t find the
>>>>>> difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
>>>>>> amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
>>>>>> multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no
>>&g
way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure
out what is really happening?
RM> You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything
RM> that happens within an smtp conversation.
RM> http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/recordio.html
Thank you for your assistance, Rick. I
Hi,
On 27.07.2011 at 00:56 a...@ltmd.org wrote:
>
> Just want to add that I tested right now and found that the same fresh
> programs configurations and settings on the clean 32-bit system
> working pretty good. Should I try once again to use recordio program
> on a 64-bit system?
'recordio' onl
>>>> User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
>>>>> difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
>>>>> amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
>>>>> multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpo
> difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
>>>> amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
>>>> multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no
>>>> success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain
multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no
success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure
out what is really happening?
RM> You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything
RM> that happens within an smtp conver
reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no
>> success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure
>> out what is really happening?
RM> You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything
RM> that happens within an smtp
success. :( Is there some way to debug that plain SMTP-AUTH to figure
out what is really happening?
Hi,
You can use recordio (part of one of djb's packages) to log everything
that happens within an smtp conversation.
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/recordio.html
ie
/service/qmail-smtpd/run
#
Hello Rick,
Friday, July 1, 2011, 16:13:45, Rick Macdougall wrote:
RM> On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
>> I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
>> 64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
>> blocked me.
>
On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
blocked me.
Right now I have no multilib 64-bit hardened Gentoo system with
netqmail-1.06, vpopmail-5.4.30-r2, dovecot
I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
blocked me.
Right now I have no multilib 64-bit hardened Gentoo system with
netqmail-1.06, vpopmail-5.4.30-r2, dovecot-2.0.13 and some other
stuff. Everything seems
Grazie Remo,
anyway I managed to find here http://surbl.freeapp.net/qmail/011_surbl
the patch that I was looking for. It's already embedded into my package.
On next days I'll do more tests.
regards
Roberto
On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:56:52 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
Sorry one more
http://riemann
Sorry one more
http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/programs/qmail-rbl.c
Remo
On 5/4/11 1:40 PM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
>> (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?).
>
>
Here is anther link
http://riemann.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/programs/rblsmtpd-timeout.tar.gz
Bye,
Remo
On 5/4/11 1:40 PM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
>> (does this patch have the rbl patch in
Here you can get mine
http://italy1.com/ucspi-tcp-0.88.nodefaultrbl.patch
Ciao
Remo
On 5/4/11 1:40 PM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
>> (does this patch have the rbl patch installed as w
On Wed, 04 May 2011 08:35:10 -0600, Remo Mattei wrote:
Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
(does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?).
Ciao Remo,
the link to the surbl patch is still broken for months
http://www.surbl.org/qmail/011_surbl
I would be glad if someone ca
Ciao Roberto, ma questo patch nn ha rbl pacciato?
(does this patch have the rbl patch installed as well?).
Remo
On 5/4/11 5:14 AM, "Roberto Puzzanghera" wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the
> latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Ho
Hi,
Yes , I using qmail-1.03 ...
I testing manual applying chkuser patch ...
Thanks !
-Message d'origine-
De : Roberto Puzzanghera [mailto:ad...@sagredo.eu]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2011 14:44
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : RE: [vchkpw] Qmail + chkuser + smtp-auth
Hi,
my packag
Hi,
my package was tested for netqmail-1.06. I think you are using
qmail-1.03
regards
Roberto
On Wed, 4 May 2011 14:32:17 +0200, OVH wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your patch, but it shows errors, so if you have only
the patch
with smtp-auth and chkuser i like it.
Thanks!
patching file
Hi,
Thank you for your patch, but it shows errors, so if you have only the patch
with smtp-auth and chkuser i like it.
Thanks!
patching file FILES
Hunk #1 succeeded at 135 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 337 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 406 (offset -1 lines).
patching file
Hi,
I have a patch here http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/82 including the
latest versions of smtp-auth by E.Hoffmann, smtp-tls by F.Vermulen and
chkuser.
I can put together a package with just smtp-auth and chkuser if you
like.. Anyway you can do it by yourself applying chkuser over smtp-tls
and
Hi,
On my Qmail 1.03 I can not simultaneously apply smtp-auth patch
(qmail-smtpd-auth-0510) and chkuser (chkuser-2.0.8b-release or
chkuser-2.0.9-release).
It seems that there is a conflict between these two patches. you know a
patch which includes 2 or a solution to the conflict ?
Thanks
have looked at
SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will work with vpopmail.
It works. Just be sure that you have clear passwords enabled in
vpopmail if you want to support CRAM-MD5 authentication.
Quoting Davis Sylvester :
Matt what smtp-patch do u suggest! Can u point me to a current howto?
After re
can't.
This was just discussed on the list yesterday. Dovecot caches user
information in memory and does not support roaming users. You will
need to switch to SMTP authentication.
POP-before-SMTP is *bad*.
Is there a simple resolution to resolve this issue? I have looked at
SMTP-AUTH bu
s was just discussed on the list yesterday. Dovecot caches user
information in memory and does not support roaming users. You will
need to switch to SMTP authentication.
POP-before-SMTP is *bad*.
Is there a simple resolution to resolve this issue? I have looked at
SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will
r
>information in memory and does not support roaming users. You will
>need to switch to SMTP authentication.
>
>POP-before-SMTP is *bad*.
>
>> Is there a simple resolution to resolve this issue? I have looked at
>> SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will work with vpopmail.
>
Thanks Matt. Sorry about not seeing previous post. I worked on this over
the weekend and just got around to sending out request for help.
!DSPAM:4c8a701d32711706316047!
yes you should use smtp-auth that's what I use and I have had this for
over 5 years now..
Works all over the world as long as the internet connection does not
block port 25 hehe, which then I create an iptables rule where using an
upper port goes to the qmail server port 25 and I can
resolve this issue? I have looked at
> SMTP-AUTH but not sure it will work with vpopmail.
It works. Just be sure that you have clear passwords enabled in
vpopmail if you want to support CRAM-MD5 authentication.
- --
/*
Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer
I am using Qmail and Dovecot for IMAP. Prior to installing Dovecot we only
offered POP3 and SMTP services.
The issue I have run into is that after I installed Dovecot, IMAP runs fine,
but when my users go to send email they can't.
We are using POP-before-SMTP for SMTP auth. Since there
On 06/29/2010 03:00 AM, stea...@neotech-hk.com wrote:
Dear Juraj Hantak
technicky riaditel
This user has been banned from the list.
/me face palms
The level of cluelessness in HK is just incredible. No doubt thanks to
the dumb efforts of this lot:
http://www.antispam.gov.hk/english/ma
Thanks..
On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/29/2010 03:00 AM, stea...@neotech-hk.com wrote:
>> Dear Juraj Hantak
>> technicky riaditel
>
> This user has been banned from the list.
> - --
> /*
>Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/2010 03:00 AM, stea...@neotech-hk.com wrote:
> Dear Juraj Hantak
> technicky riaditel
This user has been banned from the list.
- --
/*
Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technici
--
From: "Juraj Hantak"
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:44 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and smtp auth
Hi,
You can try to use:
http://www.spamdyke.org/
--
S pozdravom / best regards
Juraj Hantak
technicky riaditel
--
WEBGLOBE, s.r.o.
Stara Prievozska
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 06:43 AM, Den Arion wrote:
I was looking for a version or patch to work with authentication with
vpopmail. Almost all patches I found need additional software that it’s
not available..
Does somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail users
authentication
somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail users
authentication? If yes just check if additional software needed is
available.
Hi,
See http://www.shupp.org/toaster/
Regards,
Rick
!DSPAM:4c2996f332711670912643!
On 28/06/2010 6:43 PM, Den Arion wrote:
I was looking for a version or patch to work with authentication with
vpopmail. Almost all patches I found need additional software that
it’s not available..
Does somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail users
authentication? If yes
I was looking for a version or patch to work with
authentication with vpopmail. Almost all patches I found need additional
software that it’s not available..
Does somebody in the list have running smtp auth with vpopmail
users authentication? If yes just check if additional software needed is
Hello,
As Endersys, we released two patches for qmail.
1) qmail canonicalised recipient logging and more patch:
http://blog.endersys.com/2009/12/qmail-canonicalised-recipient-logging-and-more-patch/
2) qmail from address and SMTP-AUTH username check patch
http://blog.endersys.com/2009/12/qmail
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Christopher Chan ha scritto:
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hello,
this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that
works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP.
Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL
Christopher Chan ha scritto:
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hello,
this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that
works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP.
Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL
that query the vpopmail
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hello,
this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that
works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP.
Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL that
query the vpopmail DB for user authentication
Hello,
this is my situation, one qmail+vpopmail(MySQL)+dovecot server that
works like an MX record and provide access on mailbox via POP3 or IMAP.
Another server with postfix and SASL for SMTP-Auth only, with SASL that
query the vpopmail DB for user authentication.
My intention is to set a
Sigh-
this is a shame - it doesn't work. still getting smtp auth issues with
fehcom's auth. So i've given up on it for now it works now, but
now simscan messages are bled in:
simscan:[17008]:PASSTHRU (7.70/5.00):2.6977s:[SPAM] :93.89.85.51:ja...@imaj.es
:ima...@
n
>> export NOP0FCHECK=1
>> export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
>>
>>
>> Just my 2 cents..
>> Remo
>>
>> On 6/11/09 8:44 AM, "James Cox" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I just did a fresh install of toaster.
>>>
>>> i
Brian Lanier ha scritto:
- Original Message -
*From:* James Cox <mailto:ja...@imaj.es>
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com <mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com>
*Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
*Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fres
mscan
export NOP0FCHECK=1
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
Just my 2 cents..
Remo
On 6/11/09 8:44 AM, "James Cox" wrote:
I just did a fresh install of toaster.
i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
conflating the first portion of domain, so if for example i have
- Original Message -
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fresh install of toaster.
i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
conf
James Cox" wrote:
> I just did a fresh install of toaster.
>
> i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
> conflating the first portion of domain, so if for example i have the
> user f...@example.com, it tries to auth foo.com@:myip
>
> huh
I just did a fresh install of toaster.
i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
conflating the first portion of domain, so if for example i have the
user f...@example.com, it tries to auth foo.com@:myip
huh??
-james
On 11 Jun 2009, at 13:51, Tren Blackburn
track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Pa
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if
it is worth using 1.0.6.
Weird, i installed the patch with Er
Thank you James, grazie Tonino.
!DSPAM:4a30ba6832669637967409!
is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if it
is worth using 1.0.6.
Weird, i installed the patch with Erwin's smtp-auth, and have ended up
with failed auths:
Jun 10
other auth patches complained. They
passed to the one contained in Shupp's Toaster (the unique one I've
checked) and all problems went away.
As alternative, should try to disable logs.
So, versions-
I've got
- netqmail 1.06
- smtp auth 1.03 from http://members.elysium.pl/brush/q
with other auth patches complained. They
passed to the one contained in Shupp's Toaster (the unique one I've
checked) and all problems went away.
As alternative, should try to disable logs.
So, versions-
I've got
- netqmail 1.06
- smtp auth 1.03 from http://members.elysium.pl/br
complained. They
passed to the one contained in Shupp's Toaster (the unique one I've
checked) and all problems went away.
As alternative, should try to disable logs.
So, versions-
I've got
- netqmail 1.06
- smtp auth 1.03 from http://members.elysium.pl/brush/q
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER r
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are enabled.
version 2.0.9 for me.
What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ?
I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem you
are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn&#
Here is mine you can try to use my settings..
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export NOP0FCHECK=1
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2200 \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
> yeah, i saw that patch. but i am using the current version (i think?) 0.31
I'm not really sure *why* it would be happening and I don't really have a
solution
to pose to you. I just wanted you to be aware that the output you were s
I used Bill's and works fine. I do have chkuser installed on mine with smtp
auth.
Remo
On 6/10/09 9:25 AM, "Rick Macdougall" wrote:
> James Cox wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>>
>>> James Cox wrote:
>>&g
rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are enabled.
version 2.0.9 for me.
What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ?
I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem you
are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn't been seen in ye
KUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are enabled.
version 2.0.9 for me.
What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ?
I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem
you are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn't been seen in years.
Rick:
yeah,
er of those two are enabled.
version 2.0.9 for me.
What version of SMTP AUTH are you using ?
I know there is a version out there that causes the exact problem you
are seeing, although to my knowledge it hasn't been seen in years.
Regards,
Rick
!DSPAM:4a2fb48732661746112274!
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are enabl
Hi James,
What version of chkuser are you using?
When I look at the 2.0.9 source, I see the following lines inside
chkuser_settings.h:
/*
* the following line enables debugging of chkuser
*/
/* #define CHKUSER_DEBUG */
/*
* The following line moves DEBUG output from STDOUT (default) to ST
hey Harm,
Here's the run file for the log -
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
s250 n 10 /var/log/qmail/smtpd
and yeah- i figured that i'm pushing to stdout... which i expect the
log/run should catch via the multilog. therefore i'm a bit confused as
to how
Hi James,
You are copying stderr (file descriptor 2) to your stdout (that's what
the terminating 2>&1 is for). However, this log is only saved if
multilog is indeed catching it.
Find in the directory where this `run' file was located the directory
`log', and publish the content of the `run'
On 9 Jun 2009, at 18:16, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been
looking
at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
> Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been looking
> at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
> immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced that these lines should ever
> exist in the smtp
Hey,
Here's an (edited) example of a smtp conversation, with a netqmail
install with smtp auth and chkuser patches:
220 mail.23i.net ESMTP
EHLO imaj.es
250-mail.23i.net
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
AUTH LOGIN
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 14:08 +0200, Optima (Justin Broton) wrote:
> :allow,SMTPAUTH=""
Hi List,
what about :allow,SMTPAUTH="" , if i set this parameter in tcp.smtp
file , will it make mandatory/Must for others to User SMTP AUTH.
/\
Tarak
!DSPAM:47f49a73120505832912682!
t; remo
>
> Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
> >> Relaying is usually controlled by the tcp.smtp file using the
> >> RELAYCLIENT variable.
> >>
> >> To only allow localhost to relay and require all other IPs to
> >> use smtp auth you could put this one lin
then use the relayclient it works fine like this format
ipaddress:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
you are set
remo
Marcin Soltysiak wrote:
Relaying is usually controlled by the tcp.smtp file using the
RELAYCLIENT variable.
To only allow localhost to relay and require all other IPs to
use smt
Relaying is usually controlled by the tcp.smtp file using the RELAYCLIENT
variable.
To only allow localhost to relay and require all other IPs to
use smtp auth you could put this one line in your tcp.smtp file
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Then rebuild your tcp.smtp.cdb file usin
: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Only Allowing SMTP AUTH
Optima (Justin Broton) wrote:
Hi All,
I installed Qmail and add-ons like qmail1.03, vpopmail qmailadmin via
lazy dog installer scripts from www.lazyinstaller.net which worked a
treat.
The problem is now our requirem
Many thanks.
Worked a treat, now all I need to do is advise the hundred clients or so
lol.
Thanks again.
Justin.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Only Allowing SMTP AUTH
Optima (Justin Broton) wrote:
Hi All,
I installed Qmail and add-ons like qmail1.03, vpopmail qmailadmin via lazy dog
installer scripts from www.lazyinstaller.net which worked a treat.
The problem is now our requirements are to ONLY allow SMTP AUTH and localhost
ONLY and no other relaying or
Hi All,
I installed Qmail and add-ons like qmail1.03, vpopmail qmailadmin via lazy dog
installer scripts from www.lazyinstaller.net which worked a treat.
The problem is now our requirements are to ONLY allow SMTP AUTH and localhost
ONLY and no other relaying or unauthorised sending of email to
SMTP auth works fine
- outbound mail with auth leads basically to some messed up pipes or
file descriptors whatever, look at this:
ehlo ()
250-www.happyserverfriends.info
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
AUTH PLAIN (xx)
235 ok, go
http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined.shtml
Try the patch there. And take this up with Mr. Simpson if you have
problems with his patch (you should not)
!DSPAM:47a1341c310546330020416!
Hi folks,
after rather long but then successul compile marathon I finally habe
everything in place...but...
- inbound mail without SMTP auth works fine
- outbound mail with auth leads basically to some messed up pipes or
file descriptors whatever, look at this:
ehlo ()
250
Thanks for the info.
Trey Nolen
- Original Message -
From: "John Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd
for
authenticated users.
Port 587, is the default port for this kind of operation.
Thanks. We will start that, too. But, we do have a number of
clients that are ALREADY using port 25 for smtp-auth. Is there any
way to keep them from being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance,
is
On 8/17/2007 9:13 PM, Trey Nolen wrote:
being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance, is there a way to pass a
variable to tcpserver if the connection is authenticated via smtp-auth?
Not without patching. the process goes like this:
user -> tcpserver -> rblsmtpd -> qmail-smtpd (with
default port for this kind of operation.
Thanks. We will start that, too. But, we do have a number of clients that
are ALREADY using port 25 for smtp-auth. Is there any way to keep them from
being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance, is there a way to pass a
variable to tcpserver if the
Trey Nolen wrote:
We have been using smtp-after-pop for a long time, but are also using
smtp-auth for some purposes. When users authenticate via POP, a line
like the following gets added to open-smtp:
ww.xx.yy.zz:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",WHITELIST=""
We have been using smtp-after-pop for a long time, but are also using
smtp-auth for some purposes. When users authenticate via POP, a line like
the following gets added to open-smtp:
ww.xx.yy.zz:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",WHITELIST="" 1187395788
T
DAve wrote:
A quick check of using Perl to auth against a vpopmaild instance works
just dandy. I hacked up a copy of the generic checkpassword.pl script
from qmail.org and had it working pretty quickly. It took longer to
upgrade my test server and get vpopmaild working.
Cool!
But what i
DAve wrote:
Rick Widmer wrote:
DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
DAve,
I think you've found a bug in vchkpw.
Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head,
again, I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was
never intended to do.
>> I thi
Rick Widmer wrote:
DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
DAve,
I think you've found a bug in vchkpw.
Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head,
again, I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was
never intended to do.
>> I think... that vc
Rick Widmer wrote:
Let me know if that works, and I'll make changes to the release
version. That code could probably be permanently removed -- the
user's directory is created by vdelivermail when necessary. vchkpw
doesn't need to be doing it.
Bill: I have to disagree. The authentication
DAve wrote:
DAve wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
DAve,
I think you've found a bug in vchkpw.
Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again,
I more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never
intended to do.
>> I think... that vchkpw will not work wi
DAve wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
DAve,
I think you've found a bug in vchkpw.
Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again, I
more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never
intended to do.
In a nutshell I am trying to use vchkpw as an auth tool onl
Tom Collins wrote:
DAve,
I think you've found a bug in vchkpw.
Bug? After running this entire situation through my thick head, again, I
more suspect I am trying to do something with vchkpw it was never
intended to do.
In a nutshell I am trying to use vchkpw as an auth tool only, and
nothi
DAve,
I think you've found a bug in vchkpw.
For some reason, it wants to create the user's directory if it
doesn't already exist. This could be related to updating the
lastauth file in the user's directory. Disabling AUTH_LOGGING on
that system will help, but you'll still have code tryin
Rick Romero wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:55 -0500, DAve wrote:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
DAve wrote:
Good morning,
No errors when building, seems to work,
bash-2.05b# /home/vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error. Domain pixelhammer.com was not found in the assign file
That should not
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:55 -0500, DAve wrote:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
> > DAve wrote:
> >> Good morning,
> >>
> >> No errors when building, seems to work,
> >> bash-2.05b# /home/vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Error. Domain pixelhammer.com was not found in the assign file
> >
> >
>
1 - 100 of 716 matches
Mail list logo
