Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:34 AM, Rick Widmer wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
> Now that .qmail files are fully supported in vpalias.c, we can
> update QmailAdmin to use the vpopmail API to work with the files,
> and it won't know anything about their contents.
I'm planning on it.
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:34 AM, Rick Widmer wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
> Now that .qmail files are fully supported in vpalias.c, we can
> update QmailAdmin to use the vpopmail API to work with the files,
> and it won't know anything about their contents.
I'm planning on it. I may even have it done
Tom Collins wrote:
Who the heck is Charles Cazabon and why should I care that he thinks
our files shouldn't be called .qmail?
Charles is probably the most knowledgeable person answering questions on
the qmail list. He can be a pain to work with sometimes, but if Charles
and DJB were arg
Tom Collins wrote:
(sorry for not including this in my last email)
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Rick Widmer wrote:
I still want to change files to .vpopmail, unless they go
out of their way to disable it. I think Charles Cazabon's objection
to .qmail files that are executed by vdelivermail is
(sorry for not including this in my last email)
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Rick Widmer wrote:
I still want to change files to .vpopmail, unless they go
out of their way to disable it. I think Charles Cazabon's
objection to .qmail files that are executed by vdelivermail is a
strong enough
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Rick Widmer wrote:
I did not see any objections on changing to .vpopmail* files in
user but
not domain directories. If anyone does object, now is the time.
Files
in ~vppopmail/domains/user_name/ are executed by vdelivermail and will
be renamed. Files in ~vpopma
