Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rick Widmer wrote: >> On some supremely busy systems, couldn't this potentially add to existing >> disk bound I/O wait? > > Yes, but long ago it was decided that having the database info in a file > was needed. I figure that since we are already open

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rick Widmer wrote: o Eliminate as many ifdefs as possible. [2] -- No ifdefs in the libvpopmail function headings. > > I'm not sure what you're referring to here. > Sorry, it has been a long time since I've looked at the

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rick Widmer wrote: > I agree moving to Subversion is a good idea. I was planning on only > doing bug fixes on version 5 and leaving it in cvs then starting version > 6 in Subversion. The major change from 5 to 6 would be organizing the > existing cod

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

One more thing, all the code that manages files in /var/qmail should be moved to a separate directory, and called so that people who want to use vpopmail with other email servers can write replacement code and select it with a symlink like the authentication back ends are selected... Rick

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

Thanks for finding time to work on vpopmail! I wish I had more of it... Matt Brookings wrote: I'd be very interested in seeing the project moved over to Subversion. Does anyone have any input on this? I agree moving to Subversion is a good idea. I was planning on only doing bug fixes o

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 14, 2009, at 7:55 AM, Matt Brookings wrote: I was wondering if anyone had any input on moving vpopmail to Subversion. After working with CVS for years, and then moving most of my development trees to Subversion, I've found it to be much e

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dave Weiner wrote: >> Have you looked at/considered Git? I've just started using it, and I'm >> finding that I like it's approach much better than CVS or Subversion. >> It's website is at

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 DAve wrote: > I've not used version control since prior to subversion, but I can say I > have not met any subversion users who would switch back to CVS. Subversion is definitely better, but I know we have a lot of people who at the very least lurk on

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Weiner wrote: > Have you looked at/considered Git? I've just started using it, and I'm > finding that I like it's approach much better than CVS or Subversion. > It's website is at http://git-scm.com/ I'd like to keep vpopmail on Sourceforge. I

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was wondering if anyone had any input on moving vpopmail to Subversion. After working with CVS for years, and then moving most of my development trees to Subversion, I've found it to be much easier to work with. I'd be ver

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was wondering if anyone had any input on moving vpopmail to Subversion. After working with CVS for years, and then moving most of my development trees to Subversion, I've found it to be much easier to work with. I'd be ver