Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-19 Thread Dvorkin Dmitry
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: that's a great , but qmail is no more maintaned (no new features) no new features in qmail for 10 years... because it rocks! :) I'm sure, community will repack qmail soon to simplify things. !DSPAM:49c281b332685987920984! begin:vcard fn:Dmitry Dvorkin n:Dvorki

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Rick Macdougall
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: that's a great , but qmail is no more maintaned (no new features) will be a good ideia to make vpopmail more compatible with postfix and maybe others MTA's Qmail is now in the public domain. You are free to add any new features you want. Regards, Rick !DSPAM

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
> that's a great , but qmail is no more maintaned (no new features) > > will be a good ideia to make vpopmail more compatible with postfix and > maybe others MTA's > Ad that, my friend, is a horse of a totally different color. To the best of my knowledge there is no plan to make vpopmail work gen

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
that's a great , but qmail is no more maintaned (no new features) will be a good ideia to make vpopmail more compatible with postfix and maybe others MTA's >> > Well, that's a rather simplified statement.  After all, since vpopmail is > currently tied to qmail, you also have to get qmail into th

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Joshua Megerman wrote: >> The trick here is that by separating out the back-end authentication >> schemes into modules, you can provide a single source build for package >> maintainers, which will generate multiple component packages for the >>

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
> Josh > > thanks for explaining the things for me, my english is not good > You're welcome. > making vpopmail support loadable module support will bring vpopmail > into linux distros (fedora, opensuse, mandriva) and probably others > and make the vpopmail userbase grow. > Well, that's a rather s

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > Josh > > thanks for explaining the things for me, my english is not good > > making vpopmail support loadable module support will bring vpopmail > into linux distros (fedora, opensuse, mandriva) and probably others > and

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Megerman wrote: > The trick here is that by separating out the back-end authentication > schemes into modules, you can provide a single source build for package > maintainers, which will generate multiple component packages for the whole > setup

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
Josh thanks for explaining the things for me, my english is not good making vpopmail support loadable module support will bring vpopmail into linux distros (fedora, opensuse, mandriva) and probably others and make the vpopmail userbase grow. > Josh > > Joshua Megerman > SJGames MIB #5273 - OGR

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Joshua Megerman
>> proftpd-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) >> proftpd-ldap-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) >> proftpd-mysql-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) >> proftpd-postgresql-1.3.2-0.4.rc3.fc11.i586.rpm (info) (download) > > Again, I'm not sure how this makes it much e

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-18 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > to make it packagable like proftpd > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=91270 > > fedora compile proftpd only one time and the users have the choice of > ldap, mysql and pgsql database. > > if we nee

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-17 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
to make it packagable like proftpd http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=91270 fedora compile proftpd only one time and the users have the choice of ldap, mysql and pgsql database. if we need proftpd with mysql then I will install proftpd and proftpd-mysql packages and it will wo

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-17 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > at current state of vpopmail if we need vpopmail with mysql support, > then I need to compile vpopmail and link with mysql librarys > > if we need vpopmail with pgsql support then I need to recompile > everthing with pgsql

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-17 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
please look at fedora proftpd package http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=91270 he have some sub-packages, mysql, pgsql etc.. at current state of vpopmail if we need vpopmail with mysql support, then I need to compile vpopmail and link with mysql librarys if we need vpopmail w

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-17 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > Also will be a good idea to have loadable module support for databases > > mysql > sqlite > pgsql > cdb > > etc... I'm not sure loadable module support is really all that useful. > this will make packaging easy Please

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-17 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
Also will be a good idea to have loadable module support for databases mysql sqlite pgsql cdb etc... this will make packaging easy > I'm currently working on adding FHS compliance to the 5.5 branch.  5.4 is > frozen > to everything except bugfixes. Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-17 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Japheth Cleaver wrote: > On Sat, March 14, 2009 10:30 am, aledr wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > > *snip* > > We've had the same sort of concerns regarding FHS compliance (and > eas-of-package-building) for some tim

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail FHS compliance

2009-03-17 Thread Japheth Cleaver
On Sat, March 14, 2009 10:30 am, aledr wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: *snip* We've had the same sort of concerns regarding FHS compliance (and eas-of-package-building) for some time, and have had a set of patches within our RPM that have proved effective for us.