you mean pattern - a reg exp - not really possible to do in
mysql i believe (though i could be wrong) - just look for a string? -
definatley easy to do then
Eric
-- Support your government, give Echelon / Carnivore something to parse --
classfield top-secret government restricted
I look to code of qmailadmin, part when it find user.
I think feature vauth_find(char *pattern, int start, int sort), which work
such as
vauth_getall, but return only records, that match pattern.
Who what say about this?
I haven't figured out how to modify the makefiles for that.
the vmkpasswd program is only available for the cdb module.
Edit the Makefile and delete the reference to vmkpasswd
That will allow the make file to finish
Ken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `
Hi Ken,
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/vpopmail-4.9.4'
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o vmkpasswd vmkpasswd.o libvpopmail.a
-L/usr/local/lib -ll
dap -llber -lnsl -lcrypt
vmkpasswd.o: In function `main':
/usr/local/src/vpopmail-4.9.4/vmkpasswd.c:64: undefined reference to
`vmkpasswd'
collect
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
H... From field look strange.
> Of Ken Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:39 AM
> To: Svyatoslav Trukhanov
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Feature reque
Svyatoslav Trukhanov wrote:
>
> I have large mail system, use qmail+vpopmail+MySQL
>
> All is Ok, but
> when new mail for user arrived vdelivermail connect to MySQL and get home
> dir
> for this user. I think this is bottleneck on my system. (MySQL located not
> on the same machine, when mailbox
I have large mail system, use qmail+vpopmail+MySQL
All is Ok, but
when new mail for user arrived vdelivermail connect to MySQL and get home
dir
for this user. I think this is bottleneck on my system. (MySQL located not
on the same machine, when mailboxes).
I think maybe this features will be us
Done
ChangeLog
Sep 6 - vadddomain prints out usage statement if no domain is specified
Bill Shupp wrote:
>
> Also, it would be cool if vadddomain would print usage syntax if no arguments
> are supplied. Currently, it tried to add an unspecified domain.
>
> -Bill Shupp
>
> Quoting Johan Alm
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
