On Tuesday, April 19 at 03:24 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen:
> On Tuesday 19 April 2005 03:04 pm, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 19 at 12:32 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen:
> > > On Monday 18 April 2005 10:48 pm, Rick van Vliet wrote:
> > > > You're right -- Thought I had that one. :\
> > > > But
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 03:04 pm, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 19 at 12:32 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen:
> > On Monday 18 April 2005 10:48 pm, Rick van Vliet wrote:
> > > You're right -- Thought I had that one. :\
> > > But if we can stretch this topic - why doesn't vpopmail 'pay attention
On Tuesday, April 19 at 12:32 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen:
> On Monday 18 April 2005 10:48 pm, Rick van Vliet wrote:
> > You're right -- Thought I had that one. :\
> > But if we can stretch this topic - why doesn't vpopmail 'pay attention
> > to locals or virtualdomains'? Is it just late and I'm spac
On Monday 18 April 2005 10:48 pm, Rick van Vliet wrote:
> You're right -- Thought I had that one. :\
> But if we can stretch this topic - why doesn't vpopmail 'pay attention
> to locals or virtualdomains'? Is it just late and I'm space-y?
It doesn't do it for any real reason, it just does it beca
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Saturday 16 April 2005 11:51 am, Rick van Vliet wrote:
I don't see any domain in both places.. however
rcpthosts:
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at
dbns.grasktruckgroup.com.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at dubuquepeterbilt.com.
SMTP clients ma
On Saturday 16 April 2005 11:51 am, Rick van Vliet wrote:
> Jeffrey A Schmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 23:07 -0500, Rick van Vliet wrote:
> >>Hi-
> >>Maybe I came in late on this thread, but have you posted the output of
> >>your /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl?
> >>Not sure that's goinng have
Jeffrey A Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 23:07 -0500, Rick van Vliet wrote:
Hi-
Maybe I came in late on this thread, but have you posted the output of
your /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl?
Not sure that's goinng have the whole answer, but there might be
something there that stands out.
rick
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 08:46 -0400, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> > I'm leaning toward a qmail issue vs. a vpopmail issue, but I admit I
> > don't know how much vpopmail is involved w/ the smtpd process.
> >
> > this is the relevant process running on the se
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 23:07 -0500, Rick van Vliet wrote:
> > # nc localhost 25
> > 220 mail.dubuquepeterbilt.com ESMTP
> > ehlo localhost
> > 250-mail.dubuquepeterbilt.com
> > 250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
> > 250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
> > 250-STARTTLS
> > 250-SIZE 8388608
> > 250-PIPELINING
>
On Apr 15, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
I'm leaning toward a qmail issue vs. a vpopmail issue, but I admit I
don't know how much vpopmail is involved w/ the smtpd process.
this is the relevant process running on the server:
/usr/bin/tcpserver -p -v -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 40 -u 201 -g 2
Jeffrey A Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 23:06 -0400, Tom Collins wrote:
On Apr 15, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
nope. same story:
# nc localhost 25
220 mail.dubuquepeterbilt.com ESMTP
ehlo localhost
250-mail.dubuquepeterbilt.com
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 23:06 -0400, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> > this is the relevant process running on the server:
> > /usr/bin/tcpserver -p -v -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 40 -u 201 -g 200
> > 0.0.0.0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> > mail.dubuquepeter
On Apr 15, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
this is the relevant process running on the server:
/usr/bin/tcpserver -p -v -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 40 -u 201 -g 200
0.0.0.0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
mail.dubuquepeterbilt.com /var/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true
If you're using one of the n
13 matches
Mail list logo
