I've never had any issues with them personally (aside from not liking the
concept) but as far as I know neither vpopmail nor qmail have anything to do
with delivery confirmation. It's a MUA to MUA thing and the recipient can
decide if he wants to confirm he read the message. Your client just nee
I found the patch. Qreceipt is the key.
Bye
Remo
On 7/2/09 10:09 PM, "Remo Mattei" wrote:
> Hello I wonder if anyone has done qmail vpopmail and delivery confirmation
> since I have a client that asked me about to get notified when sending an
> email out with outlook.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
Michele are you italian? If you want contact me
offline.
Ciao,
Remo
Michele Virgilio wrote:
I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on a
new CentOs machine.
It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How can I
do?
Thanks.
Mik
!DSP
You also need to backup mysql if you use it :) and
the assgin and virtual host in qmail otherwise you have to install all
the domains with the same username and passwd and then copy over the
users' info
Ciao,
Remo
Ron Miller wrote:
Mik,
You want to install vpopmail as usual on th
Sorry, hit wrong button...
No for the software side, depending on how you have your mail setup, courier
or pop3 depends on the mail itself. If it's pop3 you can move it just fine,
as long as you setup vpopmail the same as before. If your using courier,
you can use a program like imapsync (source
Short answer, NO, libs are different...
Joe
Michele Virgilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 machine on
>a
>new CentOs machine.
>It is possible to copy all data without reinstall (and configure)? How can
>I
>do?
>Thanks.
>Mik
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michele Virgilio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 6:04 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: [vchkpw] Qmail, vpopmail etc. migration: from Fedora Core 1 to
> CentOs
>
> I need to migrate my old qmail installation on a Fedora Core 1 mac
Hi All,
Much thanks for all the helpful replies.
I have reverted back to courier-imap v3.0.8, and all is now working as
expected - open-smtp is being updated properly by both imap and pop3.
Again thanks for quick replies and for pointing me in the right
direction to resolve this!!
Best reg
Hi Joshua,
Thanks for the reply.
The majority of my users are using pop3 - however I have a handful of
senior execs that need/want to use imap (this is tied to our webmail &
wapmail interfaces). This cutomer was an existing user of
qmail/vpopmail/courier (installed in 2003) however we just r
Rick Widmer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 07:49:31AM -0700:
>
>
> Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote:
> >Hi Micheal,
> >
> >Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw
> >--without-authdaemon" but it made no difference.
> >
> >If I understand your email correctly, since I'm
Otto Rodusek (AP-SGP) wrote:
Hi Micheal,
Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw
--without-authdaemon" but it made no difference.
If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2
it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp
> Hi Micheal,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw
> --without-authdaemon" but it made no difference.
>
> If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2
> it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file??
> Hence it is I
Hi Micheal,
Thanks for the reply. Indeed, I did use the "--with-authvchkpw
--without-authdaemon" but it made no difference.
If I understand your email correctly, since I'm using courier-imap 4.1.2
it is impossible for imap authentication to update the open-smtp file??
Hence it is IMPOSSIBLE
IMAP-before-SMTP is possible when using Courier-IMAP v3.x. However it only
works when configured "--with-authvchkpw --without-authdaemon". When
running --without-authdaemon, Courier-IMAP's authvchkpw code is able to make
use of vpopmail's roaming user functions to allow IMAP-before-SMTP
functio
Your /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file looks fine.
Add the following line in your /etc/tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
and run qmailctl cdb
then try...
Regards,
Manish Jain
(Sr. Engineer - IDC)
Hughes Communications India Ltd.
Plot-1, Sector-18,
Electronic City, Gurgaon.
Email: [E
did u apply the patch to qmail?
check shupp.org
Remo
Winanjaya - CBN wrote:
> Dear Expert,
>
> I need help for setting up qmail+vpopmail smtp-auth with roaming-users
>
> I had configured vpopmail with --enable-roaming-users= y option
> my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run as follow:
>
> #!/
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Are you logging in with [EMAIL PROTECTED] or just postmaster ?
Just postmaster.
I just tried with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it works!!!
Thank you!!!
--
BR!
Chris
Krzysiek Włodarczak wrote:
Hi!
I am sorry for another one post but it can be important:
E-mail sent form other domain reached the account on my server properly.
Hi,
Are you logging in with [EMAIL PROTECTED] or just postmaster ?
Regards,
Rick
Hi!
I am sorry for another one post but it can be important:
E-mail sent form other domain reached the account on my server properly.
--
Best regards!
Chris
Krzysiek Włodarczak wrote:
The funny thing is I also can not log to the postmaster panel in
Qmailadmin.
OK, now it's working - bad rights to the domains folder, fixed.
Unfortunately authentication via SMTP & POP3 sill doesn't work.
--
Best regards!
Chris
now.
Thank you All.
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Hi,
Run the commands:
#Echo doublebounce >/var/qmail/c
On Thursday 03 November 2005 07:38 pm, Sam wrote:
> >> I noticed that one local user which I created when I installed qmail and
> >> before installing vpopmail, was getting lots of messages from qmail
> >> under /home/user/Maildir.
> >
> >what do your logs say about this? (Hint: if you had some of
what Tom is getting at.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2005 14:50
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
Tom you hit it right.
My problem is tones of doublebounces of spam from forged
to postmaster?
I will create .qmail-doublebounce and put "#" in
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce
to delete all doublebounces
Thanks,
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 AM
Subject: Re:
On Nov 3, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Sam wrote:
@4000436ab0a417e5a724 info msg 116176: bytes 2174 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp
20947 uid 501
Looks like doublebounce messages. What do you have in
/var/qmail/control/doublebounceto?
I've set my server to have "doublebounce" in that file, and then pu
uot; and
"tmp" directories again.
it's not supposed to.
-Jeremy
Ok, but why qmail was writing to that directory?
Thank you All for your help.
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Kitchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:31 PM
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 06:37 pm, Sam wrote:
> Remo,
>
> I noticed that one local user which I created when I installed qmail and
> before installing vpopmail, was getting lots of messages from qmail under
> /home/user/Maildir.
what do your logs say about this? (Hint: if you had some of thos
Message -
From: "Remo Mattei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy
did u check your kernel? there are some hackers that may exploit your
server check your /tmp directory if yo
did u check your kernel? there are some
hackers that may exploit your server check your /tmp directory if you are also
running apache and see if you see some hidden directories, etc..
just my 2 cents.
Remo
- Original Message -
From:
Sam
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent:
I did that, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and thats the error I get, I'm missing
something cuz even removing the patch its not storing email somehow. Even
tho the mx isn't setup, I do it locally, telnet localhost 25 (which has to
my knowledge everything I need to do email) it accepts it, but I dont show
it co
At 06.08 11/09/2005, you wrote:
Ok I did run the test like you said, I loged in as root stoped qmail and
ran /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd manually
and I still get the error
511 sorry, you must specify a domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser).
Well, it means you are using a recipients without specifying a do
Ok I did run the test like you said, I loged in as root stoped qmail and
ran /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd manually
and I still get the error
511 sorry, you must specify a domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser).
Per my previous conversation I did compile UID and GID switching, an below
you can see I changed the
At 23.45 09/09/2005, you wrote:
Greetings,
I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have
copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the
new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving any
errors adding domains, adding users,
I did that as well.
> On Sep 9, 2005, at 3:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have
>> copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the
>> new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving
>
On Sep 9, 2005, at 3:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently working on moving my mail server to another box. I have
copied the database, rcpt files, /home/vpopmail/domains over. with the
new qmail setup I have decided to use chkuser 2.0. I'm not recieving
any
errors adding domains, ad
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
isn't
exporting to say.. a CSV file even easier? I would think so :)
Yes it probably would be. But the only way I can see to get emerald to
export user info is to use their ldap sync server. That or I would
just have to access the database emerald stores info in. The r
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 02:48 pm, Joshua Coucke wrote:
> >you could also just export their information to say.. a flat file.. and
> > then import that into whatever backend you want.
> Yes, I could. I just picked LDAP because it was the easiest thing to
> get our client software (Emerald) to ex
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:04 pm, Joshua Coucke wrote:
Hey, I am trying to get a new email server working using
qmail+vpopmail+ldap. The user software we have will export users to the
qmail-ldap schema. The problem is that it looks like the vpopmail ldap
s
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:04 pm, Joshua Coucke wrote:
> Hey, I am trying to get a new email server working using
> qmail+vpopmail+ldap. The user software we have will export users to the
> qmail-ldap schema. The problem is that it looks like the vpopmail ldap
> schema is not the same as the qm
On Friday 26 November 2004 02:23 am, Mariusz Czarnecki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using set of software as in topic.
> I've got line my.domain:my.domain line in virtualdomains file in qmail
> control dir.
> My virual domain is also default domain.
> Reply message going from autorespond has sender add
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] QMail + Vpopmail vs. Postfix + Cyrus IMAP
>
>
> Am Mi, den 08.09.2004 schrieb Michael Bowe um 23:20
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Ess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ooh... While we're at it, we could add vpopmail support for sendmail...
Once vpopmail is abstracted from qmail that would be easy. :)
I fully realize that everyone who uses vpopmail also uses qmail. Me too. A
lot of people lik
At 08:41 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Are you being sarcastic?
no.
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://www.smileglobal.com
At 08:39 AM 9/9/2004, you wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need
to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :)
well, qmail isn't
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
>
> Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need
> to patch Postfix. Patches suck.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Are you being sarcastic?
-Steve
> At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need
to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :)
> At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
> >- Orig
What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with
> postfix MTA :-)
Yes! I keep saying that. I ha
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with
> postfix MTA :-)
Yes! I keep saying that. I had heard that there is work going on to create
an abstraction layer between vpopmail and qmail (i.e. vpop
Am Mi, den 08.09.2004 schrieb Michael Bowe um 23:20:
> But! whenever I demonstrate the vpopmail software to any of the guys at my
> new place of employment, they are the ones who are marvelling at the ease of
> use and features of vpopmail.
Indeed.
Postfix _is_ nice (cyrus is debatable, IMO), but
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Giunchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Il mer, 2004-09-08 alle 19:55, Jesse Guardiani ha scritto:
> > Howdy folks,
> >
> > Sorry for the flame bait, but I'm just curious what all you
> > seasoned vpopmail veterans have to say about Postfix + Cyrus.
> >
> > Back
Il mer, 2004-09-08 alle 19:55, Jesse Guardiani ha scritto:
> Howdy folks,
>
> Sorry for the flame bait, but I'm just curious what all you
> seasoned vpopmail veterans have to say about Postfix + Cyrus.
>
> Back in 2002 when my company chose to go with QMail + Vpopmail
> I thought it was the Right
Ken Jones wrote:
On Thursday 08 July 2004 11:12 am, Edilmar wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote:
Hi,
I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 +
qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner.
Now, I'd like to do some ki
On Thursday 08 July 2004 11:12 am, Edilmar wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
> >On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 +
> >>qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner.
> >>
> >>Now, I'd like to do some kin
Ken Jones wrote:
On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote:
Hi,
I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 +
qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner.
Now, I'd like to do some kind of SMTP authetication using the idea of
SMTPafterPOP, to use the vpopmail us
On Thursday 08 July 2004 08:47 am, Edilmar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system with netqmail 1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.0 + sqwebmail 4.0.5 +
> qmailadmin 1.2.0 + clamav 0.73 + qmailscanner.
>
> Now, I'd like to do some kind of SMTP authetication using the idea of
> SMTPafterPOP, to use the vpopmail users (i
or use uebimiau
http://www.uebimiau.org
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Kitchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, Vpopmail, Sqwebmail, Courier-IMAP and Gentoo
On Wednesday 30 Ju
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 09:48 am, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to setup an email system and use Sqwebmail as a web-based
> frontend. I am doing this on a Gentoo box. I have installed Qmail,
> Vpopmail and Courier-IMAP via gentoo's portage system. I have it all
> configured and se
> delivery 25: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
Even i keep getting this and till now, if i grep on my /var/log/qmail dir.,
i get...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail]# grep "Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir" * -c
@400040a78dbc24c33f4c.s:253
@400040a8751f27f2c8a4.s:161
@400040a9ad961
On Friday, November 28, 2003, at 01:00 PM, Alastair Battrick wrote:
I'm having problems getting vpopmail 5.3.29, qmail 1.03 and
qmail-scanner
1.20rc3 working together on a RH9 box. QMAILQUEUE patch is installed.
Qmail
& vpopmail work fine without this line in
/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp
:allow,
Did you increase the memory that the smtp service can use?
Look at your smtp/run file
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 1380 \
-Original Message-
From: Alastair Battrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] qmail, vpop
W.D. McKinney wrote:
>edit /etc/tcp.smtp and add 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>then issue 'qmailctl cdb'
>Then issue 'qmailctl stop'
>then '/home/vpopmail/bin/clearopensmtp'
>now issue 'qmailctl start'
>
That got rid of the error message, but outgoing messages were still stuck in
the qmail queue
did you run tcprules??
- Original Message -
From: "Sigmund Gudvangen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:41 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of
allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1.)
> Hi,
>
> I have just done a fre
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 14:41, Sigmund Gudvangen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just done a fresh install of qmail and vpopmail, on Mandrake 9.1,
> following Dave Sill, http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html for the qmail
> installation. qmail is running fine; i.e. all four daemons are running and
> ins
nt: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:43 PM
To: Neo Wee Teck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin
Your solution will never work.
I recommend you to install procmail and do something like this:
.qmail-default:
|preline procmail -p -m /etc/procmailrules
/etc/procmail
: Neo Wee Teck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + vpopmail + Spamassassin
Your solution will never work.
I recommend you to install procmail and do something like this:
.qmail-default:
|preline procmail -p -m /etc/procmailrules
/etc/procmailrules:
0fw
* < 25
| spamc
:0:
Your solution will never work.
I recommend you to install procmail and do something like this:
.qmail-default:
|preline procmail -p -m /etc/procmailrules
/etc/procmailrules:
0fw
* < 25
| spamc
:0:
*^X-Spam-Flag: YES
/home/spam
:0w
|/home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
Th
Hi,
Clinton James wrote:
I'm working in gentoo with qmail 1.03 and vpopmail 5.2.1.
POP works just fine but authenticated STMP is a bust. Using some of the
information I have found here and other places I used strace to try and find
out what the problem is. As best as I can tell I am getting a b
Not quite sure how your setup is.. but I finally got maildrop/vpopmail
working for me by using a version of vpopmail that has the seekable patch
and putting a .qmail file inside each user's directory who wants a spam
filter.
It has worked out beneficially for me because the spam filter can now be
lixiang,
I'd encountered exactly the same problem(-ERR aack, child crashed) with
vchkpw using LDAP as backend. I'd tried many different configurations and
finally it seem like I can get around this problem.
The solution is configure vpopmail with --enable-clear-passwd=n parameter.
My configu
Hi, Jens:
actually, my rootdn was " cn=root,dc=koal,dc=com" in both my vldap.h and slapd.conf
in the before, and i ensured that the basedn in vldap.h was
"ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" . i tested what you mentioned just now, this cann't help
me .
the "err acck ,child crashed " error
Zitat von lixiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi lixiang,
OK, now I see your Prob !!
It is somekind of loop that you configured:
See here:
slapd.conf:
--- snip
> suffix "dc=koal,dc=com"
> rootdn "cn=root,ou=people,dc=koal,dc=com" <--- WRONG !!
--- snap
vldap.h
--- snip
> #define
hi,Jens:
I did guess that you should be off for your business trip or holidays , :-)
I think basedn and binddn is the same in my vldap.h and slapd.conf, and if i have
the below entry tree in my openldap through ldapbrowser:
dc=koal,dc=com
|
->ou=people
|
Zitat von lixiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi lixiang,
sorry for my late responds, I have been off for holiday ;-))
So if you verified your LDAP-Entries that they look like below ( e.g. with gq )
your are fine.
> dc=koal,dc=com
> |
> ->ou=people
>|
> -> ou
> rav antivirus installs fine, but did you remember to stop qmail before
running
> the rav installer?
> also.. rav replaces qmail-queue not qmail-local
> also .. don't anonymize your logs, you're hiding information that might
lead
> us how to fix your problem:)
Thanks for help! Ofciurae i stopper
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:11:29PM +0200, Maciej Nadolski wrote:
> Hi!
> I can`t find help! Mayby you will know the answer. I`m runing qmail with
> vpopmail. I wanted to install rav antivirus and then s*** happed. Qmail
> stoped to deliver messages, sp I repleaced qmail-local with vpoplocal or
> st
Message -
From: "dWi sAsonO b" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eugene Chua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail woes
> try getting email manual throught pop3 port
> yo
try getting email manual throught pop3 port
you can get your answer there
i suppose it because softlimit program
On Wed, 28 May 2003 09:03:44 +0800
Eugene Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> qmail + vpopmail woes
> Hi!
>
> I've got qmail installed and working great!
> qsend, qsmtp and qpop3d is
ure of my build
tree.
Thanks,
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 4:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail+vpopmail+PostgreSQL
> I've read some previous messages in the archive, regarding
The main problem was gentoo does not install authvchpw in
/usr/lib/courier-imap/authlib/ Once you manually install that file.
Hacking up the init and conf scripts is a breeze.
bob
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 09:57, bob ketterhagen wrote:
> After totally removing it and starting from scratch I was able
After totally removing it and starting from scratch I was able to hack
the init/conf scripts to work correctly.
Thanks again,
bob
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 05:41, Justin Heesemann wrote:
> On Thursday 27 February 2003 02:12, bob ketterhagen wrote:
> > This vpopmail-5.2.1-r4.ebuild everything is defa
On Thursday 27 February 2003 02:12, bob ketterhagen wrote:
> This vpopmail-5.2.1-r4.ebuild everything is default nothing special, I
> have it working on numerous other servers with not a single problem. It'
> s just the newest mailserver I have built that I am having this problem
> on. I can send m
This vpopmail-5.2.1-r4.ebuild everything is default nothing special, I
have it working on numerous other servers with not a single problem. It'
s just the newest mailserver I have built that I am having this problem
on. I can send myself email and recieve it. I can remove the relay
table, check my
On Thursday 27 February 2003 01:26, bob ketterhagen wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have spent all day trying to figure out why my relay table in the
> vpopmail database is empty. I have previously had this same setup in
> gentoo a few months ago and never had a single problem. Currently I have
> rebuilt che
> I've read some previous messages in the archive, regarding the possibility
> of using PostgreSQL as a vpopmail backend. I hate to admit it, I haven't
> understood a thing. Is the vpgsql module active by default ? There's no
> ./configure argument for that, as in MySQL's case. I really can't find
Hi Anonymous,
please use a real name when posting. Thanks.
> Is there a way to use a filter on every user in a vpopmail-domain directory
> without putting the filter in every .qmail-user file ?
Not on a per-domain basis. You can use server-wide scanners like
qmail-scanner (http://qmail-scanner.s
Hello Clayton,
aha, now I got it.
you controlled it over tcpserver command. Oh my
god.
tcpserver opts host port
prog
Here's mine. Also, PLEASE READ life with qmail. It has this
very samething in there and it explains all the components of
it.env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/us
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 &
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail vpopmail - more than one IP to listen to
Hi Clayton,
where t
#x27;s bound to the
box.
-Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Ajai Khattri
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail vpopmail - more than one IP to listen
to
Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) wrote:
> I want qmail to li
Khattri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:20
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: [vchkpw] qmail vpopmail - more than one IP to listen toOliver
Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) wrote:> I want qmail to listen to more than
one IP. Hpw can I do that?Qmail listens
Clayton Weise wrote:
Qmail doesn't listen on any ports. tcpserver listens on whatever ip's you
tell it to.. by default, people put "0" which means all ip's bound to the
box.
I meant tcpserver of course!
Pedant! ;-)
--
Aj.
Systems Administrator / Developer
, 2003 9:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail vpopmail - more than one IP to listen to
Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) wrote:
> I want qmail to listen to more than one IP. Hpw can I do that?
Qmail listens on all IPs by default.
--
Aj.
Systems Administrator / Developer
Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) wrote:
I want qmail to listen to more than one IP. Hpw can I do that?
Qmail listens on all IPs by default.
--
Aj.
Systems Administrator / Developer
google for an answer first. then check the qmail mailing list archives
(where? google for an answer to that). then if you can't find an answer
(it's been answered many times before), try asking on the qmail mailing
list. this is the vpopmail mailing list. wrong place to ask.
At 11:01 AM 02-09-20
: Monday, December 30, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Lapidus, Keith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail + mysql + Redhat 8
Keith,
In an effort to troubleshoot this particular problem... Would it be
possible for you to alter the assign file to also include an entry for
kelnet.net_ but
Cory Wright; vpopmail usergroup
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail/vpopmail cannot auth pop3 clients. No
> logging.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cory Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 December 2002 05:42
> To: vpopmail usergroup
> Subject: Re
Keith?
Please switch off your Return-Receipt - it is most annoying.
--
Aj.
Systems Administrator / Developer
PROTECTED]]
::Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:21 PM
::To: Tom Walsh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail + mysql + Redhat 8
::
::
::Tom,
::
::Thanks for the info although I believe that everything is configured
::correctly. I did notice something interesting though. When I
ge-
From: Tom Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Lapidus, Keith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail + mysql + Redhat 8
Keith,
I have seen this problem one time in the past when I was setting up a
Free BSD machine.
I don't re
ginal Message-
::From: Lapidus, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
::Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 10:22 AM
::To: Tom Walsh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail + vpopmail + mysql + Redhat 8
::
::
::I understand where you are coming from, and I have installed and
::reinstalled vpopmail
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
