尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:59e8863641491084871729!
On 09/21/2015 03:02 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
security hole.
Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>> I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
>> security hole.
>> Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
>> checking (at all).
>>
>> Regards,
On 09/21/2015 02:26 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 0
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 1
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2015 09:30 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Applies perfectly! Thanks!
>>
>> On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, M
On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applies perfectly! Thanks!
On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applies perfectly! Thanks!
On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
succeed against the
5.5.0 trunk. Patches should be made against the most recent revision, which
can be checked out via
Subver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
succeed against the
5.5.0 trunk. Patches should be made against the most recent revision, which
can be checked out via
Subversion from Sourceforge.
On 09/18/2015 08:11 AM,
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
> When spamassassin is enabled but maildrop is not I see failed assertions in
> dovecots POP server[2], which are caused by vdelivermail using a wrong
> filename. The filename, more exactly the S= value is calculated
> _before_ the mail is piped into spamassassin, which adds two more header
> lines
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
>>> 5.5.0, some of it
>>> had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the snprintf
>>> tidy up's and the
>>> st
On 09/17/2015 04:04 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I have
On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I have created a patch for vpopmail-5.5.0 which incoporates all the changes
from 5.4.29 to
5.4.33, does anyone want this patch or has work in vpopmail-5.5.0 sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> I have created a patch for vpopmail-5.5.0 which incoporates all the changes
> from 5.4.29 to
> 5.4.33, does anyone want this patch or has work in vpopmail-5.5.0 stalled ?
Drew, I'd be happy to take a look a
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c wh
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is mo
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to a
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is mo
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Wh
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Whan I try to use 5.5.0 I found many
bug and
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
Yes, I know - that's I did some work on 5.5.0 and fixed the segmentation
fault to try and get it closer to stable.
On 09/15/2015 10:39 AM, Thibault Richard wrote:
This is probably why the 5.4.0 is still not considered as stable (the latest
stable version is still 5.4.33)
-Original Message
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Whan I try to use 5.5.0 I found many
bug and problems tha new features.
Why you need vpopm
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
I do not understand the problem.
Of course pa
This is probably why the 5.4.0 is still not considered as stable (the latest
stable version is still 5.4.33)
-Original Message-
From: Drew Wells [mailto:drew-vpopm...@elysium.ltd.uk]
Sent: Tuesday 15 September 2015 11:19
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Segmentation fault i
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e55641551049011877!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e35941551360728760!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e27941558004510909!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e1cc41551654711741!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e0eb41551555158803!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:5595fb4341556565779328!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/10/2014 10:36 AM, John Stile wrote:
> I have not seen any new additions to the mysql table vlog for a long time, so
> I am worried an
> update broke something.
>
> I am using vpopmail-5.4.33-r1, mysql-5.5.40, and netqmail-1.06-r2
>
> I tried t
Hello,
I tested the patch, but an error occurs for qmailadmin-1.2.16-0.el6.x86_64.
Could there be a new version of this patch.
Best regards,
Nikolay
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Tom Collins wrote:
> Sorry, forgot the link to the QmailAdmin patch:
> http://sourceforge.net/p/qmailadmin/patch
Sorry, forgot the link to the QmailAdmin patch:
http://sourceforge.net/p/qmailadmin/patches/28/
-Tom
On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
> I haven't checked the configuration in some time, so I don't know about
> minimum password requirements.
>
> I did recall this patch on Sourc
I haven't checked the configuration in some time, so I don't know about minimum
password requirements.
I did recall this patch on SourceForge to call out to cracklib and require a
strong password.
If you're comfortable with Javascript, you could modify the change password
screen to dynamically
Tom,
Thanks for the reply. Of course, sorry for the naïve query. Yes we use
qmailadmin to allow password changes by end users.
And we’ve just found a writeup here:
http://mugurel.sumanariu.ro/qmail/qmailadmin-check-if-password-is-strong-enough/
but it seems a little dodgy.
There isn’t by
Tom,
Thanks for the reply. Of course, sorry for the naïve query. Yes we use
qmailadmin to allow password changes by end users.
And we’ve just found a writeup here:
http://mugurel.sumanariu.ro/qmail/qmailadmin-check-if-password-is-strong-enough/
but it seems a little dodgy.
There isn’t by
The vchkpw program verifies the password. Are you wondering about the vpasswd
program for changing a password? That's an admin program, and wouldn't
typically enforce a password change policy.
How do your users currently change their passwords? QmailAdmin? Some other
program? You would hav
On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 09/01/2014 01:31 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
>> On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>> Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
>>> dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
>>> for im
On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
for imap and pop3 services. We're simply looking to take the next
logical step.
Not answering your question, but:
On 08/28/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks for this explanation Rick. Now knowing how this actually works, I
think I'll join you in being peeved about it. Not knowing any better, I
would have presumed that the user d-q files would have been processed
before the domain d-q files. Makes me
Rick,
At issue was that qmail only processes the ".qmail-alias" files in the domain
directory. It then hands off to vdelivermail via the .qmail-default file in
the domain directory.
The vdelivermail program is what parses the "user/.qmail" file for delivery
instructions. While that file foll
On 8/28/2014 7:26 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/27/2014 11:24 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tri
On 08/27/2014 11:24 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tries to deliver a message to the domain it
One thing to remember, and one of my pet peeves...
Out of all of the files in ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/ only one,
.qmail-default has anything to do with the vpopmail delivery process.
When qmail-local tries to deliver a message to the domain it looks at
all of the .qmail-* files in the d
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 08/25/2014 05:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>>> >I block the spam before it enters the system using simscan.
>> Thanks - not an option here since I need to allow users to opt in or out,
>> etc.
>
> The simcontrol file allows you to custo
On Aug 26, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-08-25 8:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
A quick question, curious about w
Hi,
On 2014-08-25 8:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
A quick question, curious about what others are doing…
We still use qmailadmin with our vpopmail setup, because it does ha
Charles,
It's been a long time since I've worked in that code, but here are some quick
thoughts:
1) There's already code reading the headers, searching for mail loops by
looking at the Delivered-To header. You could tap into that code.
2) You could look at simscan.c to see how they're interfa
On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> A quick question, curious about what others are doing…
>>
>> We still use qmailadmin with our vpopmail setup, because it does handle all
>> the basics pretty well.
Hi,
On 2014-08-25 2:55 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
A quick question, curious about what others are doing…
We still use qmailadmin with our vpopmail setup, because it does handle all the
basics pretty well. One weakness that’s giving us grief is forwarding. Since
qmailadmin has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks, Teodor! I'll take a look at this.
On 07/03/2014 10:36 AM, Teodor Milkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading to vpopmail 5.4.33 I started seeing much more IO requests. I
> see that in 5.4.32
> the following code was added to maildirquota.c:
>
ont.fr
>>
>>
>> Hope you understand me this time sorry :)
>>
>> Thank
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cordialement
>>
>> --
>> Stephane Salettes
>>
>
Stéphane,
try in this way:
* delete the forward ss...@piemont.fr
* create one normal account ss...@piemont.fr
* insert within this account a forward to spa...@piemont.fr
In this way it should work.
Tonino
Il 24/04/2014 19:45, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
That could very well be, Tom.
Stépha
Coupe
> 11100 Narbonne
>
> Tél: 33 (0)4 68 41 73 00
> FAX : 33 (0)4 6841 73 02
> GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
>
> http://www.abac-info.com
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
> Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
> À : vchkp
ine-
De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
>> 3) what you desire to happen
>> > When
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
>> 3) what you desire to happen
>> > When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the
>> > message go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to
>> > spa...@piemont.fr
>> >
>> > And when i send a massage to ss.
Il 17/04/2014 21:48, Remo Mattei ha scritto:
Hi Jeremy I tried your patch against 1.06 here is the output maybe you can help
out.
The Jeremy's patch should be apply starting from qmail-1.03. Please,
read "TO INSTALL" note.
Ciao
--
Alessio Cecchi is:
@ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/
Il 17/04/2014 20:39, Jeremy Kister ha scritto:
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06
so I plan to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I
want to add chkuser and tls but also few others like the c
Hi Jeremy I tried your patch against 1.06 here is the output maybe you can help
out.
Thanks
rw-r--r-- 1 root root 167 Apr 17 13:41 cdbmake_add.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 236 Apr 17 13:41 cdb_seek.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 459 Apr 17 13:42 dns.c.rej
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 312 Apr 17 1
On 4/17/2014 2:52 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Nice does it have tls?
no TLS; i use all SSL. o well. :)
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
!DSPAM:5350261b34264808310748!
Nice does it have tls?
Inviato da iPhone ()
> Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I
>> plan to recomp it and I have vpopmail w
Do u know what does this patch include will it work on netqmail 1.06?
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone ()
> Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmai
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been reall
On Apr 14, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 03:32 PM, Tom Ierna wrote:
>> In any case, I'm again looking into how to make a domain on one of my
>> vpopmail/qmail servers use
>> the "+" separator for subaddresses, rather than "-", and I'm coming up dry.
>> I realize that
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/14/2014 03:32 PM, Tom Ierna wrote:
> In any case, I'm again looking into how to make a domain on one of my
> vpopmail/qmail servers use
> the "+" separator for subaddresses, rather than "-", and I'm coming up dry. I
> realize that
> changing th
t? Or will their email
clients just automate the change?
*From:* "c...@milos.co.za"
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
*Subject:* [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPA
e the way they connect? Or will their email clients just
automate the change?
>
> From: "c...@milos.co.za"
>To: vchkpw@inter7.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
>Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM
ssful in the
> log) entries could be mail sent TO my server FROM another server on port 25.
> That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from
> overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly?
>
> -
> FROM: Tom Collins
> TO: vchkpw
on port 25.
> That tells me those are probably safe submissions - even if they are from
> overseas IPs. Am I thinking correctly?
>
>
>
>
> From: Tom Collins
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillo
Ps. Am I thinking correctly?
>
> From: Tom Collins
>To: vchkpw@inter7.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 12:02 AM
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
>
>
>
>vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai
, March 4, 2014 10:02:12 PM GMT-08:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail maillog vchkpw-submission vs vchkpw-smtp
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients
relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication.
vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for
vchkpw-submission is on port 587, and is typically used for emai clients
relaying mail. It's often set up to require authentication.
vchkpw-smtp is on port 25, and can be used for email clients to relay mail, or
by other servers delivering mail to your server.
-Tom
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:41 PM
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y
répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis SA
T :
00
Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: FBBE -- INTERNET
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 6:16:54 PM GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Bug in maildirquota.c
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
, January 31, 2014 11:14:37 AM GMT-06:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Bug in maildirquota.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/2014 05:34 AM, Simone Lazzaris wrote:
> The file descriptor number 5 of that process is pointing at the maildirsize
> file of the mailbox,
> and is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/31/2014 05:34 AM, Simone Lazzaris wrote:
> The file descriptor number 5 of that process is pointing at the maildirsize
> file of the mailbox,
> and is marked as "deleted" in /proc//fd
>
> We store the mail in a NetApp NFS share, without locking
Hi Eric,
i have it under:
libvpopmail_a-vpopmail.o:
U vauth_getpw
libvpopmail_a-vauth.o:
0caa T vauth_getpw
libvpopmail_a-vutil.o:
U vauth_getpw
So i think it is ok.
Thank you
Bye
Marcello
Il giorno 14/dic/2013, alle ore 03:01, Eric Shubert ha
scritto:
>
Nice I will chk
Inviato da iPhone ()
> Il giorno Dec 13, 2013, alle ore 14:47, Eric Shubert ha
> scritto:
>
>> On 12/13/2013 03:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>> Well, I think I know why my build fails, as I've patched vpopmail to
>> alter the location of the includes and lib directories.
>>
>>
Hi,
I have all correct I think.
/home/vpopmail/etc/lib_deps contains:
-L/home/vpopmail/lib -lvpopmail -Xlinker -R -Xlinker /usr/lib/mysql
-L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt
So it is correct.
If you see in my log:
checking for ev.h... yes
checking for ev_loop_new in -lev... yes
ch
I remember now. This file
./lib/libvpopmail.so was created with 5.5 but then vadmin was not working. So
I went back to 5.4.33. and I disabled the file and everything works fine but
this command vusaged
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 14:17:05, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net) wrot
One more thing, I am looking at my compile location and I do have it, I do get
a shared lib but I am not using it on my server.
Anyhow, I will check and let you know.
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 12:21:39, Marcello Lupo (ml...@itspecialist.it) wrote:
vusaged
!DSPAM:52ab6e0
Hi Marcello,
I am looking at my installation and I do not have vusaged are you sure you are
using 5.4.33?
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 12:21:39, Marcello Lupo (ml...@itspecialist.it) wrote:
vusaged
!DSPAM:52ab6d5c34264660412975!
Hi,
Thank you.
I tried in vpopmail-5.4.33 dir:
make distclean
autoreconf
automake
autoconf
./configure --enable-tcpserver-file=/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp \
--disable-roaming-users \
--enable-onchange-script \
--enable-auth-module=mysql \
--enable-logging=p \
--disable-mysql-limits \
--enable-v
Hi,
yes all is correct:
the only libvpopmail.a found are:
/usr/src/vpopmail-5.4.33/libvpopmail.a
/home/vpopmail/lib/libvpopmail.a
and are identical files.
I think the issue can reside in the way the configure script make the check of
vauth_getpw in the libvpopmail or depending on some configu
Hello,
Yes i have done it but it is not woking.
Anyway the make distclean is useless in the vusaged directory. It doesn’t
produce any effect since the Makefile have still to be created because
./configure is not working.
The libvpopmail.a is correctly found and loaded in the LDCONFIG.
Any hint?
T
Hello,
any news on this issue?
I have exactly this issue on ubuntu server 12.04 LTS x86_64 .
checking for vauth_getpw in -lvpopmail... no
checking for vauth_getall in -lvpopmail... no
checking for get_domain_entries in -lvpopmail... no
checking for client_query_quick in -lvpopmail... yes
configure
Replying to myself…
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.vpopmail/20650
Looks like I need 5.4.33. Built it with most of the strncpy and other nice
patches, compiled clean, and I'll do some testing tomorrow. If it holds up,
I'll submit my updated port to the FreeBSD folks and see if they'll ta
Anything further on this?
Hello Eric,
Since I didn't get any answer from vpopmail developers, I created my own
solution: a wrapper, vsanitize, which you use in command invocation in
.qmail file, i.e. instead of writing
| foobar args
you invoke
| vsanitize foobar args
and foobar will be called
that will work as well.
--
Remo Mattei
November 26, 2013 at 8:32:11, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net) ha scritto:
Hey Remo.
On 11/26/2013 08:58 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
> I just want to add a comment here. If you want to use it globally for
> the domain then I use the .qmail-default otherwi
Chère Madame,
Cher Monsieur,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront le plus rapidement possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Merci de ne pas y répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis SA
SA
T : +32(0)2 762 20 00
Montagne du Parc 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Bruxelles | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: Remo Mattei
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:58:19 AM GMT-08:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Troubleshooting vdelivermail
Hi everyone,
I just want to add a comment here
Hi everyone,
I just want to add a comment here. If you want to use it globally for the
domain then I use the .qmail-default otherwise single user is .qmail-username.
Just my 2 cents.
--
Remo Mattei
November 26, 2013 at 7:57:29, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net) ha scritto:
I'm curious to kno
1 - 100 of 13778 matches
Mail list logo
