Like I said ... with a filter (at the MTA level, system-wide) that adds
something like "x-spam:" to the headers, users could do the filtering in their
MUAs.
Robert J Adams wrote:
> Per user enable/disable would me much nicer than doing it "per host". Some
> people have a valid reason to not want
TECTED]>
To: "Robert J Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: RBL, ORBs etc filtering
> Why bother?
>
> cf. rblsmtpd for the entire host
>
> or cf. rblcheck for .procmailrc's ...
>
dul,relays,outputs.orbs.org,relays.orbs.org
-j
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Kolaci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian Clare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: RBL, ORBs etc filtering
&g
> > I use it -- I know how it works. However, I only block RBL hosts this
> > way -- I allow the other messages through because of poor listings on
> > the RSS, etc. and would appreciate a tool that just added such a mail
> > header as I suggested.
>
> I don't want to start one of t
Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:17:36PM -0500, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
>
> > I use it -- I know how it works. However, I only block RBL hosts this
> > way -- I allow the other messages through because of poor listings on
> > the RSS, etc. and would appreciate a tool that just
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:17:36PM -0500, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> I use it -- I know how it works. However, I only block RBL hosts this
> way -- I allow the other messages through because of poor listings on
> the RSS, etc. and would appreciate a tool that just added such a mail
> header as
> > It appears you assume that there is mail received
> > to attach headers to.
>
> There is mail, if you use rblcheck instead (which is what I suggested).
Ahh, but I would like to stop the spammers before they
even get the mail through and chew up resources (memory,
disk, etc.).
> >
Brian Kolaci wrote:
> It appears you assume that there is mail received
> to attach headers to.
There is mail, if you use rblcheck instead (which is what I suggested).
> rblsmtpd uses the lists which contain IP addresses
> of SMTP servers. It rejects them before *anything*
> happens. This is
It appears you assume that there is mail received
to attache headers to.
rblsmtpd uses the lists which contain IP addresses
of SMTP servers. It rejects them before *anything*
happens. This is the intended behaviour of most
of this spam prevention, to limit the amount of
resources used.
I was
Why not set a header value instead, like:
x-spamcheck: rbl,rss
... that the user can filter on ...
Brian Kolaci wrote:
> I've had the request to allow on a per-user, per-domain
> basis to either bounce or allow spam through. This may
> be an underlying request he had.
>
> I've started this, b
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:43:27AM -0500, Brian Kolaci wrote:
> My approach was to update rblsmtbd.c to instead of bounce
> the mail, set an environment variable. Then in qmail-smtpd,
> you can check the envelope and selectivly bounce it or not,
> depending on the contents in a new control file.
AIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: RBL, ORBs etc filtering
> That would be a great addition I guess, but once setup in qmail, isn't
> it working for all domains?
>
> Robert J Adams wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
&
> setting it up with/in qmail (tcpserver) should so do - imo
it does do quite well. using RBL/DUL/RSS on our servers.
Just follow setup in qmail documentation, no special vpopmail config
is required.
Chris Scheller
Network One Internet, inc.
http://www.networkone.net/
System/Network Administrati
Why bother?
cf. rblsmtpd for the entire host
or cf. rblcheck for .procmailrc's ...
Robert J Adams wrote:
> I was thinking about hacking in the ability to bounce spam based on RBL,
> ORBs etc into vpopmail.. Is anyone working on this? The idea is to have it
> user selectable.. anyone else inter
setting it up with/in qmail (tcpserver) should so do - imo
At 10:37 06.11.00 -0600, Brian Clare wrote:
>That would be a great addition I guess, but once setup in qmail, isn't
>it working for all domains?
>
>Robert J Adams wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I was thinking about hacking in the abili
That would be a great addition I guess, but once setup in qmail, isn't
it working for all domains?
Robert J Adams wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I was thinking about hacking in the ability to bounce spam based on RBL,
> ORBs etc into vpopmail.. Is anyone working on this? The idea is to have it
> us
16 matches
Mail list logo
