Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota

2008-02-08 Thread Steve Cole
D] Envoyé : jeudi 7 février 2008 10:41 À : vchkpw@inter7.com Objet : Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota Did you enable checking of quota in chkuser_settings.h, and recompile? Tonino Pierre GEOFFROY ha scritto: Thank you for your reply. Yes, vpopmail shows the correct

Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota

2008-02-08 Thread Rainer Duffner
Pierre GEOFFROY schrieb: > Thank you for your reply and help. > My understanding is that it is enabled (NOT commented): #define > CHKUSER_MBXQUOTA_VARIABLE "CHKUSER_MBXQUOTA" > and yes we recompiled > > PG Am I completely off-the-mark when I say that I thought that this is actually a variable th

RE: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota

2008-02-07 Thread Pierre GEOFFROY
2008 10:41 À : vchkpw@inter7.com Objet : Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota Did you enable checking of quota in chkuser_settings.h, and recompile? Tonino Pierre GEOFFROY ha scritto: Thank you for your reply. Yes, vpopmail shows the correct size and quota:

Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota

2008-02-07 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
d'origine- De : Shane Chrisp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 7 février 2008 00:42 À : vchkpw@inter7.com Objet : Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota What does vpopmail say about the mailbox? Is it showing the correct size and quota for the mailbox? On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 0

RE: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota

2008-02-07 Thread Pierre GEOFFROY
nter7.com Objet : Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota What does vpopmail say about the mailbox? Is it showing the correct size and quota for the mailbox? On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 00:20 +0100, Pierre GEOFFROY wrote: > Hello > > We are using checkuser 2.08 and it works fine, rejecting

Re: [vchkpw] checkuser + user's quota

2008-02-06 Thread Shane Chrisp
What does vpopmail say about the mailbox? Is it showing the correct size and quota for the mailbox? On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 00:20 +0100, Pierre GEOFFROY wrote: > Hello > > We are using checkuser 2.08 and it works fine, rejecting email for non-valid > recipients. > > We are encountering problem tr