[vchkpw] netqmail/vpopmail/chkuser : not allowed to relay

hi, i have made a fresh install of netqmail-1.06 / vpopmail-5.4.17 and used chkuser 2.0.9. But when i try to send emails to a domain wich is not local, i have le message "sorry, this domain is not in my list of allowed rcphosts". So, i have tried with older version (wich is working on anothe

Re: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3

built with roaming users support. > > -- > Ed McLain > > > > From: Remo Mattei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:54:59 -0600 > To: > Conversation: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3 >

Re: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3

ei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:54:59 -0600 To: Conversation: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3 Subject: Re: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3 yes that's correct. Thanks Ed McLain wrote: > Are you referring to using dovecot with imap and vpopmail

Re: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3

_ > From: Remo Mattei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:48:29 -0600 > To: > Conversation: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3 > Subject: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3 > > Hello I have done some testing and

Re: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3

c 2007 11:48:29 -0600 To: Conversation: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3 Subject: [vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3 Hello I have done some testing and dovecot works great. However the scenario below show that it does not update the info and does not allow me to send mail if the address

[vchkpw] dovecot relay compare to pop3

Hello I have done some testing and dovecot works great. However the scenario below show that it does not update the info and does not allow me to send mail if the address is in the mail-abuse list. Trying to send mail using imap with dovecot from comcast which does have a address in the blacklist

Re: [vchkpw] relay server

hi, > Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using > vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I add > the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an smtproutes line > (in this control file) as domain.com:mail.domain.com bu

Re: [vchkpw] relay server

On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:15:53 -0500 Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, if the domain is in /v/q/c/virtualdomains then the smtproutes > file will not be looked at. My mistake -- The cup and string to the moon pop is spiking because of TK421 not being at his post. Verio is playing NF

Re: [vchkpw] relay server

ed wrote: In order to accept the mail, the domains in question should exist in: /v/q/c/virtualdomains /v/q/c/rcpthosts Then the domains should also exist in /v/q/u/assign Which should also be compiled to a cdb /v/q/u/cdb (check that the two have similar information) Then you shou

Re: [vchkpw] relay server

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I add the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an smtproutes line (in this control file) as domain.com:mail.domain.co

Re: [vchkpw] relay server

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:58:43 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using > vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I > add the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an > smtprou

[vchkpw] relay server

Hi I wanted to setup a scanning relay server.. I explain I'm using vpopmail 5.4.13 and qmail-1.03 with john simpson 7 combined patch I add the domains with ./vadddomain domain.com and later add an smtproutes line (in this control file) as domain.com:mail.domain.com but the mail always is tr

[vchkpw] Re: Vpopmail/QMail relay local mail to another server mail ??

Hi, ,- - [ Le lundi 25 juin 2007 vers 10:12 Hoang An écrivait: ] - - | > Currently, I had a Qmail Server in Fedora 4 and MDeaemon in Windows 2003. > But when user1 send to user3, QMail return error ->> > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mydomain.com . > I'm afraid I wasn'

[vchkpw] Re: Vpopmail/QMail relay local mail to another server mail ??

ldomains -> mydomain.com:mydomain.com I still have problem with Vpopmail/QMail relay local mail to another server mail. Thanks, On 6/25/07, Hoang An <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently, I had a Qmail Server in Fedora 4 and MDeaemon in Windows 2003. In MDaemon, I store all email acount in my network. Now

[vchkpw] Vpopmail/QMail relay local mail to another server mail ??

n vpopmail they would return error. I want Qmail continue send email (after QMail can not find account in it's loccal) to MDaemon so user3 can receives. I also configure file smptroute for QMail relay to MDaemon successful. Mail account in QMail can relay to MDaemon for internet mail. The

Re: [vchkpw] which files truly determine "relay" into a qmail server

Q: ONLY the content of the 'rcpthosts' and 'morercpthosts' (and any special cases in tcp.smtp) defines which domains' incoming mail will be accepted by SMTPd. True or False? FALSE: The contents of rcpthosts and morercpthosts define which domains mail is accepted by SMTP for [that part is righ

Re: [vchkpw] which files truly determine "relay" into a qmail server

s, or if you have a smarthost. For domains that your mail server will accept mail from the Internet, see `cat rcpthosts morercpthosts`. -M - Original Message From: Dave Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:39:27 AM Subject

Re: [vchkpw] which files truly determine "relay" into a qmail server

erver will accept mail from the Internet, see `cat rcpthosts morercpthosts`. -M - Original Message From: Dave Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:39:27 AM Subject: [vchkpw] which files truly determine "relay" into a qm

[vchkpw] which files truly determine "relay" into a qmail server

; and 'morerctphosts' govern which domains the server will accept delivery/relay for from the outside. Thus, I felt that if I built a master list from these two files, any other domains I might find are automatically "unused". However this install has a number of domains tha

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

or BeOS ? ;) As qmail server is used as front-relay , there is problem with chkuser to check real rcpt. from discussion I see few aproaches how it can be done: - copy/mount vpopmail (not all files, just needed) to relay server and delete from virtualdomains - well, kinda ugly but working ;) probl

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

but just chkuser style functionality), and the client communicates with this server to validate destination addresses. The client is called using a qmail-check-recipient patch (not sure where it came from, I might have even written it). It may be possible to write the server to use chkuser and have clients on the relay machines.

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

Miki wrote: - so after spending weekend over google ;) I want kindly ask TONIX if he is willing to add smal feature into chkuser 2.0.8, I have idea something like CHECK_EXTERNAL_FILE = 0/1 EXTERNAL_FILE = /bla/bla/list.txt (or even cdb) I second this request-- having this functionality in chkus

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

/2 or BeOS ? ;) As qmail server is used as front-relay , there is problem with chkuser to check real rcpt. from discussion I see few aproaches how it can be done: - copy/mount vpopmail (not all files, just needed) to relay server and delete from virtualdomains - well, kinda ugly but working ;

[vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

se, which is not good as qmail, but these days is almost everything good as qmail. If there is no progress,blind by own feeling how it is perfect , no matter that it is "best of the best" it will become soon or later overcome by others. Remember OS/2 or BeOS ? ;) As qmail server is use

[vchkpw] roaming user relay problem, no relay in /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb file

hi, i installed vpopmail with roaming user and with mysql support correctly. but i have a problem about relaying pop3 users.. when pop3 used remote ip address is added to relay table on mysql.. but i cant see ip address on cdb file.. i checked tcp.smtp.cdb file with cdbdump .. smtp run file

[vchkpw] onauth Roadmap (WAS: Local relay patch)

the existing code that gets defined if POP_AUTH_OPEN_RELAY is defined using the new API, but link against the existing code in libvpopmail.a for now. Change vchkpw to call the onauth API and document that the new program should be used as the onauth program to duplicate existing functionality. Dep

Re: [vchkpw] Local relay patch

John Simpson wrote: you're right, the "onauth" code itself is simple- i could probably write it in about fifteen minutes, and i'm sure several other people could as well. yeah, vi vpopmail.c duplicate the existing call_onchange function s/change/auth/g s/CHANGE/AUTH/g then... grep PO

Re: [vchkpw] Local relay patch

On 2007-01-06, at 1310, Joshua Megerman wrote: On Saturday 06 January 2007 12:56, John Simpson wrote: joshua? if we add an "onauth" hook, how long would it take you to duplicate what vpopmail already does, using external scripts? i'm thinking maybe a set of files in a subdirectory under "contri

Re: [vchkpw] Local relay patch

On Saturday 06 January 2007 12:56, John Simpson wrote: > On 2007-01-06, at 0648, Rick Widmer wrote: > > John Simpson wrote: > > > and it also means that vpopmail itself will never have to worry > > > > about > > > > > relay-after-pop3 issues again- th

Re: [vchkpw] Local relay patch

On 2007-01-06, at 0648, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: > and it also means that vpopmail itself will never have to worry about > relay-after-pop3 issues again- they can be referred to whoever wrote > the external scripts that they will be using. I don't agree about thi

[vchkpw] Local relay patch

John Simpson wrote: > i think the idea of an "onauth" hook, similar to how "onchange" > works, will minimize the amount of code changes needed for > vpopmail, while opening the door for somebody (like joshua) to > write a relay-after-pop3/imap system as external

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser - on relay server

Szeki - Inc wrote: I have a relay server, and have a backend with vpopmail, another with sendmail (old install), and some other (inlcuding winfs szerver too). I want to use chkuser to check the recipient from a combined list, or cdb, or sql storage, to allow only valid recipients to the backend

Re: [vchkpw] Chkuser - on relay server

John Simpson recently posted his patch that parallels conceptual functionality from CHKUSER but separates depedencies as I read it. Might be a fit, haven't tried it... http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtm Szeki - Inc wrote: I have a relay server, and have a backend

[vchkpw] Chkuser - on relay server

I have a relay server, and have a backend with vpopmail, another with sendmail (old install), and some other (inlcuding winfs szerver too). I want to use chkuser to check the recipient from a combined list, or cdb, or sql storage, to allow only valid recipients to the backend servers. (so they

Re: [vchkpw] cannt relay

Cristi Tauber wrote: Ken Jones wrote: Cristi Tauber wrote: hello there, i installed qmail + vpopmail + mysql on debian . i configured vpopmail to allow roaming users (pop before smtp). if i get messages my ip goes to relay table in vpopmail mysql database , but i cannot relay. i mean

Re: [vchkpw] cannt relay

Ken Jones wrote: Cristi Tauber wrote: hello there, i installed qmail + vpopmail + mysql on debian . i configured vpopmail to allow roaming users (pop before smtp). if i get messages my ip goes to relay table in vpopmail mysql database , but i cannot relay. i mean : the ip is written in the

Re: [vchkpw] cannt relay

Cristi Tauber wrote: hello there, i installed qmail + vpopmail + mysql on debian . i configured vpopmail to allow roaming users (pop before smtp). if i get messages my ip goes to relay table in vpopmail mysql database , but i cannot relay. i mean : the ip is written in the table but when i

[vchkpw] cannt relay

hello there, i installed qmail + vpopmail + mysql on debian . i configured vpopmail to allow roaming users (pop before smtp). if i get messages my ip goes to relay table in vpopmail mysql database , but i cannot relay. i mean : the ip is written in the table but when i send mail it says

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

8 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop At 02:02 PM 3/24/2006, you wrote: On Friday 24 March 2006 12:39, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > At 11:47 AM 3/24/2006, Michael Krieger wrote: > unless you're doing it in mysql. which works dandy. or with Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl pa

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

At 02:02 PM 3/24/2006, you wrote: On Friday 24 March 2006 12:39, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > At 11:47 AM 3/24/2006, Michael Krieger wrote: > unless you're doing it in mysql. which works dandy. or with Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl package, which doesn't involve any ove

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

. > > unless you're doing it in mysql. which works dandy. or with Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl package, which doesn't involve any overly-specific hacks to tcpserver. http://untroubled.org/relay-ctrl -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the beginnin

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

no, no cdb rebuilding at all. this is with the patches to do so of course. my vpopmail tcp.smtp.cdb file hasn't been touched in just over three years. Good to know- thanks for the correction.of course, i have lots more mysql transactions going on all the time, but have had no performance

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

At 01:05 PM 3/24/2006, you wrote: unless you're doing it in mysql. which works dandy. You sure about that? the MySQL open relay database would speed up the cleanup of old entries and the updates making that pretty quick, but ultimately it needs to make that a cdb file that sets relayc

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

unless you're doing it in mysql. which works dandy.You sure about that?the MySQL open relay database would speed up the cleanup of old entries and the updates making that pretty quick, but ultimately it needs to make that a cdb file that sets relayclient for tcpserver to execute qmail-

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

At 11:47 AM 3/24/2006, Michael Krieger wrote: To correct myself... Each future POP authentication will update the expire time of the open-smtp entry and rebuild the CDB file again. I don't believe it actually rebuilds the CDB file here, but it does update the open-smtp file with the new timest

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

On Friday 24 March 2006 11:36, David Chaplin-Loebell wrote: > Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > >On Friday 24 March 2006 10:31, Michael Krieger wrote: > >>SMTP Authentication seems to be the norm these days, and I'd encourage > >> it. Now if only M$ would make it the default or easier than going into > >>

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

To correct myself... Each future POP authentication will update the expire time of the open-smtp entry and rebuild the CDB file again.I don't believe it actually rebuilds the CDB file here, but it does update the open-smtp file with the new timestamp for the expiry.  In any case, any chang

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

I have my clients use port 587 whenever possible, because I use RBLs on port 25 that block some dynamic address ranges.Is there a better practice for this?I'd also recommend turning of hostname lookups and identd lookups in tcpserver's command line.You may want to look at the REQUIREAUTH patch

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

ext, based on my observations.  Even better, many (especially newer ones) tend to use challenge/response algorithms for SMTP-Auth for example, which ensure one-time use, and prevent creating an open relay if the connection is viewed.Now, I'd also argue (unrelated to my previous e-mail

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Friday 24 March 2006 10:31, Michael Krieger wrote: SMTP Authentication seems to be the norm these days, and I'd encourage it. Now if only M$ would make it the default or easier than going into advanced settings when adding an account (and also the port 587 option)

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

At 11:04 AM 3/24/2006, you wrote: I know that it was broken on one of our mail servers a few years ago (where it advertised it but then didn't authenticate properly) and we got <10% of users properly authenticating and >90% of them not (these are if I recall correctly and are of course rough

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

I know that it was broken on one of our mail servers a few years ago (where it advertised it but then didn't authenticate properly) and we got <10% of users properly authenticating and >90% of them not (these are if I recall correctly and are of course rough numbers.  The general observation I

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

At 10:48 AM 3/24/2006, Michael Krieger wrote: Keeping in mind most SMTP uses CRAM-MD5 or some equivalent these days with some portion of challenge/response from the server for authentication details... this of course happens automatically. do you have a source for the claim of 'most'? just c

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

Keeping in mind most SMTP uses CRAM-MD5 or some equivalent these days with some portion of challenge/response from the server for authentication details... this of course happens automatically.Some e-mail clients will go kicking and screaming on self-signed certificates, particularly in a vi

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

On Friday 24 March 2006 10:31, Michael Krieger wrote: > SMTP Authentication seems to be the norm these days, and I'd encourage it. > Now if only M$ would make it the default or easier than going into > advanced settings when adding an account (and also the port 587 option). why use port 587?

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

SMTP Authentication seems to be the norm these days, and I'd encourage it.  Now if only M$ would make it the default or easier than going into advanced settings when adding an account (and also the port 587 option).-M Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 24 March 2006 09:52,

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

On Friday 24 March 2006 09:52, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > If it doesn't, just tell your users to make sure if they see it happen to > hit send/receive and try again. Or switch to an smtp auth based solution > if it's that big of a problem. wow, I can't believe I didn't mention this before: a third o

Re: [vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

On Friday 24 March 2006 07:59, Andrew Simon wrote: > I am running qmail/courier-map/vpopmail 5.4.2 system. It is working well. > However occassionally users get the > > "553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)" > > Its not all the time. They are outside the office when

[vchkpw] relay, smtp after pop

I am running qmail/courier-map/vpopmail 5.4.2 system. It is working well. However occassionally users get the   "553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)"   Its not all the time. They are outside the office when this happens. I am using smtp after pop. All the s

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail returns "relay denied" for non vpopmail virtual domain

On Monday 19 September 2005 04:00 am, Nick Gilbert wrote: > > Perhaps you need to recompile vpopmail with the "--enable-passwd" > > configure option ? > > > > Michael. > > I've just tried that and it doesn't seem to have made a difference. I >

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail returns "relay denied" for non vpopmail virtual domain RESOLVED

Fixed! I have no idea why, but somehow Exim had jumped on to my box. I certainly haven't installed manually but perhaps something had it as a dependancy when I installed something else or maybe did a "yum update". Anyway - now that I've uninstalled Exim, everything is working OK. No wonder my qma

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail returns "relay denied" for non vpopmail virtual domain

> Shouldnt it be rcpthosts and locals > > Not rcpthosts and virtualdomains What are "locals"? Previously I've just added the domain to rcpthosts and added an entry like domain.com:nick-domaincom to virtualdomains. Then in my home directory /home/nick, I create a .qmail-domaincom-default and then

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail returns "relay denied" for non vpopmail virtual domain

- Original Message - From: "Nick Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For some reason, if I try and send mail to this domain, I get a 500 relay denied error, even though the domain has been added to rcpthosts and virtualdomains. Oh Yeah Shouldnt it be rcpthosts

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail returns "relay denied" for non vpopmail virtual domain

> Perhaps you need to recompile vpopmail with the "--enable-passwd" > configure option ? > > Michael. I've just tried that and it doesn't seem to have made a difference. I still get "550 relay not permitted". :( Nick...

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail returns "relay denied" for non vpopmail virtual domain

For some reason, if I try and send mail to this domain, I get a 500 relay denied error, even though the domain has been added to rcpthosts and virtualdomains. Perhaps you need to recompile vpopmail with the "--enable-passwd" configure option ? Michael.

[vchkpw] Qmail returns "relay denied" for non vpopmail virtual domain

Hi, I built a Qmail box following Bill Schupp's instructions on the web. For various reasons I then needed to add a "normal" qmail domain for a normal local shell account (ie, not via vpopmail). For some reason, if I try and send mail to this domain, I get a 500 relay denied err

[vchkpw] Re: headers question OPEN RELAY

quot; -o -z "$LOCAL" ]; then echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, MAXSMTPD, or LOCAL is unset in echo /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run exit 1 fi if [ ! -f /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts ]; then echo "No /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts!" echo "Refusing to start SMTP list

Re: [vchkpw] Disable local relay

yes it's possible by using empf more information can be found here http://www.inter7.com/?page=empf     - Original Message - From: michele To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 1:47 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Disable local relay Hi, it's poss

RE: [vchkpw] Disable local relay

g our server as smtp > > server, it does allow relay: there is a way to prevent this? > > Thanks > > That isn't relay -- your server is the final destination for > domain.com so it won't relay it to another server. > > What are you trying to accomplish? Y

Re: [vchkpw] Disable local relay

On Jul 7, 2005, at 10:47 AM, michele wrote: Hi, it's possible to disable relaying for local domains? Our server host mail for domain.com; if i try to send a message from another computer to [EMAIL PROTECTED], using our server as smtp server, it does allow relay: there is a way to prevent

[vchkpw] Disable local relay

Hi, it's possible to disable relaying for local domains? Our server host mail for domain.com; if i try to send a message from another computer to [EMAIL PROTECTED], using our server as smtp server, it does allow relay: there is a way to prevent this? Thanks

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

Peter Palmreuther wrote: > Hello Billy, > > On Saturday, July 2, 2005 at 6:32:47 PM Billy wrote: > > >>>N.B.: Number of authentication should not play a role in accessing >>>your cdb-file, if you're configured vpopmail to only use MySQL the cdb >>>will be as static as your kernel: unless *you* ch

[vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

Hello Billy, On Saturday, July 2, 2005 at 6:32:47 PM Billy wrote: >> N.B.: Number of authentication should not play a role in accessing >> your cdb-file, if you're configured vpopmail to only use MySQL the cdb >> will be as static as your kernel: unless *you* change it, it won't >> change. > (I'

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

At 10:59 AM 7/2/2005, you wrote: Well, I can't say I didn't do the the same thing until recently. I chose my own secret port number to bypass a port 25 block. Blocking port 25 is becoming a major reality now. I was merely saying that there is a standard way to allow things to happen. You w

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

r" as having an SMTP relay server at his site. That's just the way I read your original post. I was talking about the customer's system needing the firewall, not yours -- I see now you were talking about your own POP server, not theirs. note also that there is *no* reason for anyo

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

At 09:54 AM 7/2/2005, Tom Collins wrote: If I recall the thread though, the server in question is NOT set up for POP before SMTP. So, the cdb file is static and does not get updated. If it has 5 or so entries for the servers that will feed it, I would have to agree that a cdb lookup would to a

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

ternet. note also that there is *no* reason for anyone to use port 587. more below. As my other clue, your customer and others should get used to using port 587 as their SMTP relay port, rather than port 25. That way, some of your customer's users could be on the global Internet, and

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

On Jul 2, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Billy Newsom wrote: If you aren't familiar with the Matt Simerson mysql patch, it was born because there can be major lookup problems with the cdb file, especially using POP before SMTP. Imagine the POP server populating the text file (and re-compiling the CDB) 10 t

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

ther clue, your customer and others should get used to using port 587 as their SMTP relay port, rather than port 25. That way, some of your customer's users could be on the global Internet, and still send mail to their firewalled-port-25-is-illegal mail server all day on the submis

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

ld not play a role in accessing your cdb-file, if you're configured vpopmail to only use MySQL the cdb will be as static as your kernel: unless *you* change it, it won't change. Well, earlier this morning i 'turned off' my rcpthosts/morercpthosts files, leaving it to mysql

[vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

ccessed. >> >>vpopmail does not need to access these files. tcpserver needs to. Just >>add some static entries and tell tcpserver to use 'tcp.smtp.cdb' >>(which ever of the two you prefer) and let tcpserver *additionally* >>use MySQL database to look for dynamic rel

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

/u1/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb are > > > > being accessed. > > > >vpopmail does not need to access these files. tcpserver needs to. Just > >add some static entries and tell tcpserver to use 'tcp.smtp.cdb' > >(which ever of the two you prefer) and let tcpserver *additi

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

Just add some static entries and tell tcpserver to use 'tcp.smtp.cdb' (which ever of the two you prefer) and let tcpserver *additionally* use MySQL database to look for dynamic relay allowances. sure - i know i can do that. but with the rate of connections and authentications that take

[vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

Hello Paul, On Friday, July 1, 2005 at 1:05:50 AM Paul wrote: >> > okay, i presume then that there's a way to add permanent relay >> > entries into the mysql database. >> >>no need for this, just edit your tcp.smtp file and add a static entry. > i wish

Re: [vchkpw] block non-relay from remote to local?

At 04:01 PM 6/30/2005, you wrote: > okay, i presume then that there's a way to add permanent relay > entries into the mysql database. no need for this, just edit your tcp.smtp file and add a static entry. i wish - except for this config option when i built vpopmail: --disa

Re: [vchkpw] block non-relay from remote to local?

rcpthosts. > > > >you would just tell your POP server to allow relaying from the MX servers. > > okay, i presume then that there's a way to add permanent relay > entries into the mysql database. no need for this, just edit your tcp.smtp file and add a static entry. >

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

On Jun 30, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Henti Smith wrote: where is a decent howto these days http://shupp.org/toaster/ I use it every time I build a new hosting server (every 3 years or so). -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ Y

Re: [vchkpw] block non-relay from remote to local?

er. I'm not clear how the server would > accept new incoming mail for the domain from my own servers once the > MX does cut over here if there's no entry in rcpthosts. you would just tell your POP server to allow relaying from the MX servers. okay, i presume then that there's

Re: [vchkpw] block non-relay from remote to local?

On Thursday 30 June 2005 05:24 pm, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > >simply remove the domain from the rcpthosts file on the non-MX servers and > > no mail will be able to come in for that domain there. > > well, sure, i could do that, but then when they cut over here it'll > bollox everything up. the

Re: [vchkpw] block non-relay from remote to local?

At 02:26 PM 6/30/2005, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > the customer has *not* pointed the MX for their domain to us yet. > that will happen tonight. however, the customer has reported that > several of their accounts have received virus-laden email. it took a > while to figure it out - apparently the vir

Re: [vchkpw] block non-relay from remote to local?

h Matt Simerson's mysql patch so that the relay > queries don't hammer the tcp.smtp.cdb file. all works dandy. > > the customer has *not* pointed the MX for their domain to us yet. > that will happen tonight. however, the customer has reported that > several of their accou

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

On Thursday 30 June 2005 03:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't consider myself much of a code man or guru on mail servers but > when I choose qmail, I know I have to get my sleeves rolled up and get > stuck in.. > > Also when making your own mail server, shouldn't you have a little idea of >

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

ginal Message - From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:43 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ... > Chris Godwin wrote: > > >All I know is that I installed simscan and chose clamav as the viral > >scann

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

Chris Godwin wrote: All I know is that I installed simscan and chose clamav as the viral scanner. The error message that shows as follows: odin clamav # clamscan LibClamAV Warning: LibClamAV Warning: *** This version of the ClamAV engine

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

when using custom smtp rejection compiled in. Not answering your question as why these things happen. Just stating that they just happen. - Original Message - From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [v

[vchkpw] block non-relay from remote to local?

three incoming MX-only servers. one proxy server the MX servers forward on to to do spam/virus scanning, then pushed to the POP/IMAP/Webmail server where customers do their thang. tcpserver patched with Matt Simerson's mysql patch so that the relay queries don't hammer the tcp.smtp.cdb

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:49:26 -0500 "Chris Godwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the only way to avoid double bounces is chkuser patch. Postfix is find for a > few domains, less control imho. simscan has a spamassasin.pl patch that > enables peruser sa checking with vpopmail. I'll try chkuser and s

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

I don't consider myself much of a code man or guru on mail servers but when I choose qmail, I know I have to get my sleeves rolled up and get stuck in.. Also when making your own mail server, shouldn't you have a little idea of what you are getting into... Just my ten cents.. > On Thursday 30 J

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

Chris Godwin wrote: problems with qmailrocks-- vpopmail mail quota system is broken because of no maildir++ patch and few patches that enable chkuser and others, qmailscannerqueue is a freakin mem hog. Uses qscanqueue or simscan. If you use simscan, clamav's out of date warning will cause a hard

Re: [vchkpw] mail relay problems ...

On Thursday 30 June 2005 02:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The BEST howto: Was using this for ages before I made the crazy leap to > gentoo ebuild. May have to move back soon!! > > http://qmailrocks.org/ i disagree. It throws WAY too much stuff at the novice user. I can't tell you how many pe

  1   2   3   4   >