Tonix (Antonio Nati) skriver:
chkuser does not check for local users when domain is defined into locals.
In such a case it simply accept any recipient for local domains. Reason is
simple. For checking local domains users it should have root privileges,
which is not wanted for a lot of reasons.
John M. Simpson skriver:
On 2012-08-17, at 13:33, Allan Dukat wrote:
>
> On my current server I am using the netqmail-1.05-validrcptto.cdb.patch
> but I have decided to switch to chkuser.patch, so chkuser is new to me.
Is it okay for me (the author of the validrcptto.cdb code) to ask why you
chkuser does not check for local users when domain is defined into locals.
In such a case it simply accept any recipient for local domains. Reason
is simple. For checking local domains users it should have root
privileges, which is not wanted for a lot of reasons.
I suggest to abandon any loca
On 2012-08-17, at 13:33, Allan Dukat wrote:
>
> On my current server I am using the netqmail-1.05-validrcptto.cdb.patch
> but I have decided to switch to chkuser.patch, so chkuser is new to me.
Is it okay for me (the author of the validrcptto.cdb code) to ask why you
decided to switch?
Am 04.11.2007 um 22:51 schrieb Quey:
If you are going to use that as a stand point, maybe you need to
use bloated winblows :)
No thanks.
Or for that matter in Linux I think Ubuntu, or OpenSolaris as they
all apparently have trillions of packages ...
It's not the packages - it's
I fail to see what this has to do with vpopmail.
Please take it off the list.
Rick
Michael Johnson wrote:
Quey wrote:
Michael Johnson wrote:
It is nice to use Slackware because it doesn't do funky stuff with
software. qmail installs fairly easily and fits in decently well. Oh, it
also works
Michael Johnson wrote:
I follow the rule that one should never log in directly as root. In this
case, you need at least one mortal local account as an initial login.
- Michael
It should not matter about a local root login, after all you do protect
your servers at the core routers dont you.
Quey wrote:
> Michael Johnson wrote:
>> It is nice to use Slackware because it doesn't do funky stuff with
>> software. qmail installs fairly easily and fits in decently well. Oh, it
>> also works great on slower hardware because you can strip services to
>> the bare essentials easily and thus leav
Michael Johnson wrote:
It is nice to use Slackware because it doesn't do funky stuff with
software. qmail installs fairly easily and fits in decently well. Oh, it
also works great on slower hardware because you can strip services to
the bare essentials easily and thus leave more resources for the
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Quey schrieb:
Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello I have a few questions since I am building a new server. Now the
box is running centos 4.5 with qmail and fuzzyocr, spamassassin,dspam
and tmda with simscan the load during the day is hi since it's an
old P3
1.2mgz and 1.5g of mem. t
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Quey schrieb:
>> Remo Mattei wrote:
>>> Hello I have a few questions since I am building a new server. Now the
>>> box is running centos 4.5 with qmail and fuzzyocr, spamassassin,dspam
>>> and tmda with simscan the load during the day is hi since it's an old P3
>>> 1.2mgz an
Quey schrieb:
Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello I have a few questions since I am building a new server. Now the
box is running centos 4.5 with qmail and fuzzyocr, spamassassin,dspam
and tmda with simscan the load during the day is hi since it's an old P3
1.2mgz and 1.5g of mem. this box is running mysql
Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello I have a few questions since I am building a new server. Now the
box is running centos 4.5 with qmail and fuzzyocr, spamassassin,dspam
and tmda with simscan the load during the day is hi since it's an old P3
1.2mgz and 1.5g of mem. this box is running mysql 4.1.x, vpopmai
Rick Macdougall said:
> Hi,
>
> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
>
> What is this qscan you mention? Google doesn't show anything. I know
> qscanq, but it doesn't (to me) support SA within it.
My apologies as I was mistaken.. It was qscanq ... And I believe
qmail-spamc is the program that sup
Rick Macdougall said:
> Hi,
>
> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
>
> What is this qscan you mention? Google doesn't show anything. I know
> qscanq, but it doesn't (to me) support SA within it.
My apologies as I was mistaken.. It was qscanq ... And I believe
qmail-spamc is the program that sup
Hi,
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
Yeah, I don't remember patching anything here for that... Bill's toaster
has just about everything... He's planning on posting a new version
sometime soon (possibly next week) with a few new features, including
qscan instead of qmail-scanner...
What is this q
Roger Lipscombe said:
> I'm using qmail+vpopmail+BincIMAP+SquirrelMail+ClamAV+qmailAdmin. See
> http://www.differentpla.net/node/view/165 for how I did it. I'm not using
> SpamAssassin (it's on the list, though), and I don't need quota support.
> It's all working together extremely well.
Using B
I have pretty much the same setup, except I use vpopmail in the mix, and
squirrelmail for the webmail side of things. I have no experience
with SqWebmail, so I can't really compare them. One bonus for
squirrelmail is that if you configure spamassasin with mysql support,
you can put a highly
Kit Halsted wrote:
> Howdy Folks:
>
> I've just been asked to either set up a new server or add some
> services to an existing server.
[snip]
> I'd love to hear from anybody who's using these together, & I think I
> also need to patch qmail for Maildir++ (?) support? Does the patch
> for that in
19 matches
Mail list logo
